Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A vacuum-operated pore-water extractor for estuarine and freshwater sediments

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vacuum-operated pore-water extractor for estuarine and freshwater sediments was developed and constructed from a fused-glass air stone attached with aquarium airline tubing to a 30 or 60 cc polypropylene syringe. Pore water is extracted by inserting the air stone into the sediment and creating a vacuum by retracting and bracing the syringe plunger. A hand-operated vacuum pump attached to a filtration flask was also evaluated as an alternative vacuum source. The volume and time to extract pore water varies with the number of devices and the sediment particle size. Extraction time is longer for fine sediments than for sandy sediments. Four liters of sediment generally yield between 500 and 1,500 mL of pore water. The sediment that surrounds and accumulates on the air stone acts as a filter, and, except for the first few milliliters, the collected pore water is clear. Because there is no exposure to air or avenue for escape, volatile compounds andin situ characteristics are retained in the extracted pore water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams WJ, Kimerle RA, Mosher RG (1985) Aquatic safety assessment of chemicals sorbed to sediments. In Cardwell RD, Purdy R, Bahner RC (eds) Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Seventh Symposium. ASTM STP 854. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 429–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankley GT, Katko A, Arthur JW (1990) Identification of ammonia as an important sediment-associated toxicant in the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender M, Martin W, Hess J, Sayles F, Ball L, Lambert C (1987) A whole-core squeezer for interfacial pore-water sampling. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1214–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden MA (1931) A study of the respiration and the function of haemoglobin inPlanorbis corneus andArenicola marina. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 17:709–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Brafield A (1964) The oxygen content of interstitial water in sandy shores. J Anim Ecol 33:97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce JR (1928) Physical factors on the sandy beach. Part 1. Tidal, climate and edaphic. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 15:535–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Carignan R, Papin F, Tessier A (1985) Sediment porewater sampling for metal analysis: A comparison of techniques. Geochim Cosmochim Act 49:2493–2497

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr RS, Williams JW, Fragata CTB (1989) Development and evaluation of a novel marine sediment pore toxicity test with the polychaeteDinophilus gryrociliatus. Environ Toxicol Chem 8:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole AF (1932) Method for determining dissolved O2 content of the mud at the bottom of a pond. Ecology 13:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Creaser EP Jr (1971) An interstitial water-sampling receptacle for intertidal mud flats. J Fish Res Board Canada 28:1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies-Colley RJ, Nelson PO, Williamson KJ (1985) Sulfide control of cadmium and copper concentrations in anaerobic estuarine sediments. Mar Chem 16:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutka BJ, Kwan KK (1988) Battery of screening tests approach applied to sediment extracts. Toxic Assess 3:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen C (1963) A method for obtaining interstitial water from shallow aquatic substrata and determining the oxygen concentration. Ecology 44:191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisy JP, Rosiu CJ, Graney RL, Newsted JL, Benda A, Kreis RG, Horvath FJ (1988) Toxicity of Detroit River sediment interstitial water to the bacteriumPhotobacterium phosphoreum. J Great Lakes Res 14:502–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman M (1965) An apparatus for the recovery of interstitial water from recent sediments. Deep-Sea Res 12:225–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesslein RH (1976) Anin situ sampler for close interval pore water studies. Limnol Oceanogr 21:912–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman DL (1952) Measures for describing the size distribution of sediments. J Sed Petrol 22:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida S (1953) Oxygen content of water in contact with sand. J Coll Arts Sci Chiba Univ 1:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke RA (1988) A simple, reliable, and inexpensive pore water sampler. Limnol Oceanogr 33:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RG (1967) Salinity of interstitial water in sandy beach. Limnol Oceonogr 12:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JD (1955) Observations on the respiratory physiology and on the haemoglobin of the polychaete genusNepthys, with special reference toN. hobergii. J Exp Biol 32:110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezovich JP, Harrison FL (1987) A new method for determining the concentrations of volatile organic compounds in sediment interstitial water. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 38:917–940

    Google Scholar 

  • —, — (1988) The bioavailability of sediment sorbed chlorobenzenes to larvae of the midge,Chironomus decorus. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 15:226–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezovich JP, Harrison FL, Wilhelm RG (1987) The bioavailability of sediment-sorbed organic chemicals: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut 32:233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruikov PA, Komarova NA (1954) On squeezing out of water from clay at very high pressures. Akad Nauk USSR Dokl 99:617–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusczynski NJ (1961) Filter-press method of extracting water samples for chloride analysis. U.S. Geol Surv Water Supply Paper, No. 1544-A, 8 pp

  • Makemson JC (1972) An interstitial water sampler for sandy beaches. Limnol Oceonogr 17:626–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim FT (1966) A hydraulic squeezer for obtaining interstitial water from consolidated and unconsolidated sediments. Prof Pap U.S. Geol Surv 550:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DF, Wagner KJ, Monagle WJ, Beluzo GA (1989) A littoral interstitial porewater (LIP) sampler and its use in studying groundwater quality entering a lake. Lake Reservoir Manage 5:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnel JR, Kaplan BM, Allen HE (1985) Bioavailability of trace metals in natural waters. In: Cardwell RD, Purdy R, Bahner RC (eds) Aquatic Toxic Toxicology and Hazardous Assessment: Seventh Symposium. ASTM STP 854. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 485–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak RW (1940) Ecology of the microscopic Metazoa inhabiting the sandy beaches of some Wisconsin lakes. Ecol Monogr 10:537–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Presley BJ, Brooks RR, Kappel HM (1967) A simple squeezer for removal of interstitial water from ocean sediments. J Mar Res 25:355–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Puls RW, Barcelona MJ (1989) Filtration of ground water samples for metals analysis. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials 6:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeburgh WS (1967) An improved interstitial water sampler. Limnol Oceonogr 12:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Saager PM, Sweerts JP, Ellermeijer HJ (1990) A simple pore-water sampler for coarse, sandy sediments of low porosity. Limnol Oceanogr 35:747–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomons W (1985) Sediments and water quality. Environ Technol Letters 6:315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomons W, de Rooij NM, Kerdijk H, Bril J (1987) Sediments as a source for contaminants. Hydrobiologia 149:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles FL, Mangelsdorf PC Jr, Wilson TRS, Hume DN (1976) Instruments and methods: A sampler for thein situ collection of marine sedimentary pore waters. Deep Sea Res 23:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea D (1988) Developing national sediment quality criteria. Environ Sci Technol 22:1256–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuba PJ, Carroll JH, Wong KL (1977) Biological assessment of the soluble fraction of the standard elutriate test. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS. Tech Rep D-77-3, 85 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Siever R (1962) A squeezer for extracting interstitial water from modern sediments. J Sed Petrol 32:329–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC (1987) Partitioning of trace metals in sediments: Relationships with bioavailability. Hydrobiolgia 149:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman RL (1989) A new sampler for collection of interstitial water from sandy sediments. Hydrobiologia 176:1–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fisheries Contaminant Research Center, University of Georgia, School of Forest Resources, 30602, Athens, Georgia, USA

    Parley V. Winger & Peter J. Lasier

Authors
  1. Parley V. Winger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter J. Lasier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winger, P.V., Lasier, P.J. A vacuum-operated pore-water extractor for estuarine and freshwater sediments. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 21, 321–324 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055353

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055353

Keywords

Search

Navigation