Skip to main content
Log in

The van Hemmen spin glass revisited

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We simulated the van Hemmen spin glass model by multicanonical algorithm. The exact results for this mean-field model are reproduced. Physical quantities such as energy density, specific heat, susceptibility and order parameters are evaluated at all temperatures. We also studied an alternate model with short range interactions, which displays the many-valley picture in 2D for random variables having values ±1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. B. Berg and T. Neuhaus,Phys. Lett. B 267:249 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. M. Torrie and J. P. Valleau,J. Comput. Phys. 23:187 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Berg and T. Neuhaus,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:9 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Berg, U. Hansmann, and T. Neuhaus,Z. Phys. B 90:229 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Janke, B. Berg, and M. Katoot,Nucl. Phys. B 382:649 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Berg, U. Hansmann, and T. Neuhaus,Phs. Rev. B 47:497 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Berg and T. Celik,Phys. Rev. Lett. 69:2292 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Berg and T. Celik,Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 3:125 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Berg, T. Celik, and U. Hansmann,Europhys. Lett. 22:63 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Marinari and G. Parisi,Europhys. Lett. 19:451 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Hansmann and Y. Okamoto, FSU-SCRI-93-12;J. Comp. Chem., submitted.

  12. S. Kirkpatrick, C. P. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi,Science 220:671 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. L. van Hemmen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:409 (1982); A. C. D. van Enter and J. L. van Hemmen,Phys. Rev. A 29:355 (1984); J. L. Van Hemmen, A. C. D. van Enter, and J. Canisius,Z. Phys. B 50:311 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick,Phys. Rev. Lett. 35:1792 (1975);Phys. Rev. B 12:4384 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Binder and A. P. Young,Rev. Mod. Phys. 58:801 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Binder and K. Schroder,Phys. Rev. B 14:2142 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel,Phys. Rev. 96:99 (1954); T. Kasuya,Prog. Theor. Phys. 16:45 (1956); K. Yosida,Phys. Rev. 106:893 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. C. Mattis,Phys. Lett. 56:421 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. N. Bhatt and A. P. Young,Phys. Rev. B 37:5606 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Moregenstern and J. L. van Hemmen,Phys. Rev. B 32:6058 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. B. Griffiths, C.-Y. Weng, and J. S. Langer,Phys. Rev. 149:301 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ph. de Smedt, J. O. Indekeu, and L. Zhang,Physica A 140: 450 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave of the absence from Department of Physics Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Celik, T., Hansmann, U.H.E. & Katoot, M. The van Hemmen spin glass revisited. J Stat Phys 73, 775–788 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054350

Key words

Navigation