Skip to main content
Log in

Phosphate rock and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as phosphate fertilizers and their dissolution in soil

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field trial was conducted for 3 years to evaluate phosphate rocks and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as fertilizers for permanent pastures. Two reactive phosphate rocks, North Carolina (USA) and Chatham Rise (New Zealand), and an unreactive Florida (USA) were used. The materials were applied to a highly phosphate retentive allophanic soil of medium to high phosphorus status. Single superphosphate was employed as the standard fertilizer. The fertilizers were applied at four rates including a control in the first year and again in the third year. The field design enabled measurement of residual effects as well. All the plots received blanket applications of sulphate. The rate of dissolution of phosphate rock was measured by determining soil inorganic phosphate fractions at the highest rate of fertilizer application.

The reactive phosphate rocks applied with or without sulphur were as effective as superphosphate in the first and third year of the trial respectively under low and medium responsive conditions. The Florida rock was at the best only 55% as effective as superphosphate. When applied after granulating with sulphur the value increased to 72%. In the second year there was no greater residual effect from the phosphate rocks compared with superphosphate. However, in the third year reactive phosphate rocks gave a slightly greater residual effect; averaged over rates of application the yield increase was 23% over control compared with 18% for superphosphate.

The reactive phosphate rocks, applied with or without sulphur, dissolved at the rate of 44% of that added in the first year and 62% of that remaining in the second year. The corresponding values for Florida rock were 27% and 30%, and for Florida with elemental sulphur 35% and 33%. Over 3 years about 96% of the reactive rocks dissolved compared with 56% and 78% in the case of Florida and Florida with sulphur respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer FC (1978) Comparison of different forms of phosphate fertilizers. Part II: Grassland. J Soil Sci 29, 277–285

    Google Scholar 

  2. Attoe OJ and Olsen RA (1966) Factors affecting rate of oxidation in soils of elemental sulphur and that added in rock phosphate-sulphur fusions. Soil Sci 101, 317–324

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes JS and Kamprath EJ (1975) Availability of North Carolina rock phosphate applied to soils. North Carolina Agricultural Station Technical Bulletin 229

  4. Basson WD (1976) Nitrogen and phosphorus determinations in animal feeds on a continuous flow system. Lab Prac 25, 763–765

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charleston AG (1984) Solubilities of single superphosphate components in water, 2% citric acid, and neutral ammonium citrate solutions. New Zeal J Sci 27, 269–277

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chien SH (1979) Dissolution of phosphate rocks in solutions and soils. International Fertiliser Development Centre, Alabama, USA, Special Publication S-1, pp. 97–129

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chien SH and Black CA (1975) The activity concept of phosphate rock solubility. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39, 856–858

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chien SH, Clayton WR and McClellan GH (1980) Kinetics of dissolution of phosphate rocks in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am 44, 260–264

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davies GR (1984) Comparison of water-insoluble phosphate fertilizers with superphosphate — a review. J Sci Food Agri 35, 265–271

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hammond LL (1979) Agronomic measurements of phosphate rock effectiveness. International Fertiliser Development Centre, Alabama, USA, Special Publication S-1, pp 147–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khasawneh FE and Doll EC (1978) The use of phosphate rock for direct application to soils. Adv Agron 30, 159–206

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kittams HA and Attoe OJ (1965) Availability of phosphorus in rock phosphatesulphur fusions. Agron J 57, 331–334

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lynch PB (1966) Conduct of field experients. New Zealand Department of Agriculture, Bulletin No 399

  14. Mackay AD, Gregg PEH and Syers JK (1984) Field evaluation of Chatham Rise phosphorite as a phosphatic fertilizer for pasture. New Zeal J agric Res 27, 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mackay AD, Springett JA, Syers JK and Gregg PEH (1983) Origin of the effect of earthworms on the availability of phosphorus in a phosphate rock. Soil Biol Biochem 15, 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen SR, Cole CW, Watanabe, F and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture circular 939

  17. Quin BF (1981) Performance of reactive phosphate rocks on irrigated and nonirrigated pasture. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Occasional Report No 3, pp. 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quin BF (1982) The quality of New Zealand superphosphate. New Zeal Agri Sci 16, 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rajan SSS (1983) Effect of sulphur content of phosphate rock/sulphur granules on the availability of phosphate to plants. Fert Res 4, 287–296

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rajan SSS (1985) Partial acidulation of an “unground” phosphate rock: II. Plant availability of phosphate. Fert Res (in press)

  21. Rajan SSS (1986) Partially acidulated phosphate rocks as phosphate fertilisers and the dissolution in soil of the residual rock. New Zeal J exp Agri (submitted)

  22. Rajan SSS and Gillingham AG (1985) Phosphate rocks and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as phosphate fertilizers for a hill country pasture. New Zeal J Agri Res (in press)

  23. Roberts OT and Evans L (1979) Plant response and solubility of phosphates. Proceedings of the New Zealand Fertiliser Manufacturers' Association Seventh Technical Conference, pp 305–320

  24. Russell JS (1960) Soil fertility changes in the long term experimental plots at Kybybolite, South Australia. II: Changes in phosphous. Aust J Agric Res 11, 927–947

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saunders WMH (1959) Effect of phosphate topdressing on a soil from andesitic volcanic ash. II: Effect on distribution of phosphorus and on related chemical properties. New Zeal J Agric Res 2, 445–462

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saunders WMH and Metson AJ (1971) Seasonal variation of phosphorus in soil and pasture. New Zeal J Agric Res 14, 307–328

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saunders WMH, Taylor WB and Gold B (1963) Residual effect of phosphate topdressing on a yellow-brown loam from andesitic ash. New Zeal J Agric Res 6, 484–507

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scott RS and Cullen NA (1965) Some residual effects of phosphatic fertilizers. New Zeal J Agric Res 8, 652–666

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smyth TJ and Sanchez PA (1982) Phosphate rock dissolution and availability in Cerrado soils as affected by phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46, 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swaby RJ (1975) Biosuper-biological superphosphate. In: Sulphur in Australasian Agriculture (ed. K.D. McLachlan), pp 213–220. Sydney University Press

  31. Williams JDH, Syers JK and Walker TW (1967) Fractionation of soil inorganic phosphate by a modification of Chang and Jackson's procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 31, 736–739

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson M and Ellis BG (1984) Influence of calcium solution activity and surface area on the solubility of selected rock phosphates. Soil Sci 138, 354–359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajan, S. Phosphate rock and phosphate rock/sulphur granules as phosphate fertilizers and their dissolution in soil. Fertilizer Research 11, 43–60 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049563

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049563

Key words

Navigation