Abstract
Research-based knowledge of the effects of affirmative action has been little help to policy makers. That is the case because there has been no means through which to organize into a policy-relevant whole the findings that have come from a variety of disciplinary sources. A heuristic schematic of the “psychological ecology of affirmative action” is proposed as a step toward developing a conceptual framework that can reduce this problem. A psychological ecology of affirmative action consists of the mutual relations between policy interest groups and the procedures used to implement these policies. A critical point that the ecological framework leads to is that the nature of affirmative action procedures has a major influence on the material and subjective links between interest groups. Given that claim, the schematic is used to categorize, review, and critique the multidisciplinary research on affirmative action. From that overview, a set of general guidelines for the design of effective affirmative action programs is proposed. Finally, a call is made for a shift in the unit of policy analysis from a focus on group justice to relational justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, W., Friedman, J. S., Martz, R. A., Hooe, G. S. and Ball, K. P. (1977). Responses to favorable sex discrimination.Law Hum. Behav. 1, 283–293.
Barnes Nacoste, R. W. (1990). Sources of stigma: Analyzing the psychology of affirmative action.Law Policy 12: 175–195.
Barnes Nacoste, R. W., and Powell, T. E. (1991). Quotas as procedure: Affirmative action and its discontents. Paper presented at the 98th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
Braddock, J. H., II, and McPartland, J. M. (1987). How minorities continue to be excluded from equal employment opportunities: Research on labor market and institutional barriers.J. Soc. Issues 43: 5–30.
Brooks, R. L. (1990).Rethinking the American race problem University of California Press, Berkeley.
Bunzel, J. H. (1988). Affirmative-action admissions: How it “works” at UC Berkeley.Public Interest 93: 111–129.
Chacko, T. I. (1982). Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects.J. Appl. Psychol. 67: 119–123.
Combs, M. W. and Gruhl, J. (1986).Affirmative action: Theory, analysis and prospects McFarland, Jefferson, NC.
Crosby, F., and Clayton, S. (1990). Affirmative action and the issue of expectancies.J. Soc. Issues 46: 61–79.
Deutsch, M. (1954). Field theory in social psychology. In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 412–487.
Eagly, A. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis.Am. Psychol. 38: 971–981.
Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In Cohen, R. (ed.),Justice: Views from the Social Sciences Academic Press, New York, pp. 153–194.
Garcia, L. T., Erskine, N., Hawn, K., and Casmay, S.R. (1981). The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority members.J. Pers. 49: 427–437.
Hacker, A. (1989, October 12). Affirmative action: The new look.N.Y. Rev. Books 36: 63–68.
Heckman, J. J. (1989). The impact of government on the economic status of black Americans. In Shulman, S., and Darity, W., Jr. (eds),The Question of Discrimination: Racial Inequality in the U.S. Labor Market Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT, pp. 50–80).
Heilman, M. E., Simon, M. C., and Repper, D.P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations.J. Appl. Psychol. 72: 62–68.
Heilman, M. E., Lucas, J. A., and Kaplow, S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Proc. 46: 202–216.
Hitt, M. A., and Keats, B. W. (1984). Empirical identification of the criteria for effective affirmative action programs.J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 20: 203–222.
Jacobsen, C. (1985). Resistance to affirmative action: Self-interest or racism.J. Conflict Resolution 28: 306–328.
Johnson, S. D. (1980). Reverse discrimination and aggressive behavior.J. Psychol. 104: 11–19.
Jones, S. H., and Cook, S. W. (1975). The influence of attitude on judgments of the effectiveness of alternative social policies.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32: 767–773.
Katz, I. (1970). Experimental studies of negro-white relationships. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–117.
Kinder, D. R., and Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks.Soc. Cog. 8: 73–103.
Kluegel, J. R., and Smith, E.R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects if self-interest, racial affect and stratification beliefs on whites' views.Soc. Forces 61: 797–823.
Kroeck, K. G., Barrett, G. V., and Alexander, R. A. (1983). Imposed quotas and personnel selection: A computer simulation study.J. Appl. Psychol. 68: 123–136.
Leonard, J. S. (1984). Antidiscrimination or reverse discrimination: The impact of changing demographics, Title VII, and affirmative action on productivity.J. Hum. Resources 19: 145–174.
Lewin, K. (1951). Psychological ecology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.),Field Theory in Social Science Harper, New York, pp. 170–187.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics.Hum. Rel. 1: 2–38.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice Plenum Press, New York.
Lovrich, N. P., Steel, B. S., and Hood, D. (1986). Equity versus productivity: Affirmative action and municipal police services.Public Product. Rev. 39: 61–72.
Marsh, J. C. (1985). Obstacles and opportunities in the use of research on rape legislation. In Shotland, R. L., and Mark, M. M. (eds.),Social Science and Social Policy Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 295–310.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1985). Implementation realities and evaluation design. In Shotland, R. L., and Mark, M. M. (eds.),Social Science and Social Policy Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 96–120.
Murray, C. (1988).In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government Simon and Schuster, New York.
Nacoste, R. W. (1985). Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action: The case of favorable treatment.Law and Hum. Behav. 9: 225–242.
Nacoste, R. W. (1987a). But do they care about fairness?: The dynamics of preferential treatment and minority interest.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 177–185.
Nacoste, R. W. (1987b). Social Psychology and affirmative action: The importance of process in policy analysis.J. Soc. Issues 43: 127–132.
Nacoste, R. W. (1989). Affirmative action and self-evaluation. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 103–109.
Nacoste, R. W., and Lehman, D. R. (1987). Procedural stigma.Represent. Res. Soc. Psychol. 17: 25–38.
Olmstead, A. L., and Sheffrin, S. M. (1981). Affirmative action in medical schools: Econometric evidence and legal doctrine. In Zerbe, R. O. (ed.),Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 3, JAI, Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 207–223.
Osterman, P. (1982). Affirmative action and opportunity: A study of female quit rates.Rev. Econ. Statist. 54: 604–612.
Pepitone, A. (1986). Lewin and social science: A theoretical note. In Stivers, E., and Wheelan, S. (eds.),The Lewin Legacy: Field Theory in Current Practice Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 65–69.
Pettigrew, T. F., and Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for black American inclusion.J. Soc. Issues 43: 41–78.
Rosen, B., and Mericle, M. F. (1979). Influence of strong versus weak fair employment policies and applicant's sex on selection decisions and salary recommendations in a management simulation.J. Appl. Psychol. 64: 435–439.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (1984). What have policy studies told us about affirmative action and where can we go from here?Policy Stud. Rev. 4: 43–48.
Rothbart, M. (1976). Achieving racial equality: An analysis of resistance to social reform. In Katz, P. A., (ed.),Toward the elimination of racism Pergamon, New York, pp. 341–375.
Slack, J. D. (1987). City managers, policy chiefs, and fire chiefs in the South: Testing for determinants and impact of attitudes toward affirmative action.Rev. Public Pers. Admin. Fall: 11–32.
Steel, B. S., and Lovrich, N., Jr. (1987). Equality and efficiency tradeoffs in affirmative action-Real or imagined? The case of women in policing.Soc. Sci. J. 24: 53–70.
Stephan, W. (1985). Intergroup relations. In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Random House, New York, pp. 599–658.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics.Psychol. Rev. 91: 457–477.
Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure.California Law Rev. 66: 541–566.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1989). Who likes affirmative action: Attitudinal processes among men and women. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative action ln perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 111–124.
Twiss, C., Tabb, S., and Crosby, F.J. (1989). Affirmative action and aggregate data: The importance of patterns in the perception of discrimination. In Blanchard, F.A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 159–167.
Tyler, T. R. (1990a).Why People Obey the Law Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Tyler, T. R. (1990b). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 830–838.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinki, K., and McGraw, K. (1985). The influence of perceived injustice on support for political authorities.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 700–725.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (1977).Statement on Affirmative Action Clearinghouse Publication 54, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Walker, L., and Lind, E. A. (1984). Psychological studies of procedural models. In Stephenson, G. M., and Davis, J. H. (eds.),Progress in Applied Social Psychology Wiley, New York, pp. 293–313.
Welch, F. (1989). Affirmative action and discrimination. In Shulman, S., and Darity, E., Jr. (eds),The Question of Discrimination: Racial Inequality in the U.S. Labor Market Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT, pp. 153–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nacoste, R.B. Toward a psychological ecology of affirmative action. Soc Just Res 5, 269–289 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048667
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048667