Abstract
There are four classes of procedural goods, each of which is an appropriate ground for answering the question: “Is this a fair procedure?” (i) It is unfair not to treat a person with dignity; the dignity goods are self-respect, personal control, and an understanding of the procedures that determine relevant outcomes. (ii) It is unfair to impose upon a person heavy (net) costs, such as overburdened cognitive capacities and high information costs, excessively painful interpersonal conflict, threats beyond those inherent in the situation, and humiliation. (iii) It is unfair to disregard (but not necessarily to violate) the person's own sense of justice, the codes of honor and practice of his own group and culture. And, of course, (iv) it is unfair to use a procedure that does not have the highest probability of achieving distributive or retributive justice. Few of the standard articles of democratic theory (e.g., liberty, equal treatment before the law, rights, and sharing of power) offer sufficient protections for the first three of these procedural goods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, G. A. (1954).The Appeals of Communism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality.J. Abn. Soc. Psychol. 41: 258–290.
Austin, W., and Tobiasen, J. (1984). Legal justice and the psychology of conflict resolution. In Folger, R. (ed.),The Sense of Injustice Plenum Press, New York, pp. 247–252.
Ayllon, T., and Azrin, N. (1968).The Token Economy: A Motivational System for Therapy and Rehabilitation, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York.
Cahn, E. N. (1949).The Sense of Injustice, New York University Press, New York.
Campbell, A. (1981).The Sense of Well-Being in America, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Carey, A. (1967). The Hawthorne studies: A radical critique.Am. Sociol. Rev. 32: 403–416.
Compton Advertising, Inc. (1975).National Survey of the U.S. Economic System: A Study of Public Understanding and Attitudes, Compton, New York.
Cooley, C. H. (1912).Human Nature and the Social Order, Scribner's, New York.
deCharms, R. (1975).Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior, Academic Press, New York.
Deci, E. L. (1975).Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum Press, New York.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive justice and procedural justice: Combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement of experienced inequity.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 108–119.
Friedman, L. N. (1975).The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, Russell Sage, New York.
Glass, D. C., and Singer, J. E. (1972).Urban Stress: Experiments on Noise and Social Stressors, Academic Press, New York.
Glasser, I. (1978). Prisoners of benevolence: Power versus liberty in the welfare state. In Glasser, I., Gaylin, W., Marcus, S., and Rothman, D. (eds.),Doing Good: The Limits of Benevolence, Pantheon, New York.
Harris, R. J., and Joyce, M. A. (1980). What's fair? It all depends on how you ask the question.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 165–179.
Jacob, H. (1965).Justice in America. Little, Brown, Boston.
Katz, D., Gutek, B. A., Kahn, R. L., and Barton, E. (1975).Bureaucratic Encounters: A Pilot Study in the Evaluation of Governmental Services, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kelsen, H. K. (1957).What is Justice?, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Knight, F. (1935).The Ethnics of Competition and Other Essays, Augustus Kelley, New York.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it. In Kohlberg, L. (ed.),The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper & Row, New York.
Lane, R. E. (1985). From political to industrial democracy?Polity 17: 623–648.
Lane, R. E. (1982). Government and self-esteem.Polit. Theory 10: 5–31.
LaTour, S., Houlden, P., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. (1976). Procedure: Transnational perspectives and preferences,Yale Law J. 86: 258–297.
Lerner, M. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior.J. Soc. Issues, 31: 1–19.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of social relationships. In Gergen, K. G., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.),Social Exchange Theory, Wiley, New York.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Lipset, S. M., and Schneider, W. (1983).The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind, Free Press, New York.
Maccoby, M. (1976).The Gamesmen: The New Corporate Leaders, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Magnusson, D. (ed.). (1981).Towards a Psychology of Situations, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland.
Mill, J. S. (1910). Utilitarianism. InUtilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government, Dent, London. (Originally published 1863).
Miller, W. E., Miller, A. E., and Schneider, E. J. (1980).American National Election Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Moore, B. (1978).Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt, Macmillan, New York.
Okun, A. N. (1975).Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Posner, R. A. (1983).The Economics of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pryor, F. L., and Graburn, N. G. (1980). The myth of reciprocity. In Geigen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., and Wirth, R. A. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York.
Rasinski, K. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). Fairness and vote choice in the 1984 presidential election.Am. Polit. Quart. 16: 5–24.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In Folger, R. (ed.),The Sense of Injustice, Plenum Press, New York.
Rescher, N. (1966).Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN.
Roethlisberger, F. J. (1941).Management and Morale, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the Self, Basic Books, New York.
Rosenberg, M., and Simmons, R. G. (1971).Black and White Self-Esteem: The Urban School Child, American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
Sarat, A. (1977). Studying American legal culture: An assessment of survey evidence.Law Soc. Rev. 11: 427–488.
Scheingold, S. A. (1974).The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Schlozman, K. L., and Verba, S. (1979).Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1985). Shedding light on the Hawthorne studies.J. Occup. Behav. 6: 111–130.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). The Interface of cognitive and social psychology. In Harvey, J. H. (ed.),Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluation of their courtroon experience.Law Soc. Rev. 18: 51–74.
Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters.Basic Appl. Psychol. 1: 281–292.
Verba, S., and Orren, G. R. (1985).Equality in America: The View from the Top, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Veroff, J., Douvan, E., and Kulka, R. A. (1981).The Inner Americans: A Self-Portrait from 1957 to 1976, Basic Books, New York.
Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental social Psychology, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York.
Wylie, R. C. (1974).The Self-Concept, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Yuchtman (Yaar), E. (1976). Effects of psychological factors on subjective well-being. In Strumpel, B. (ed.),Economic Means for Human Needs: Social Indicators of Well-Being and Discontent, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, R.E. Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets. Soc Just Res 2, 177–192 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054555