Abstract
The use of nuclear fusion to produce fuel for nuclear fission power stations is discussed in the context of a crucial need for future energy options. The fusion hybrid is first considered as an element in the future of nuclear fission power to provide long term assurance of adequate fuel supplies for both breeder and convertor reactors. Generic differences in neutronic characteristics lead to a fuel production potential of fusion-fission hybrid systems which is significantly greater than that obtainable with fission systems alone. Furthermore, cost benefit studies show a variety of scenarios in which the hybrid offers sufficient potential to justify development costs ranging in the tens of billions of dollars. The hybrid is then considered as an element in the ultimate development of fusion electric power. The hybrid offers a near term application of fusion where experience with the requisite technologies can be derived as a vital step in mapping a credible route to eventual commercial feasibility of “pure” fusion systems. Finally, the criteria for assessment of future energy options are discussed with prime emphasis on the need for rational comparison of alternatives. This approach is contrasted with the dual standard too often used in judging the risks and benefits of nuclear power where, for example, rather minor radiological effects are highlighted while much larger exposures to radiation from medical x-rays, airplane travel, color television sets, etc., are ignored. It is concluded that the fusion hybrid deserves a prominent place among new energy resources but that early attention to insure an adequately informed public is a vital ingredient in assuring reasonable prospects of success.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amanda Spake, The nuclear frontier,Mother Jones (September–October, 1979), pp. 20–33.
World Uranium Potential: An International Evaluation (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, December 1978).
Uranium Industry Seminar, October 16–17, 1979, GJO-108, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Grand Junction, Colorado.
Research and development program plan for 1979–1983, overview, EPRI-PS-830-SR (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., July 1978).
Overview and strategy, 1980–1984 Research and Development Program Plan, EPRI-PS 1141-SR (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., July 1979).
Uranium Resources—Production and Demand (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, December 1977).
B. R. Leonard, Jr., A review of fusion-fission (hybrid) concepts,Nucl. Tech. 20:161–178 (December 1973).
D. L. Chapin et al., Feasibility assessment of fusion-fission hybrids—Phase I annual status report, WFPS-TME-80-001 (January 1980).
David Bodansky, Electricity generation choices for the near term,Science 207 (No. 4432):721–728 (February 1980).
Herbert Inhaber, Risk of energy production, AECB 1119 (Rev. 1), Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (March 1978).
R. P. Rose et al., Fusion-driven actinide burner design study, Final Report, Volume 1, EPRI-ER-451 (May 1977).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, R.P. The case for the fusion hybrid. J Fusion Energ 1, 185–196 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050661
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050661