Skip to main content
Log in

Empathic emotions and justice in society

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empathy is defined as an affect more appropriate to another's situation than to one's own. The paper (i) summarizes different modes of empathic affect arousal; (ii) shows how empathic affect may interact with social-cognitive development, to produce four levels of empathy development; (iii) suggests that causal attributions may transform empathic affect into sympathy, guilt, and empathic anger, which are major moral affects; (iv) discusses how these affects may influence moral judgment and behavior; (v) points up empathic morality's limitations and the need to embed empathy in relevant moral principles; (vi) discusses possible links between empathy and justice principles, with special focus on Rawls; (vii) illustrates the interplay of empathy, moral judgment, and justice; and (viii) suggests that moral principles may become “hot cognitions.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajer, A. J. (1936).Language, Truth, and Logic Gollancz, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, Academic Press, New York, pp. 65–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishops Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy: First draft (1984).Origins 14 (22, 23). Second draft (1985).Origins 15 (17).

  • Damon, W. (1977).The Social World of the Child, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice. A Social Psychological Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, N. D., and Roe, K. (1968). Empathy in six- and seven-year-olds.Child Devel. 39: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C. (1987). Social processes in delinquency: The need to facilitate empathy as well as sociomoral reasoning. In Kurtines, W. M., and Gewirtz, J. C. (eds.),Moral Development Through Social Interaction, Wiley, New York, pp. 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B., and Siebel, C. E. (1975). Affect, aggression, and altruism.Devel. Psychol. 11: 623–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Conscience, personality, and socialization techniques.Hum. Dev. 13: 90–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivationDevel. Psychol. 11: 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1978). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In Keasey, C. B. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 25, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp. 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1980). Moral development in adolescence. In Adelson, J. (ed.),Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 295–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 40: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1982a). Measurement of empathy. In Izard, C. (ed.),Measurement of Emotions in Infants and Children, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1982b). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In Eisenberg, N. (ed.),Development of Prosocial Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 281–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1982c). Affect and moral development. In Cicchetti, D. (ed.),New Directions in Child Development, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization: An information processing approach. In Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D., and Hartup, W. (eds.),Social Cognition and Social Development: A Sociocultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 236–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984a). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In Izard, C., Kagan, J., and Zajonc, R. (eds.),Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984b). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In Gewirtz, J., and Kurtines, W. (eds.),Morality, Moral Development, and Moral Behavior, Wiley, New York, pp. 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1985). Affect, motivation, and cognition. In Higgins, E. T., and Sorrentino, R.M. (eds.),Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Guilford, New York, pp. 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1989). Empathy and prosocial activism. In Eisenberg, N., Reykowski, J., and Staub, E. (eds.),Social and Moral Values, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. pp. 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In Eisenberg, N., and Strayer, J. (eds.),Empathy and its Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L., and Saltzetein, H. D. (1967). Parent discipline and the child's moral development.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 5: 45–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1957).An Inquiry Concerning the Principle of Morals, Vol. 4, Liberal Arts Press, New York. (Original work published 1751)

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977).Human Emotions Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. A. (1988). Women, morality, and social change: A historical perspective. In Eisenberg, N., Reykowski, J., and Staub, E. (eds.),Social and Moral Values, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. J. (1977). The basic dialogue and the capacity for empathy. In N. Freedman and S. Grand (Eds.),Communicative and Psychic Structures Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. (1968).Young Radicals, Hartcourt, Brace, and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, T. (1978). Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence.Psychol. Bull. 85: 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. (1971). Some factors influencing empathy in six- and seven-year-old children varying in ethnic background (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1970).Diss. Abstr. Int., 31: 3960A. (University Microfilms No. 71-3862)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L. (1970). Altruism: An examination of the concept and a review of the literature.Psychol. Bull., 73: 258–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior.J. Soc. Issues, 31, No. 3: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process.Psychol. Bull, 81: 1030–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. (1968).Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1979).Utilitarianism, Hackett, Cambridge, MA. (Original work published 1861)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's privileges; A study on existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. B. (1973).Social Behavior and Child Personality, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1958).The Road to Wigan Pier Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashdall, H. (1907).The Theory of Good and Evil, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical.Philos. Public Affairs 14: 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razran, G. (1971).Mind in Evolution Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1954).The Nature of Sympathy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. (Original work published 1913)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., and Brigham, J. C. (1985). Intergroup contact.J. Soc. Issues, 41(3): 1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigations of empathy. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., and Hoffman, M. L., 1980 Empathy and the arousal of guilt in children.Develop. Psychol. 15: 155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognit. Psychol., 5:207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking.Psychol. Bull., 97: 74–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellbank, J. H., Snook, D., and Mason, D. T. (1982).John Rawls and His Critics: An Annotated Bibliography, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wender, I. (1986). Children's use of justice principles in allocation situations. In Bierhoff, H., Cohen, R., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, R. P. (1977).Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., and King, R. A. (1979). Childrearing and children's prosocial initiations towards victims of distress.Child Devel., 50: 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanna, M. P., Kiesler, C. A., and Pilkonis, P. A. (1970). Positive and negative affect established by classical conditioning.J. Pers. Psychol. 14: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, M.L. Empathic emotions and justice in society. Soc Just Res 3, 283–311 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048080

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048080

Key words

Navigation