Skip to main content
Log in

Ideology, voting, and shirking

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since we first raised the issue in 1979, scholars have addressed two questions regarding ideology and congressional voting. Does ideology have an impact on such voting? Do representatives shirk by voting their own ideology rather than their constituents' interests? For the first question, it appears that there is a consensus that ideology does matter, although we present some confirming evidence for 1980. The second question has been confused; some think that ideology and shirking are identical, although they are logically separate categories. We show that even if ideological shirking exists, it is relatively unimportant. We also show that self interested (non-ideological) shirking exists. We conclude that research efforts to untangle constituents' and representatives' separate ideologies have been misguided and that further efforts to examine the determinants of constituent ideology should be pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Petroleum Institute (1982).Basic petroleum data book. Washington, DC.

  • Aranson, P. (1991).Ideology and policy. Emory University.

  • Barone, M. and Ujifusa, G. (Eds.) (1982).Almanac of American politics. Washington: Barone and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. and Irons, M.D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why.Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2): 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly, various issues.

  • Council of Economic Advisers (1982).Economic report of the President. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W.R. and Munger, M.C. (1989). The rationality of ideology.Journal of Law and Economics (32): 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957).An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Election Commission (1980).FEC reports on financial activity, 1979–80. Washington, DC: FEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (1991). Elections and the economy in the 1980s: Short- and long-term effects. In A. Alesina and G. Carliner (Eds.),Politics and economics in the eighties, 17–38. University of Chicago Press (National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Jacobson, G.C. (1980).Money in congressional elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P. and Zupan, M.A. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics.American Economic Review 74: 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P. and Zupan, M.A. (1990). The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal-agent slack in political institutions.Journal of Law and Economics 33 (1): 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B., Keenan, D. and Rubin, P.H. (1982). A general equilibrium model of congressional voting.Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1978). Voting on minimum wages: A time series analysis.Journal of Political Economy 86: 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1979). Self interest, ideology and logrolling in congressional voting.Journal of Law and Economics 22: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1982).Congressmen, constituents, and contributors. Boston: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1984). Economic and ideological factors in congressional voting: The 1980 Election.Public Choice 44: 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R., Jr. (1991). Does additional campaign spending really hurt incumbents?: The theoretical importance of past investments in political brand name.Public Choice 72: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R., Jr. and Davis, M.L. (1992). A critical review and extension of the political shirking literature.Public Choice 74: 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. (1989).Public Choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1991). Voting and imitative behavior. Mimeo. SUNY Binghampton.

  • Olson, M. (1965).The Logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation.Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting.Journal of Law and Economics 27(1): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1985). An economic interpretation of the history of congressional voting in the twentieth century.American Economic Review 75 (4): 656–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.L. and Romer, T. (1985). Patterns of Political Action Committee contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the United States House of Representatives.Publich Choice (Carnegie Papers on Political Economy).

  • Posner, R.A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation.Bell Journal of Economics 5 (2): 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. and Strauss, R.P. (1975). Estimation of models with jointly dependent qualitative variables: A simultaneous logit approach.Econometrica 43: 745–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. and Strauss R.P. (1976). The effect of unions on earnings and earnings on unions: A mixed logit approach.International Economic Review 17 (1): 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1950).Capitalism, socialism and democracy, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1976). Do economists matter?Southern Economic Journal 42 (3): 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Authors names are in alphabetical order.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kau, J.B., Rubin, P.H. Ideology, voting, and shirking. Public Choice 76, 151–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049347

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049347

Keywords

Navigation