Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a more interdisciplinary research agenda: The potential contributions of sociology

  • Social Science Perspectives On Justice
  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews some current trends in the sociological literature on distributive justice, emphasizing recent attempts to link stratification research and theories of distributive justice. In particular, research on the perceived justice and legitimacy of inequality (especially income inequality) is discussed. A description of several key unresolved issues which could benefit from interdisciplinary inquiry is also presented. Suggested topics for future research include: the emergence of norms of distributive justice, the conditions under which inequality is perceived as legitimate and just, and the link between collective action and perceptions of distributive and procedural justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1987). Sex bias in job evaluation: A comparable worth issue. In Bose, C., and Spitze, G. (eds.),Ingredients for women's Employment Policy SUNY Press, New York, pp. 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1986). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D., Shepelak, N., Wolfarth, L., and Morgan, D. (1980). Individual responses to inequity: Evaluating normative conceptions of justice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York.

  • Alves, W. M., and Rossi, P. H. (1978). Who should get what? fairness judgements of the distribution of earnings.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 541–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. M. (1980). Consensus and dissensus in the attribution of status and equity: comment on Nock and Rossi and Alves and Rossi.Am. J. Sociol. 86: 641–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: a status value formulation. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.),Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R., and Wagner, D. (1983). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York, pp. 127–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1982). Perceiving justice: An attributional perspective. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1986).Justice: Views From the Social Sciences Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1985). The emergence of social norms. Paper presented at Colloquium Series, University of Washington.

  • Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations and equity.Am. Sociol. Rev. 40: 372–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power equity and commitment in exchange networks.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 721–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity and equality.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 9: 217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and power: An exchange analysis. In Bierhoff, H., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Parcel, T. L. (1977). Equity theory: Directions for future research.Sociol. Inq. 47: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Hegtvedt, K. A., and Yamagishi, T. (forthcoming). Structural inequality, legitimation and reactions to inequity in exchange networks. In Webster, M., and Foschi, M. (eds.),Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth: self-evaluation and the legitimacy of social stratification.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 955–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry, J. S. (1960). Comment. InUniversities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange therory.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 2: 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartrell, C. D. (1982). On the visibility of wage referents.Can. J. Sociol. 7: 117–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (1982).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1980). The emergence of norms.Ethics 90: 575–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1987). Social justice in the large and small.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality?Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 69: 594–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. I., Roos, P. A., and Treiman, D. J. (1985). An agenda for basic research on comparable worth. In Hartmann, H. I. (ed.),Comparable Worth: New Directions for Research National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. (1974).Rational Choice and Social Exchange Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Applying social psychological conceptions of justice to policy: analysis of the comparable worth debate. Presented at the International Conference on Social Justice, Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Hochschild, J. (1981).What's Fair? American Beliefs About Distributive Justice Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms 2nd ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1978). On the justice of earnings: a new specification of the justice evaluation function.Am. J. Sociol. 83: 1398–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1983). Social consequences of the sense of distributive justice: small group applications. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., and Rossi, P. H. (1977). Distributive justice and earned income.Am. J. Sociol. 42: 639–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981).Essays in Moral Development, Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive in social behavior: introduction.J. Soc. Issues 31: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. (1981).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 822–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M., and Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: a conceptual framework.Rev. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 5: 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., and Murray, A. (1983). Distributive justice and unfair exchange. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Theories of Equity: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, A. M. (1984). The two social psychologies: Postcrises directions.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 10: 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.). (1983).Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases, chap. 4. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1980).Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions From Psychological Research Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonet, P., and Selznick, P. (1978).Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State and Utopia Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. V., and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success and social justice in England and the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P., and Nock, S. (1982).Measuring Social Judgements: The Factorial Survey Approach Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytina, S. (1986). The sociology of justice. In Cohen, R. L. (ed.),Justice: Views From the Social Sciences Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1973).On Economic Inequality Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepelak, N. S., and Alwin, D. F. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltan, K. E. (1982). Empirical studies of distributive justice.Ethics 92: 673–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltan, K. E. (1983). What's fair? American beliefs about distributive justice: A book review.Am. J. Sociol. 88: 1046–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1966). A metric for the social consensus.Science 151: 530–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolte, J. (1983). The legitimization of structural inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., and Williams, R. M. (1949).The American Soldier. I: Adjustment During Army Life Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasnick, S. (1975). Preference, priority, and the maximization of social welfare. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Tallman, I., and Ihinger-Tallman, M. (1979). Values, distributive justice and social change.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L. C. (1981). The illusion of economic necessity. In Solo, R. A., and Anderson, C. W. (eds.),Value Judgement and Income Distribution Praeger, New York, pp. 250–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1987). Procedural justice research.Soc. Justice Res. 1: 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornbloom, K. Y. (1977a). Distributive justice: typology and propositions.Hum. Rel. 30: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornbloom, K. Y. (1977b). Magnitude and source of compensation in two situations of distributive justice.Acta Sociol. 29: 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornbloom, K. Y. (1982). Reversal in preference responses to two types of injustice situations: a methodological contribution to equity theory.Hum. Rel. 35: 991–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977).The Emergence of Norms Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M. K., and Kidd, R. F. (1980). Equity and attribution. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction Springer, New York, pp. 63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, G. H. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A., Marks, G., and Jones, G. A. (1981). Luck vs. effort attributions: effect on reward allocations to self and other.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 7: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology.Am. J. Sociol. 26: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, K.S. Toward a more interdisciplinary research agenda: The potential contributions of sociology. Soc Just Res 1, 5–18 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049381

Key words

Navigation