Abstract
The first part of this paper sketches a profile of women who endorse affirmative action, showing that women who approve of affirmative action identify with a nontraditional image of women and experience discontent when perceiving discrimination on the basis of sex. We also examine the impact of the implementing procedure. Studies conducted with French-Canadian women show that those who fit the above profile readily endorse equal opportunity policies. What about policies that advocate preferential treatment? Early studies indicated that women did not endorse these policies. Recent studies, however, revealed a dramatic change in the pattern of responses. Women who were dissatisfied with their collective situation and identified with a nontraditional image of their group predominantly approved of preferential treatment. What factors triggered this change in attitudes? Are the merit principle and preferential treatment policies truly incompatible? We address these questions in the second part of this paper as well as the implications of this shift in attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abella, R. S. (1984).Rapport de la Commission sur l'Egalité en Matière d'Emploi, Vol. 1, Ottawa.
Brown, R. J., and Turner, J.C. (1979). The criss-cross categorization effect in intergroup discrimination.Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 18: 371–383.
Burke, R. J. (1991). Managing an increasingly diverse workforce: Introduction.Can. J. Admin. Sci. 8: 62–63.
Chacko, T. I. (1982). Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects.J. Appl. Psychol. 67: 119–123.
Clayton, S. D., and Tangri, S.S. (1989). The justice of affirmative action. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 177–192.
Colwill, N. L. (1982).The New Partnership: Men and Women in Organizations Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.
Crosby, F. J. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychol. Rev. 83: 85–117.
Crosby, F. J. (1982).Relative Deprivation and Working Women Oxford University Press, New York.
Dovidio, J. F., Mann, J., and Gaertner, S.L. (1989). Resistance to affirmative action: The implications of aversive racism. In Blanchard, F.A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 83–102.
Emploi et Immigration Canada. (1986).Equité en matière d'emploi: Directives aux employeurs, Ottawa.
Kluegel, J. R., and Smith, E. R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs on white's view.Soc. Forces 61: 797–824.
LeBlond, A. (1986).L'action positive dans la fonction publique fédérale et son impact sur l'emploi. Document de travail 86–32, Faculté d'administration, Université d'Ottawa, Canada.
Leonard, J. S. (1984). Antidiscrimination or reverse discrimination: The impact of changing demographics. Title VII, and affirmative action or productivity.J. Hum. Resources 19: 145–174.
Lerner, M. J. (1981).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion Plenum Press, New York.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice Plenum Press, New York.
Lovrich, N. P., Steel, B. S., and Hood, D. (1986). Equity versus productivity: Affirmative action and municipal police services.Public Product. Rev. 39: 61–72.
Martin, J., Brickman, P., and Murray, A. (1983). Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 20: 484–496.
Mighty, R. J. (1991). Valuing workforce diversity: A model of organizational change.Can. J. Admin. Sci. 8: 64–70.
Nacoste, R. W. (1987). But do they care about fairness? The dynamics of preferential treatment and minority influence.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 77–191.
Nacoste, R. W. (1989). Affirmative action and self-evaluation. In Blanchard, F.A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 103–109.
Norvell, N., and Worchel, S. (1981). A reexamination of the relation between equal status contact and integroup attraction.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 902–908.
Runciman, W. G. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England University of California Press, Berkeley.
Runciman, W. G. (1968). Problems of research on relative deprivation. In Hyman, H.H., and Singer, E. (eds.),Reading in Reference Group Theory and Research Free Press, New York, pp. 69–76.
Simpson, G. (1984). The daughters of Charlotte Ray: The career development process during the exploratory and establishment stages of black women attorneys.Sex Roles 11: 113–139.
Simpson, S., McCarrey, M., and Edwards, H.P. (1987). Relationship of supervisors' sex-role stereotypes to performance evaluation of male and female subordinates in non-traditional jobs.Can. J. Admin. Sci. 4: 15–30.
Statistics Canada (1979).Income Distribution by Size in Canada. Household Survey Division, Ottawa.
Statistics Canada, (1988a).Earnings of Men and Women, Table 11, Ottawa.
Statistics Canada (1988b).Labour Force Annual Averages, Table 10, Ottawa.
Steel, B. S., and Lovrich, N.P. (1987). Equality and efficiency tradeoffs on affirmative action—Real or imagined? The case of women in policing.Soc. Sci. J. 24: 53–70.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour.Soc. Sci. Inform. 13: 65–93.
Tajfel, H. (1978).Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations Academic Press, London, pp. 60–76.
Taylor, D. A. (1989). Affirmative action and presidential executive orders. In Blanchard, F. A., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.),Affirmative Action in Perspective Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 21–30.
Taylor, D. M., and Dubé, L. (1986). Two faces of identity: The “I” and the “we.”.J. Soc. Issues 42: 81–98.
Taylor, D. M., and McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 23: 291–300.
Taylor, D. M. and Moghaddam, F. M. (1987).Theories of Intergroup Relations: International Social Psychological Perspectives Praeger, New York.
Tougas, F., Beaton, A. M., and Joly, S. (1990). L"appui des femmes à l'action positive: Une question d'image ou de colère?Sci. Comportement 20: 211–222.
Tougas, F., Beaton, A. M., and Veilleux, F. (1991). Why women approve of affirmative action: The study of a predictive model.Int. J. Psychol. 26: 761–776.
Toughas, F., Dubé, L., and Veilleux, F. (1987). Privation relative et programmes d'action positive.Rev. Can. Sci. Comportement 19: 167–176.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1988). The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 20: 16–29.
Tougas, F., and Veilleux, F. (1991). Les réactions des hommes à l'action positive: Une question d'intérêt personnel ou d'insatisfaction face aux iniquités de sexe?Rev. Can. Sci. Admin. 8: 37–42.
Useem, B. (1980). Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston anti-busing movement.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 357–369.
Veilleux, F. (1989). La participation aux programmes d'action positive dans une perspective de changement social. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Ottawa.
White, J. (1983).Les Femmes dans la Fonction Publique Fédérale: Questions d'Actualité, Conseil Consultatif Canadien de la Situation de la Femme, Ottawa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tougas, F., Beaton, A.M. Women's views on affirmative action: A new look at preferential treatment. Soc Just Res 5, 239–248 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048665
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048665