Abstract
The ethical problems surrounding expert testimony depend directly on the historically specific relationship between science and scientists, on the one hand, and society on the other. In the seventeenth century, when modern experimental science was beginning to emerge, it drew upon legal experience to bolster its methodological arguments. In the eighteenth century, after the successes of Sir Isaac Newton, science gained in authority, and even in law courts the epistemological authority of science went unchallenged. In the nineteenth century, the more empirical sciences, such as chemistry and physics, entered the courts, and juries found the testimony of experimental chemists and physicists useful for their decisions. In the twentieth century, experimental psychology entered the courts. Pushed by Hugo Munsterburg, who saw in legal recognition a way of advancing psychology as a scientific profession, experimental psychology in the courtroom raised ethical problems at the beginning of the century that are still matters of controversy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, F. L. (1931).Only yesterday, New York: Harper and Row.
Boyle, R. (1732). In T. Birch (Ed.),Works. London: J. Rivington.
Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony.Scientific American, December.
cassirer, E. (1951).The philosophy of the enlightenment Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, I. B. (1951). Prejudice against lightning rods.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 253 (99), 437.
Fullmer, J. (1980). Technology, chemistry and the law in early 19th century England.Technology and Culture, 21, 1–28.
Gunther, R. (1930).Early science in Oxford (Vol. VI), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hale, M. (1980).Human science and social order. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hesse, M. (1966). Hooke's philosophical algebra.Isis, 57, 67–83.
Hooke, R. (1705). In R. Waller (Ed.),Posthumous works. London: S. Smith.
Jastrow, J. (1908).The Dial, 45, 38.
Kargon, R. (1977).Science in Victorian Manchester. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.The Nation, 1908,86, 472.
Münsterberg, H. (1908).On the witness stand. New York: McClure.
Newton, I. (1958).Papers and letters on natural philosophy. I. Bernard Cohen (Ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Vellay, C. (1909). Robespierre et le proces du paratonnerre (1780–1784).Annales revolutionnaires, 2, 25–38, 207–225.
Voltaire, F. M. (1961).Philosophical letters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Wiebe, R. (1957).The search for order. New York: Hill and Wang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kargon, R. Expert testimony in historical perspective. Law Hum Behav 10, 15–27 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044555