Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competence to consent to treatment as a psycholegal construct

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The issue of whether civilly committed patients should be extended the right to accept or refuse treatment has generated much controversy and litigation during the past 15 years. In general, the current rule is that in nonemergency situations, individuals who are competent to give informed consent to treatment should be extended the right to refuse it. Obviously, the manner in which this rule is implemented partly depends on how competence to consent to treatment is defined and measured. Most researchers have implicitly assumed that an understanding of treatment information is the sole criterion of competence. It is argued that such a definition may be incomplete and is in need of reexamination. Following a review and analysis of the relevant legal and psychological literature, a comprehensive construct of competency to consent to treatment is proposed and future directions for research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association.Standards for eductional and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: APA, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., & Bateman, A. L. Competency to consent to voluntary psychiatric hospitalization: A theoretical approach.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1979,7, 390–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., and Gutheil, T. G. Rotting with their rights on: Constitutional theory and clinical reality in drug refusal by psychiatric patients.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1979,7, 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., Mirkin, S. A., & Bateman, A. L. Empirical assessment of competency to consent to psychiatric hospitalization.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1981,138,(9), 1170–1176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., & Roth, L. H. Clinical issues in the assessment of competency.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1981,138(11), 1462–1467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arafeh, M. K. The right to refuse treatment: Administrative considerations.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1977,5, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, L., Hurvich, M., & Gediman, H. K.Ego functions in schizophrenics, neurotics and normals. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branca, M. C., D'Angelli, J. F., & Evans, K. L. Development of a decision-making skills education program: study I. Unpublished Manuscript. University Park, Pennsylvania State University, College of Education, Department of Counsellor Education, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. D. The constitutional right to refuse antipsychotic medications.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1980,8(2), 179–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, R. Informed consent: Past, present, and future.Legal Medicine Annual, 1975, 203–214.

  • Burra, P., Kimberley, R., & Miura, C. Mental competence and consent to treatment.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1980,25, 251–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitutional law-Rennie v. Klein: Constitutional right of privacy protects a mental patient's refusal of psychotropic medication.North Carolina Law Review, 1979,57, 1481–1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveaugh-Geiss, J. Informed consent for neuroleptic therapy.American Journal of Psychiatry. 1979,136(7), 959–962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowben, C. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.Houston Law Review, 1979,19, 833–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Zurille, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. Problem-solving and behavior modification.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,78(1), 107–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, P. R. Legel regulation of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons.Arizona Law Review, 1975,17, 39–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan, L. D., & LaRue, L. H. The right of a mental patient to refuse antipsychotic drugs in an institution.Law and Psychology Review, 1978,4, 43–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. D. Public policies underlying the law of mental incompetency.Michigan Law Review, 1940,38, 1189–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T.Juvenile's waiver of rights: Psychological and legal competency. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Vierling, L. Minors' consent to treatment: A developmental perspective.Professional Psychology, 1978,9,(3), 412–427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L., & Summers, F. A study of the capacity of schizophrenic patients to give informed consent.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1980,31(3), 205–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gundy v. Pauley, #80-CA-1737-MR (Ky. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 1981).

  • Gutheil, T. G. In search of true freedom: Drug refusals, involuntary medication and “rotting with your rights on.”American Journal of Psychiatry, 1980,137, 327–328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelhoch, J. M., Davies, R., Tucker, G. J. & Alderman, D. Butting heads: Patients who refuse necessary procedures.Psychiatry in Medicine, 1970,1,(3), 241–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. F. Assessing competence to consent to treatment.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1980,25(4), 354–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P. B. The right to refuse psychiatric treatment: A clinical perspective.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1976,4, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • In re President & Directors of Georgetown College, Inc., 381 F. 2d 1000 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 978 (1964).

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L.Decision-making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz v. Dept. of Mental Health, Civ. No. 73-19434-AW (Cir. Ct. Wayne Cty., July 10, 1973),reported in A. Brooks,Law, Psychiatry, and the Mental Health System, Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1974.

  • Knecht v. Gillman, 448 F. 2d 1136 (8th Cir., 1973).

  • Meisel, A. The “exceptions” to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decision-making.Wisconsin Law Review, 1979,2, 413–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, A., & Roth, L. H. What we know and do not know about informed consent.Journal of the American Medical Association, 1981,246(21), 2473–2477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, A., Roth, L. H., & Lidz, C. W. Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977,134(3), 285–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mental disability and the right to vote.Yale Law Journal, 1979,88, 1644–1664.

  • Mezer, R. R., & Rheingold, P. D. Mental capacity and incompetency: A psycho-legal problem.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1962,118, 827–831.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. G. Total institutions and the possibility of consent to organic therapies.Human Rights, 1975,5, 25–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. G. Therapy and the problem of autonomous consent.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 1979,2, 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.Y.C. Health & Hosp. Corp. v. Stein, 70 Misc. 2d 944, 355 N.Y.S. 2d 908, 1972.

  • Opler, L. A., Katz, I., Kobayashi, J., & Ruiz, P. Tardive dyskinesia and institutional practice: current issues and guidelines.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1980,31(4). 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perr, I. N. The many faces of competency. In W. E. Barton & C. V. Sanborn (eds).Law & the mental health professions: Friction at the interface, New York: Universities Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, R. Limiting the therapeutic orgy: mental patients' right to refuse treatment.Northwestern University School of Law, 1977,72, (4), 461–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, R., & Gill, K. R. Invisible manacles: Drugging mentally retarded people.Stanford Law Review, 1979,31, 637–678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryce, I. G. Clinical research upon mentally ill subjects who cannot give informed consent.British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978,133, 366–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation of electroconvulsive therapy.Michigan Law Review, 1976,75, 363–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relf v. Weinberger, 372 F. Suppl. 1196 (D.C. 1974).

  • Rennie v. Klein, 462 F. Supp. 1131 (D.N.J. 1978), modified 476 F. Supp. 1294 (D.N.J. 1979), stay denied, 481 F. Supp. 552 (D.N.J. 1979), modified and remanded, 653 F. 2nd. 836 (3rd. Cir. 1981), en banc, vacated and remanded, 50 U.S.L.W. 3998.27 (July 2, 1982).

  • Rhoden, N. K. The right to refuse psychotropic drugs.Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 1980,15, 363–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers v. Okin, 478 F. Suppl. 1342 (D. Mass. 1979), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 643 F. 2nd 650 (1st Cir. 1980), vacated and remanded, 50 U.S.L.W. 4676 (June 18, 1982).

  • Rosoff, A. J.Informed consent: A guide for health care providers. Rockville: Aspen Systems, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. H. A commitment law for patients, doctors, and lawyers.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1979,136(9), 1121–1122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Meisel, A., Soloff, P. H., Kaufman, K., Spiker, D. G., & Foster, F. G. Competency to decide about treatment or research.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1982,5, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. H., Meisel, A., & Lidz, C. W. Tests of competency to consent to treatment.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977,134(3), 279–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, C. ECT and ethical psychiatry.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977,134(9), 1006–1019.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., all N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).

  • Schwartz, B. M. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.Notre Dame Lawyer, 1975,50, 808–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. A. Legal and mental health system interactions: Major developments and research needs.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1981,4, 219–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. C., & Abuzzahab, F. S. Informed consent: Legal requirements in psychiatric practice.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1979,7, 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwed, H. J. Protecting the rights of the mentally ill.American Bar Association Journal, 1978,64, 564–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovenko, R. On the legal aspects of tardive dyskinesia.Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1979,7, 295–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, T. Informed consent for mental patients?Human Rights, 1979,8,(1), 31–33; 52–53; 55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soskis, D. A. Schizophrenics and medical inpatients as informed durg consumers.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978,35(5), 645–647.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sovner, R., Dimascio, A., Berkowitz, D., & Randolph, P. Tardive dyskinesia and informed consent.Psychosomatics, 1978,19(3), 172–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, G., Platt, J. J., & Shure, M. B.The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B., Stanley, M., Lautin, A., Kane, J., & Schwartz, N. Preliminary findings on psychiatric patients as research participants: A population at risk?American Journal of Psychiatry, 1981,138(5), 669–671.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starkman, M. N., & Youngs, D. D. Psychiatric consultation with patients who refuse medical care.International Journal of Psychiatry In Medicine, 1974,5(2), 115–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Informed Consent: Special problems of psychiatry.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1979,30(5), 321–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A.Mental health & the law: A system in transition. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tancredi, L. R. The rights of mental patients: Weighing the interests.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1980,5(2), 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, A. M. Informed decision-making capacity as it relates to incompetency and the right to refuse treatment. Unpublished Masters thesis, Hahnemann University, 1979.

  • Tepper, A. M., & Kaslow, F. W. Informed decision-making capacity: a patient's ability to participate in treatment determinations.Law and Psychology Review, 1981,6, 49–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weithorn, L. A., & Campbell, S. B. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions.Child Development, 1982,53, 1589–1598.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D. B. Reflections on the legal regulation of behavior modification in institutional settings.Arizona Law Review, 1975,17, 132–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D. B.Mental health law. New York: Plenum Press. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters v. Miller, 446 F. 2d 65 (2nd Cir. 1971),cert. denied, 404 U.S. 985 (1971).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 121 North Broad Street, 19107, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Allan M. Tepper (Defender Association of Philadelphia)

  2. Law-Psychology Graduate Program, Hahnemann University, 230 North Broad Street, MS 403, 19102, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Amiram Elwork

Authors
  1. Allan M. Tepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amiram Elwork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Tepper, A.M., Elwork, A. Competence to consent to treatment as a psycholegal construct. Law Hum Behav 8, 205–223 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044693

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044693

Keywords

Search

Navigation