Abstract
Status generalization refers to the capacity of status characteristics, such as race, gender, or occupation, to become the basis of social inequality even when such characteristics are not directly relevant to the immediate social interaction. For instance, individuals with positively valued status characteristics are more likely to assume positions of power and prestige than those of lower standing. To date, status generalization has been assumed to arise from stereotyped beliefs that associate positive standing on a status characteristic with positively valued personal attributes. Findings from two studies indicate that the capacity for status characteristics to produce power and prestige orders may also depend on people's need to believe in a just world. In the first study, participants were fortuitously granted a position of either superior or equal power and prestige to another person. Consistent with just world predictions, participants portrayed themselves more positively relative to the other on assessments of personal attributes when they occupied a superior position than when they occupied a position of equal power and prestige. Results from a second study showed that the tendency to link personal attributes with power and prestige standing was strongest for participants who scored high on the Just World Scale. Thus, just world beliefs appear to play a role in status generalization processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, E. (1978). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Cognitive Theories in Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 215–220.
Austin, W., and Hatfield, E. (1980). Equity theory, power, and social justice. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 25–61.
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction.Am. Sociol. Rev. 37: 241–255.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., and Zelditch, M. (1977).Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectations-States Approach, Elsevier, New York.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing organizing processes.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6: 479–508.
Blau, P. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York.
Cohen, R. L. (1986). Power and justice in intergroup relations. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 65–84.
Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and power: An exchange analysis. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 19–41.
Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of stratification.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 955–971.
Dion, K. L., and Dion, K. K. (1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 775–780.
Driskell, J. E. (1982). Personal characteristics and performance expectations.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 45: 229–237.
Knottnerus, J. D. (1988). A critique of expectation states theory: Theoretical assumptions and models of social cognition.Social. Perspect. 31: 420–445.
Langer, E. J., and Benevento, A. (1978). Self-induced dependence.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 886–893.
Lasswell, H. D., and Lerner, D. (1966).World Revolutionary Elites, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lee, M. L., and Ofshe, R. (1981). The impact of behavioural style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 44: 73–82.
Lenski, G. E. (1967). Status inconsistency and the vote: A four nations test.Am. Sociol. Rev. 32: 298–301.
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1: 355–360.
Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.
Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203–210.
Nisbett, R. E., and Ross, L. (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ridgeway, C. L., and Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 603–617.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?J. Soc. Issues 31: 65–90.
Sampson, E. E. (1969). Studies of status congruence. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York.
Sande, G. N., Ellard, J. H., and Ross, M. (1986). Effect of arbitrarily assigned status labels on self-perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 684–689.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980).Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Indentity, and Interpersonal Relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
Stephenson, G. M., and White, J. H. (1968). An experimental study of some effects of injustice on children's moral behaviour.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 4: 460–469.
Stephenson, G. M., and White, J. H. (1970). Privilege, deprivation, and children's moral behaviour: An experimental clarification of the role of investments.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 6: 167–176.
Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. J., and Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 713–719.
Taylor, S. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In Hamilton, D. L. (ed.),Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 189–211.
Webster, M. Jr., and Driskell, J. E. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 220–236.
Webster, M. Jr., and Driskell, J. E. (1983). Beauty as status.Am. J. Sociol. 89: 141.165.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellard, J.H., Bates, D.D. Evidence for the role of the justice motive in status generalization processes. Soc Just Res 4, 115–134 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053242
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053242