Skip to main content
Log in

Equity, health, and health care

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equity goals, such as equal treatment for equal need or equality of access, commonly take pride of place among the aims of health policy. But do these conceptions, or others derived from more fundamental philosophical systems such as those of the utilitarians or John Rawls, successfully capture the way in which the term equity is generally used? If not, is it possible to find some interpretation that can command a greater consensus? This paper answers no to the first question and yes to the second. It is argued that the standard conceptions of equity ignore the processes by which health states are determined and hence the extent to which they arise from factors beyond individual control. An alternative conception is proposed that directly incorporates these considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, J. R. (1977). Some comments on fiscal equity and grants to local authorities.Econ. J. 87: 774–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, G. C., and Donaldson, D. (1979). Note on economic equality.J. Public Econ. 12: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality.J. Econ. Theory 2: 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1980).Inequalities in Health. Report of a research working group chaired by Sir Douglas Black. UK Department of Health and Social Security, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality?Philos. Public Affairs 10: 185–247; 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (1972).The Demand for Health, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1975). Fiscal equity and central government grants to local authorities.Econ. J. 85: 531–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1977). Reply.Econ. J. 87: 780–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1982).The Strategy of Equality George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1984). Equity as an economic objective.J. Appl. Philos. 1: 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1986). On researching the distributional consequences of public expenditure. Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper, No. 6, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G., and Maynard, A. K. (1982). (eds.).The Public/Private Mix for Health The National Provincial Hospitals Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G. (1983). Equity in health care: confronting the confusion.Effective Health Care 1.

  • Mooney, G. (1986).Economics, Medicine and Health Care Wheatsheaf, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State and Utopia Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972).A Theory of Justice Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1974). Some reasons for the maximin criterion.Am. Econ. Rev. 64: 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1973).On Economic Inequality Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1974). Equity, envy and efficiency.J. Econ. Theory 9: 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1978). Need—an economic exegesis. In Culyer, A. J., and Wright, K. G. (eds.),Economic Aspects of Health Services Martin Robertson, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Grand, J. Equity, health, and health care. Soc Just Res 1, 257–274 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047663

Key words

Navigation