Skip to main content
Log in

Prescriptions for justice: Using social accounts to legitimate the exercise of professional control

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a field study in which pharmacists had to decide whether to fill a potentially erroneous prescription, and how much information to share with their client about the prescription. The study examined the extent to which the pharmacists relied upon professional, organizational, and legal accounts in explaining their actions to clients. The pharmacists faced a prototypical professional dilemma in balancing the client's desire for information and treatment, professional and organizational standards of conduct, physician's desire for collegial protection, and multiparty interest in legal liabilities (i.e., the pharmacist, their employer, the physician). By examining how these professionals resolved this dilemma, the study contributes to our understanding of how individuals are able to draw selectively on a variety of institutionalized norms to make their potentially questionable actions appear more just.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988).The System of Professions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abelson, R. P., Leddo, J., and Gross, P. H. (1987). The strength of conjunctive explanations.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 13: 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R., Sheppard, B., and Bazerman, M. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts.Soc. Just. Res. 1: 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Acad. Manage. J. 31: 676–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., and Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Commun. Res. 15: 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., and Sitkin, S. B. (1991). Explanation as legitimation: Excuse-making in organizations. In McLaughlin, M., Cody, M., and Read, S. (eds.),Explaining One's Self to Others: Reason-Giving in a Social Context. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E. (1986). The processing of crisis and non-crisis strategic issues.J. Manage. Studies 23: 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employ. Respons. Rights J. 2: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K. and Ferris, G. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Martin, J. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22: 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., and Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrity, M. S., Earp, J. L., DeVellis, R. F., and Light, D. W. (1992). Uncertainty and professional work: Perceptions of physicians in clinical protocol.Am. J. Sociol. 97: 1022–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 389–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organization justice theories.Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 111–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1967). Some organizational considerations in the professional-organizational relationship.Adminis. Sci. Quart. 12: 461–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepler, C. D. (1985). Pharmacy as a clinical profession.Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 42: 1298–1306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, F. M., Cude, R. L., House, A., Lee, J., and Roth, N. L. (in press). Communication competence in organizations: Conceptualization and comparison across multiple levels of analysis. In Thayer, L. (ed.),Organization ↔ Communication: Emerging Perspective, Vol. 4, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

  • Janis, I. L., and Hovland, C. I. (1959). An overview of persuasibility research. In Hovland, C., and Janis, I. L. (eds.), Personality and persuasibility, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kun, A., and Weiner, B. (1973). Necessary vs. sufficient causal schemata for success and failure. J. Res. Pers. 7: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leddo, J., and Abelson, R. P. (1986). The nature of explanations. In Galambos, J. A., Abelson, R. P., and Black, J. B. (eds.),Knowledge Structures, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leddo, J., Abelson, R. P., and Gross, P. H. (1984). Conjunctive explanations: When two reasons are better than one.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47: 933–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A., and Stangor, C. (1984). Why versus how often: Causal reasoning and the incidence of judgmental bias.J. Exp. Psychol. 20: 470–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1981). Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice in an era of shrinking resources. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., and Meindl, J. R. (1984). Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control.Admin. Sci. Quart. 29: 238–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980).Impression Management: The Self Concept, Social Identify, and Interpersonal Relations, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., and Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts.Am. Sociol. Rev. 33: 46–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1982). Managing professional work: Three models of control for health organizations.Health Serv. Res. 17: 213–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L. (1991). The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit.Adminis. Sci. Quart. 36: 614–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H. (1984). Third-party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Secrecy norms in organizational settings. Manuscript under review.

  • Sitkin, S. B., and Bies, R. J. (1993). Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict.Hum. Relat. 46: 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., and Sutcliffe, K. M. (1991). Dispensing legitimacy: The influence of professional, organizational, and legal controls on pharmacist behavior. In Tolbert, P., and Barley, S. (eds.),Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 8, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 265–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., Reed, G. L., and Sutcliffe, K. M. (1987). Organizational and legal justifications for disclosive and non-disclosive behavior: An empirical study of pharmacist's use of social accounts. Paper presented at National Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.

  • Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Barrios-Choplin, J. R. (1992). A dual capacity model of communication media choice in organizations.Human Commun. Res. 18: 563–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., and Stucky, R. J. (1983).Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace Wiley/Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., and Rafaeli, A. (1988). Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores.Acad. Manage. J. 31: 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice.J. Pers. Social Psychol. 52: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. S. (ed.),Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1985). A stress analysis of future battlefields. In Hunt, J. G. (ed.),Leadership and Future Battlefields Pergamon Brassey, Washington, DC, pp. 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Folkes, V. S., Amirkhan, J., and Verette, J. A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse-giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion.J. Pers. Social Psychol. 52: 316–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 726–743.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sitkin, S.B., Sutcliffe, K.M. & Reed, G. Prescriptions for justice: Using social accounts to legitimate the exercise of professional control. Soc Just Res 6, 87–111 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048734

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048734

Key words

Navigation