Skip to main content
Log in

Screening for severe mental disorder in jails

The development of the referral decision scale

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Despite the demonstrated prevalence of severe mental disorder among jail detainees and the legal mandate to provide mental health services, most jails do not have the resources to incorporate traditional, time-consuming psychological assessment techniques into their routine intake process. As a result, a number of mentally ill jail detainees remain undetected and untreated. This study outlines the development of the “Referral Decision Scale” (RDS), which detects persons who have a high probability of having a severe mental disorder so that they can be given a complete diagnostic evaluation. The 14-item RDS was statistically derived using discriminant analysis from data collected via the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule on 728 randomly selected male jail detainees and then validated on 1,149 prison inmates. The final validated version of the RDS had an overall sensitivity of 0.791, specificity of 0.987, and positive and negative predictive value of 0.791 and 0.013, respectively. Since these statistics far exceed current detection rates, the RDS is likely to facilitate the diversion of mentally ill detainees in situations where it is impractical to administer psychological examinations to all incoming inmates. Training requirements for the RDS and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti v. Sheriff of Harris County, Texas, 406 F. Supp. 649 (S.D. Tex. 1975).

  • American Association of Correctional Psychologists (1980).Standards for psychology services in adult jails and prisons. Dallas, Texas: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association (1985).Criminal justice mental health standards. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Correctional Association (1981).Standards for adult correctional institutions. College Park, Maryland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association (1979).Standards for health services in prisons. Chicago, Illinois: American Health Care Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J., Folstein, M., Romanoski, A., Von Korff, M., Nestadt, G., Chahal, R., Merchant, A., Hendricks Brown, C., Shapiro, S., Kramer, M., & Gruenberg, E. (1985). Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 667–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M., Feinberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 (4th Cir. 1977).

  • Campbell v. McGruder, 580 F.2d 521, 549 (D.C. Cir. 1978).

  • Cohen, J. (1969).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. J., & Schlenger, W. E. (1983a). The prevalence of psychiatric disorder among admissions to prison. Raw data from NIMH grant R01MH34895.

  • Collins, J. J., & Schlenger, W. E. (1983b, November).The prevalence of psychiatric disorder among admissions to prison. Paper presented at the 35th annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Denver, CO.

  • Collins, J. J., Schlenger, W. E., & Jordan, B. K. (1988). Antisocial personality and substance abuse disorders.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 16, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comptroller General (1980).Report to the congress: Jail inmates' mental health care neglected; state and federal attention needed (GGD-81-5). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson v. Kendrick, 527 F. Supp. 1252 (S.D. W. Va. 1981).

  • Dunn, C. S. (1982). The special national workshop on mental health services in local jails: Background and development. In C. Dunn & H. Steadman (Eds.),Mental health services in local jails: Report of a special national workshop (pp. 1–13). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baton, W., Regier, D., Locke, B., & Taube, C. (1981). The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program of the National Institute of Mental Health.Public Health Reports, 96, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976).

  • Gibbs, J. J. (1982). On “demons” and “gaols”: A summary and review of investigations concerning the psychological problems of jail prisoners. In C. Dunn & H. Steadman (Eds.),Mental health services in local jails: Report of a special national workshop (pp. 14–33). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibist, J. H., Jefferson, J. W., & Spitzer, R. L. (Eds.). (1982).Treatment of mental disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, E., Platt, J. J., Zwerling, I., & Bullock, S. (1985). Mental health status of prisoners in an urban jail.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. L. (1973).Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helzer, J., Robins, L., McEvoy, L., Spitznagel, E., Stoltzman, R., Famer, A., & Brockington, I. (1985). A comparison of clinical and Diagnostic Interview Schedule diagnoses.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 657–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, 487 F. Supp. 638 642–43 (W.D.Pa. 1980).

  • Jones v. Wittenberg, 509 F.Supp. 653 (N.D. Ohio 1980).

  • Kiesler, C. A. (1982). Public and professional myths about mental hospitalization. An empirical reassessment of policy-related beliefs.American Psychologist, 37, 1323–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka, W. (1980).Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H., & Grant, R. (1982). The mentally ill in an urban county jail.Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, D., Steadman, H. J., & Morrissey, J. P. (1982). Issues in planing mental health services.Federal Probation, December, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, B. J., Keeler, E., & Hay, R. A. (1975). Primer on certain elements of medical decisionmaking.New England Journal of Medicine, 293, 212–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1977).Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I., & Carbonell, J. L. (1985). Predicting prison adjustment with MMPI correctional scales.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 874–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (1981). Developing mental services for local jails.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections. (1985).Sourcebook on the mentally disordered prisoner. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health. (1985).Mental Health, United States, 1985 (p. 17), Taube, C. A., & Barrett, S. A. (Eds.), DHHS Publication No. (ADM)85-1378. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1975). The study of change in evaluation research: Principles concerning measurement, experimental design and analysis. In E. Streuning & M. Guttentag (Eds.),Handbook of evaluation research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh v. Locke, 406 F.Supp. 318 (M.D. Alabama, 1976) aff'd in part and modified in part sub. nom. Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, (5th Cir. 1977) remanded on other grounds sub. nom. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978).

  • Robins, L. (1985a).DSM-III/DIS-IIIA diagnostic programs [SAS computer program]. St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. (1985b). Epidemiology: Reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews.Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 918–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L., Helzer, J., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K. (1981a). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics and validity.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L., Helzer, J., Croughan, J., Williams, J., & Spitzer, R. (1981b).The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Version III (Public Health Service Publication ADM-T-42-3). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L., Helzer, J., Ratcliff, K., & Seyfried, W. (1982). Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, version II: DSM-III diagnoses.Psychological Medicine, 12, 855–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz v. Estelle, 503 F.Supp. 1265, 1323 (S.D. Texas, 1980) mot. to stay granted in part and denied in part, 650 F.2d 555 (5th Cir. 1981), aff'd in part and reversed in part, 679 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1982), opinion amended in part and vacated in part, and rehearing denied, 688 F.2d (5th Cir. 1982).

  • Spitzer, R., & Fleiss, J. (1974). A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis.British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (1983).SPSS X user's guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., (1986). The criminalization of the mentally ill: Speculation in search of data.Psychological Bulletin, 94, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A. (1986).Mental disorder in an urban jail: Final Report (NIMH Contract #R01MH32884). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1985).Jail inmates 1983 (Bulletin No. NCJ-99175). Rockville, Maryland: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Keilitz, I., Fitch, W. L., Marvell, T. B. & Holmstrup, M. E. (1981).Forensic mental health screening and evaluation in jails, OPS 3. Williamsburg, Virginia: National Center for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health under grant No. R01MH37988. We would like to thank Karl Kilgore, Stuart Michaels, John Lyons, Karen Abram, Richard White, and Christine Davidson for their statistical insights and helpful comments. James Collins is due special thanks for making his North Carolina prison data available. We are also grateful to Philip Hardiman, Thomas Monahan, and Ronald Simmons for their cooperation with the data-collection process.

About this article

Cite this article

Teplin, L.A., Swartz, J. Screening for severe mental disorder in jails. Law Hum Behav 13, 1–18 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056159

Keywords

Navigation