Abstract
This paper advances the argument that individual privacy is a procedural justice issue in organizations. A review of the organizational privacy literature supports this argument, and new directions for procedural justice research are suggested. In addition, it is argued that a focus on individual privacy highlights the political and paradoxical implications of procedural justice issues in organizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaney, W. M. (1966). The right to privacy and American Law.Law Contemp. Prob. 31: 253–271.
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289–319.
Bies, R. J. (1992). The manager as intuitive politician: Blame management in the delivery of bad news. Unpublished manuscript.
Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.
Bies, R. J., and Tripp, T. M. (in press). Employee-initiated defamation lawsuits: Organizational responses and dilemmas.Employ. Respons. Rights J.
Bloustein, E. J. (1964). Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: An answer to Dean Prosser.NYU Law Rev. 39: 962–1007.
Brehm, J. W. (1972).Responses to Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.
Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.
Culnan, M. M., Bies, R. J., and Smith, H. J. (in press). Law, privacy, and organizations: The corporate obsession to know v. the individual right not to be known. In Sitkin, S. B., and Bies, R. J. (eds.),The Legalistic Organization, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.J. Person. Social Psychol. 35: 108–119.
Folger, R., and Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employ. Respons. Rights J. 2: 79–90.
Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K., and Ferris, G. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141–183.
Forkosch, M. D. (1958). American democracy and procedural due process.Brooklyn Law Rev. 24: 173–253.
Fusilier, M. R., and Hoyer, W. D. (1980). Variables affecting perceptions of invasion of privacy in a personnel selection situation.J. Appl. Psychol. 65: 623–626.
Greenberg, J. (1983). Overcoming the egocentric bias in perceived fairness through self-awareness.Social Psychol. Quart. 46: 152–156.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 340–342.
Greenberg, J. (1987a). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9–22.
Greenberg, J. (1987b). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means?J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 55–61.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.J. Appl. Psychol. 75: 561–568.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.J. Manage. 16: 399–432.
Greenberg, J., Bies, R. J., and Eskew, D. E. (1991). Establishing fairness in the eye of the beholder: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Giacalone, R. A., and Rosenfeld, P. (eds.),Applying Impression Management: How Image Making Affects Managerial Decision Making, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 111–132.
Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (ed.),Basic Group Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.
Guion, R. M. (1967). Personnel selection.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 18: 191–216.
Harris, L., and Westin, A. F. (1979).The Dimensions of Privacy: A National Opinion Research Survey of Attitudes Toward Privacy, Sentry Insurance Company, Stevens Point, WI.
Hoerr, J., Hafner, K. M., DeGeorge, G., Field, A. R., and Zinn, L. (1988, March 28). Privacy.Bus. Week, pp. 61–68.
Ilgen, D. R., Fischer, C. D., and Taylor, S. M. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.J. Appl. Psychol. 64: 349–371.
Jourard, S. M. (1966). Some psychological aspects of privacy.Law Contemp. Prob. 31: 307–318.
Katz, J. E., and Tassone, A. R. (1990). Public opinion trends: Privacy and information technology.Publ. Opin. Quart. 54: 125–143.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–55.
LeRoy, M. H. (1990). Drug testing in the public sector: Union member attitudes.J. Collec. Negot. Publ. Sector 19: 165–173.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
Marx, G. T., and Sherizen, S. (1987). Corporations that spy on their employees.Bus Soc. Rev. 60: 32–37.
Masters, M. F., Ferris, G. R., and Ratcliff, S. L. (1988). Practices and attitudes of substance abuse testing.Pers. Adminis. 33: 72–78.
No yelling. (1985, March 5).Wall Street J., p. 1.
Rosenbaum, B. L. (1973). Attitude toward invasion of privacy in the personnel selection process and job applicant demographic and personality correlates.J. Appl. Psychol. 58: 333–338.
Schein, V. E. (1977). Individual privacy and personnel psychology: The need for a broader perspective.J. Social Issues, 33: 154–167.
Schwartz, J. (1991, June 3). How did they get my name?Newsweek, pp. 40–42.
Scott, M. B., and Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts.Am. Sociol. Rev. 33: 46–62.
Selznick, P. (1969).Law, Society, and Industrial Justice, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Simmons, D. D. (1968). Invasion of privacy and judged benefit of personality test inquiry.J. Gen. Psychol. 79: 177–181.
Sitkin, S. B., and Bies, R. J. (in press—a). Social accounts in conflict situations: On using explanations to manage conflict.Hum. Rela.
Sitkin, S. B., and Bies, R. J. (in press—b). The legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions, and dilemmas.Organ. Sci.
Solomon, J. (1989, April 19). As firms' personnel files grow, worker privacy falls.Wall Street J. p. B1.
Stone, D. L., and Bowden, C. (1989). Effects of job applicant drug testing practices on reactions to drug testing. In Hoy, F. (ed.),Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA, pp. 290–294.
Stone, D. L., and Kotch, D. (1989). Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices.J. Appl. Psychol. 74: 518–521.
Stone, D. L., and Stone, E. F. (1987). Effects of missing application blank information on personnel selection decisions: Do privacy protection strategies bias the outcome?J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 452–456.
Stone, E. F., and Stone, D. L. (1990). Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms. In Rowland, K. M., and Ferris, G. R. (eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 349–411.
Stone, D. L., O'Brien, J. E., and Bommer, W. (1989, June). Individuals' reactions to job applicant drug testing practices. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
Susser, P. A. (1988). Electronic monitoring in the private sector: How closely should employers supervise their workers?Employ. Rela. Law J. 13: 575–598.
Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups, Wiley, New York.
Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R., and Fromkin, H. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment.J. Appl. Psychol. 66: 308–313.
Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. S. (ed.),Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77–98.
Vidmar, N., and Flaherty, D. H. (1985). Concern for personal privacy in an electronic age.J. Commun. 35: 91–103.
Warren, S. D., and Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy.Harv. Law Rev. 4: 289–320.
Westin, A. F. (1967).Privacy and Freedom, Atheneum, New York.
Woodman, R. W., Ganster, D. C., Adams, J., McCuddy, M. C., Tolchinsky, P. D., and Fromkin, H. (1982). A survey of employee perceptions of information privacy in organizations.Acad. Manage. J. 25: 647–663.
Zalud, B. (1989). The conflicts of privacy.Security 26: 38–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bies, R.J. Privacy and procedural justice in organizations. Soc Just Res 6, 69–86 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048733
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048733