Abstract
Confined microplots were used to study the fate of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea when applied to ryegrass in spring at 3 lowland sites (S1, S2 and S3). Urea and differentially and doubly labelled ammonium nitrate were applied at 50 and 100 kg N ha−1. The % utilization of the15N-labelled fertilizer was measured in 3 cuts of herbage and in soil to a depth of 15 cm (soil0–15).
Over all rates, forms and sites, the % utilization values for cuts 1, 2, 3 and soil0–15 were 52.4, 5.3, 2.4 and 16.0% respectively. The % utilization of15N in herbage varied little as the rate of application increased but the % utilization in the soil0–15 decreased as the rate of application increased. The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil0–15 indicated that losses of N increased from 12 to 25 kg N ha−1 as the rate of N application was increased from 50 to 100 kg N ha−1.
The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil0–15 over both rates of fertilizer N application were 84.1, 80.8 and 81.0% for urea compared with 74.9, 72.5 and 74.4% for all ammonium nitrate forms at S1, S2 and S3 respectively. Within ammonium nitrate forms, the total % utilization values in herbage plus soil0–15 over both rates and all sites were 76.7, 69.4 and 75.7% for15NH4NO3, NH4 15NO3 and15NH4 15NO3 respectively. The utilization of the nitrate moiety of ammonium nitrate was lower than the utilization of the ammonium moiety.
The distribution of labelled fertilizer between herbage and soil0–15 varied with soil type. As the total utilization of labelled fertilizer was similar at all sites the cumulative losses due to denitrification and downward movement appeared to account for approximately equal amounts of N at each site.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barraclough D, Geens E L, Davies G P and Maggs J M (1985) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen. III. The use of single and double labelled15N ammonium nitrate to study nitrogen uptake by ryegrass. J Soil Sci 36: 593–603
Bristow A W, Ryden J C and Whitehead D C (1987) The fate at several time intervals of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate applied to an established grass sward. J Soil Sci 38: 245–254
Broadbent F E and Carlton A B (1978) Field trials with isotopically labelled nitrogen fertilizer. In: Nielsen D R and MacDonald J G (eds) Nitrogen in the Environment, Volume 1, pp. 1–41. London: Academic Press
Broadbent F E, Hill G N and Tyler K B (1958) Transformations and movement of urea in soils. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 22: 303–307
Chaney K and Paulson G A (1988) Field experiments comparing ammonium nitrate and urea top-dressing for winter cereals and grassland in the U.K. J Agric Sci Camb 110: 285–299
Fenn L B and Hossner L R (1985) Ammonia volatilization from ammonium or ammonium-forming nitrogen fertilizers. Adv Soil Sci 1: 123–169
Jansson S L and Persson J (1982) Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. In: Stevenson F J (ed.) Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils, pp. 229–252. Madison, Wisc: American Society of Agronomy
Jenkinson D S, Fox R H and Rayner J H (1985) Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen—the so-called ‘priming’ effect. J Soil Sci 36: 425–444
Legg J O and Meisinger J J (1982) Soil nitrogen budgets. In: Stevenson F J (ed.) Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils, pp. 503–566. Madison, Wisc: American Society of Agronomy
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1986) The Analysis of Agricultural Materials, London: HMSO
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1983) Lime and Fertilizer Recommendations No 5. Grass and Forage Crops 1983/84, Booklet 2430, London: HMSO
Murphy W E (1983) Comparing urea and CAN at different locations. Farm Fd Res 14: 41–43
Preston T and Owens N J P (1983) Interfacing an automatic elemental analyser with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer: the potential for fully automated total nitrogen and nitrogen-15 analysis. Analyst 108: 971–977
Ryden J C (1983) Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate. J Soil Sci 34: 355–365
Ryden J C (1984) The flow of nitrogen in grassland. Proc Fert Soc No 229: 44 pp
Stevens R J and Laughlin R J (1988) The effects of times of application and chemical forms on the efficiencies of15N-labelled fertilisers for ryegrass at two contrasting field sites. J Sci Food Agric 43: 9–16
Van Burg P F J, Dilz K and Prins W H (1982) Agricultural value of various nitrogen fertilisers. Netherlands Nitrogen Technical Bulletin No 13: 51 pp
Watson C J (1986) Preferential uptake of ammonium nitrogen from soil by ryegrass under simulated spring conditions. J Agric Sci Camb 107: 171–177
Webster C P and Dowdell R J (1985) A lysimeter study of the fate of nitrogen applied to perennial ryegrass swards: soil analyses and the final balance sheet. J Soil Sci 36: 605–611
Whitehead D C (1970) The Role of Nitrogen in Grassland Productivity. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux
Whitehead D C (1984) Interactions between soil and fertiliser in the supply of nitrogen to ryegrass grown on 21 soils. J Sci Food Agric 35: 1067–1075
Whitehead D C and Dawson K P (1984) Nitrogen, including15N-labelled fertilizer nitrogen, in components of a grass sward. J App Ecol 21: 983–989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stevens, R.J., Laughlin, R.J. A microplot study of the fate of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea applied at two rates to ryegrass in spring. Fertilizer Research 20, 33–39 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055399
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055399