Skip to main content
Log in

A rational-voter explanation of the cost of ruling

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that the average government loses votes — the so-called cost of ruling. We show that the loss can be explained as a perfectly rational demand for change in a median voter model, once the model is amended to let the two parties be visibly different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game.Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. (1989). Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies.Economic Policy. April: 57–98.

  • Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1991). A theory of divided government. MIT Working Paper No. 537.

  • Damgaard, E. and Kristensen, O.P. (1982). Party government under pressure. In D. Anckar, E. Damgaard and H. Valen (Eds.),Partier, ideologier, väljare. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D.A. Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy.American Political Science Revice 71: 1467–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1979),Entscheidungen politischer Parteien. München: Verlag Ölschläger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G.H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.American Political Science Review 65: 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J.E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.American Political Science Review 64: 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years.Public Choice, 79 (3–4): 213–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1986). The distribution of election results and the two explanations of the cost of ruling.European Journal of Political Economy 2(1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1990). How robust is the vote function?: A study of seventeen countries over four decades. In H. Norporth, M. Lewis-Beck and J.-D. Lafay (Eds.),Economics and Politics: The calculus of support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1994). Political business cycles. In D.C. Mueller (Ed.),The handbook of public choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1987). Stability of coalition governments in Western Europe: 1945–1986.European Journal of Political Economy 3(4): 555–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1971). Anwendungen der Spieltheorie auf die politische Wissenschaft. In H. Maier, K. Ritter and U. Matz (Eds.),Politik und Wissenschaft. München: Beck. Or B.S. Frey and W.W. Pommerehne (Eds.),Ökonomische Theory der Politik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1990).The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Douglas Hibbs, Manfred Holler, Peter Nannestad, Arthur Schram and the referee for helpful comments. We are also grateful to participants at the Valencia Meeting of the European Public Choice Society for comments, that could easily have doubled the length of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paldam, M., Skott, P. A rational-voter explanation of the cost of ruling. Public Choice 83, 159–172 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047690

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047690

Keywords

Navigation