Skip to main content
Log in

Relative efficiency of ammonium polyphosphate and orthophosphates for wheat and their residual effects on succeeding cowpea fodder

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative efficiency of ortho and polyphosphates as P sources for wheat were studied in a field experiment with five sources—TSP, DAP, NP, APP (solid) and APP (Liquid) at three levels—13, 26 and 39 kg P ha−1 and the residual effect was studied on a succeeding cowpea (fodder). Both the crops were grown each year at same location. Wheat responded upto 39 kg P ha−1 in the first year but only upto 26 kg P ha−1 in the second year. The growth parameters—plant height and dry matter production and yield attributes-ears m−1, grains ear−1 and test weight were favourably influenced by P application. The rate of P uptake initially exceeded the dry matter production. Wheat when fertilized with 26 or 39 kg P ha−1 left behind a significant residual effect to raise the soil P availability and dry matter yield of cowpea. The grain yield of wheat was higher with APP's than with NP or DAP but the residual effect was the highest with NP. The magnitude of build up of soil available P with NP and APP's were similar and higher than DAP or TSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell CA, Read DWL, Winkleman GE and McAndrew DW (1984) First 12 years of a long—term crop rotation study in S.W. Seskatchewan-Biocarbonate—P distribution in soil and P uptake by the plant. Can J Soil Sci 64: 125–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engelstad OP and Terman GL (1967) Importance of water solubility of fertilizer. Fert News 12(7): 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher RA (1983) Growth and yield of field crops—wheat. In—Sym Pot Productivity Field Crops under Different Environments. 22–26 Sept. 1980, IRRI, Philippines, pp 129–154

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haynes RJ (1984) Lime and phosphate in the soil-plant system. Adv Agron 37: 249–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hossner LR and Melton JR (1970) Pyrophosphate hydrolysis of ammonium, calcium and calcium ammonium pyrophosphates in selected Texas Soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 801–805

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson ML (1967) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc. New Jersy, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jung J and Jurgens—Gschwind S (1975) The fertilizing effect of condensed phosphates. Phosphorus Agric 64: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khanna SS and Chaudhury KC (1979) Residual and cumulative effect of phosphatic fertilizers. Bull Indian Soc Soil Sci 12: 142–148

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knap WR and Kanp JS (1978) Response of wheat to date of planting and fall fertilization. Agron J 70: 1048–1053

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra B, Joshi MC, Sharma BL and Singh R (1986) Optimal water soluble P in NP fertilizers. Fert Agric 9: 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Wantabe FS and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus by extraction with NaHCO3. USA Circ 939

  12. Peck TR, Kurtz CT and Tandon HSL (1971) Changes in Bray P-1 soil phosphorus test values resulting from applications of phosphorus fertilizers. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc. 35: 595–598

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prasad R (1980) Response of field crops to different fertilizers in India. In Holms JC, ed. Technology for increasing food production, pp. 228–236, Rome Italy

  14. Prasad R and Aasum E (1985) The Norsk Hydro Nitrophosphate process in India—Aspects of agronomy, economics and technology. Fert Ind Ann Rev 8: 141–157

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prasad R and Dixit LA (1978) Fertilizers containing partially water soluble or no water soluble phosphate. Tech Bull, ICAR, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad R, Sharma SN and Dixit LA (1985) Phosphorus fertilization in an intensive annual cropping of wheat-greengram (or cowpea)-pearl millet. Fert Res 6: 219–224

    Google Scholar 

  17. Relwani LL (1961) Effect of tillage and manuring on the yield of wheat. Indian J Agron 5: 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romer W and Schilling G (1986) Phosphorus requirements of the wheat plant in various stages of its life cycle. Pl Soil 91: 221–229

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tandon HLS (1987) Phosphorus research and agricultural production in India. Ist edn. FDCO, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varvel GE, Merditch HL and Severson RK (1986) Field evaluation of acid-base fertilizer for spring wheat Agron J 78: 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  21. Westerman RL, Wood CI and Nurst R (1986) Response of winter wheat to surface split application of ammonium poly phosphate. J Fert Issues 3: 7–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venugopalan, M.V., Prasad, R. Relative efficiency of ammonium polyphosphate and orthophosphates for wheat and their residual effects on succeeding cowpea fodder. Fertilizer Research 20, 109–114 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055435

Key words

Navigation