Abstract
This study was designed to clarify the types of information about juveniles and their families that are relevant for three types of juvenile court decisions: (a) the pretrial detention of juveniles; (b) their transfer for trial in criminal courts: and (c) disposition decisions after delinquency adjudication. Predominant legal standards for these decisions are described, information relevance for the decisions is defined, and why past studies have failed to clarify the information needs of juvenile court decision makers is explained. Results of a study involving a national sample of juvenile court personnel include an empirically derived domain of psychosocial and behavioral characteristics of juveniles and their families relevant for courts' interpretations of controlling legal standards; factor analysis of the domain, describing dimensions of the domain of information about juveniles and families; and an examination of the relation of these information categories to each legal standard controlling the decision areas in question. The interpretation of results may facilitate decision making by juvenile courts, evaluations by mental health professionals who assist juvenile courts, and further research by social scientists who study discretionary juvenile court decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addams, J. (Ed.) (1925).The child, the clinic and the court. New York: New Republic.
Arnold, W. (1971). Race and ethnicity relative to other factors in juvenile court dispositions.American Journal of Sociology, 77, 211–227.
Bailey, W., & peterson, R. (1981). Legal versus extra-legal determinants of juvenile court dispositions.Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 32, 41–59.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. (1963).Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Blomberg, T. (1977). The juvenile court as an organization and decision-making system.International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1, 135–145
Bortner, M. (1982).Inside a juvenile court: The tarnished ideal of individualized justice. New York: New York University Press.
Brunswik, E. (1952).The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Carter, T. (1979). Juvenile court dispositions: A comparison of status and nonstatus offenders.Criminology, 17, 341–359.
Cicourel, A. (1968).The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley.
Cohen, L. (1975a).Delinquency dispositions: An empirical analysis of processing decisions in three juvenile courts. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Cohen, L. (1975b).Pre-adjudicatory detention in three juvenile courts: An empirical analysis of the factors related to detention decision outcomes. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Cohen, L., & Kluegel, J. (1978). Determinants of juvenile court dispositions: Ascriptive and achieved factors in two metropolitan courts.American Sociological Review, 43, 162–176.
Dungworth, T. (1977). Discretion in the juvenile justice system: The impact of case characteristics in prehearing detention. In J. Ferdinand (Ed.),Juvenile delinquency (pp. 19–43) Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Eigen, J. (1981). Punishing youth homicide offenders in Philadelphia.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 1072–1093.
Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. (1982).Explaining delinquency and drug use: The National Youth Survey project report No. 21 Boulder, Colorado: Behavioral Research Institut.
Elliott, D., & Voss, H. (1980).Delinquency and dropout Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath.
Empey, L. (Ed.) (1979).Juvenile justice: The progressive legacy and current reforms Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia.
Erikson, E. (1963).Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Federal Judicial Center (1981).Experimentation in the law: Report of the Federal Judicial Center Advisory Committee on experimentation in the law Washington, DC: Author.
Ferster, E., & Courtless, T. (1972). Pre-dispositional data, role of counsel and decisions in a juvenile court.Law and Society Review, 7, 195–222.
Flicker, B. (1979). Discretionary law for juveniles. In L. Abt & I. Stuart (Eds.),Social psychology and discretionary law (pp. 289–315) New York Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Fox, S. (1970). Juvenile justice reform: An historical perspective.Stanford Law Review, 22, 1187–1239.
Gordley, J. (1984). Legal reasoning: An introduction.California Law Review, 72, 138–177.
Gottfredson, M., & Gottfredson, D. (1980).Decisionmaking in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
Grisso, T. (1981)Juvniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence New York: Plenum.
Grisso, T., & Conlin, M. (1984). Procedural issues in the juvenile justice system. In N. Reppucci L. Weithorn, E. Mulvey, & J. Monahan (Ed.),Children mental health, and the law (pp. 171–193). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Guion, R. (1978). Scoring of content domain samples: The problem of fairness.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 499–506.
Hamparian, D., Estep, L., Muntean, S., Priestino, R., Swisher, R., Wallace, P., & White, J. (1981).Youth in adult courts: Between two worlds. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
Hays, J. & Solway, K. (1979). Psychological characteristics of juveniles against whom waiver of juvenile jurisdiction is considered.Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 55–62.
Healy, W. (1915).The individual delinquent Boston: Little, Brown.
Healy, W. (1917).mental conflicts and misconduct. Boston: Little, Brown.
Horowitz, A., & Wasserman, M. (1980). Formal rationality, substantive justice, and discrimination: A study of a juvenile court.Law and Human Behavior, 4, 103–105.
Ito, J., & Stapleton, V. (1981), April).The role of court type in juvenile court dispositional outcome. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern sociological Society, Louisville, Kentucky.
Jessor, R., Graves, T., Hanson, R., & Jessor, S. (1968).Society, personality, and deviant behavior: A study of a tri-ethnic community. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977).Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.
Keiter, R. (1973). Criminal or delinquent? A study of juvenile cases transferred to the criminal court.Crime and Delinquency, 19, 528–538.
Kelly, G. (1955).The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Kelly, G. (1963).A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Lamiell, J. (1979). Disretion in juvenile justice: A framework for systematic study.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 76–101.
Lovinguth, T. (1981). Discriminatory variables in certification of juvenile offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation St. Louis University, St. Louis.
Mack, J. (1909). The juvenile court.Harvard Law Review, 23, 104–122.
Mennel, R. (1973).Thorns and thistles: Juvenile delinquents in the United States, 1825–1940 Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press of New England.
Messick, S. (1975). The standards problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation.American Psychologist, 30, 955–966.
Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment.American Psychologist, 35, 1012–1027.
Monahan, J. (1981).The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Rockville, Maryland: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Moos, R., & Moos, R. (1981).Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Morse, S., & Whitebread, C. (1982). Mental health implications of the juvenile justice system. In G. Melton (Ed.).Legal reforms affecting child and youth services (pp. 5–27). New York: Haworth.
Mulvey, E. (1983).Resource availability, agency type, and amenability to treatment judgements of juvenile offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Mulvey, E. (1984). Judging amenability to treatment in juvenile offenders. In N. Reppucci, L. Weithorn, E. Mulvey, & J. Monahan (Ed.),Children, mental health, and the law (pp. 195–210. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
National Center for State Courts (1980).Directory of metropolitan juvenile courts. Williamsburg, Virginia: Author.
Nie, N., Hull, C., Jenkins, J., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. (1975).Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pennsylvania Governor's Justice Commission (1978).Transfer of juveniles to adult court in Pennsylvania, 1974–1977 Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
Phillips, C., & Dinitz, S. (1982). Labelling and juvenile court dispositions: Official responses to a cohort of violent juveniles.Sociological Quarterly, 23, 267–278.
Platt, A. (1977).The child savers: The invention of delinquency (2nd ed.) Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Quay, H. (1965).Personality and delinquency. In H. Quay (Ed).Juvenile delinquency. New York: Litton.
Rotter, J. (1954).Social learning and clinical psychology Englewood Cliffs, New Jersery: Prentice-Hall.
Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographys, 80, Whole No. 609.
Ryerson, E. (1978).The best laid plans: America's juvenile court experiment New York:Hill and Wang.
Sarri, R. (1974).Under lock and key: Juveniles in jails and detention. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Scarpitti, R., & Stephenson, R. (1971). Juvenile court dispositions: Factors in the decision-making process.Crime and Delinquency, 17, 142–151.
Schlossman, S. (1977).Love and the American delinquent: The theory and practice of “progressive” juvenile justice, 1825–1920. Chicago Illinnis: University of Chicago Press.
Seeman, M. (1975). Alienation studies. In A. Inkeles, J. Coleman, & N. Smelser (Eds.),Annual review of sociology, Volume 1 (pp. 91–123). Palo Alto, California:Annual Reviews.
Shah, S. (1977). Dangerousness: Some definitional, conceptual, and public policy issues. In B. Sales (Eds.)The criminal justice system (pp. 91–119). New York: Plenum.
Stapleton, V., Aday, D., & Ito, J. (1982). An empirical typology of American metropolitan juvenile courts.American Journal of Sociology, 88, 549–564.
Sumner, H. (1971). Locking them up.Crime and Delinquency, 17, 168–179.
Tenopyr, M. (1977). Content—construct confusion.Personnel Psychology, 30, 47–54.
Terry, R. (1967). Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by social control agencies.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4, 218–230.
Thomas, C. & Cage, R. (1977). The effect of social characteristics on juvenile court dispositions.Sociological Quarterly, 18, 237–252.
Thornberry, T. (1973). Race, socioeconomic status and sentencing in the juvenile justice system.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 90–98.
Thornberry, T. (1979). Sentencing disparities in the juvenile justice system.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 164–171.
Tomkins, A. (1984). A study of postadjudication disposition decisions using the framework of social judgment theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University St. Louis.
Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T., (1972).Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grant No. MH-35090 from the Center for Studies of Antisocial and Violent Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health, DHHS. Portions of the study were conducted in collaboration with the National Juvenile Law Center, Inc. of St. Louis. The authors wish to acknowledge Martha Bellew-Smith, Marcia Conlin, and Robert Rust, who contributed substantially to the conduct of the study. Others who participated at various stages are Steve Bellus and Sandra Seigel
About this article
Cite this article
Grisso, T., Tomkins, A. & Casey, P. Psychosocial concepts in juvenile law. Law Hum Behav 12, 403–437 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044626
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044626