Summary
Two complex models to determine photolysis frequencies for chemical transport models are used to study the effects of input data and the consideration of relevant physical processes on the derived photolysis frequencies. Within the model CTM photolysis frequencies are calculated on a coarse latitudinal grid with climatological input data (monthly mean or seasonal mean values) and are then interpolated linearly in space to derive photolysis frequencies for each grid cell of the chemical transport model. These clear sky photolysis frequencies are then corrected to account for cloud effects. The model STAR calculates photolysis frequencies for each grid cell considering the relevant physical processes on the basis of actual profiles computed with a mesoscale meteorological model and other available geophysical data.
The comparison of the O3 and NO2 photolysis frequencies shows that the approach used within the CTM model compares to STAR only under certain conditions, as climatological input data can be less suitable for episodic photolysis frequencies calculations. The ozone column content significantly alters the photolysis frequency of ozone itself and climatological Dobson data limit the quality of the calculations. The temperature dependence of the quantum yields and the absorption cross sections lead to increased uncertainties when climatological temperature profiles are used. This is especially the case for sunrise/sunset conditions. The use of one surface albedo for all landuse types and seasons within the CTM model restricts the quality of the calculations close to the surface. If clouds are present the CTM model over-/underestimates the cloud effects on the photolysis frequencies and differences up to an order of magnitude are found for below cloud values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthes, R. A., Hsie, E. Y., Kuo, Y.-H., 1987: Description of the Pennstate/NCAR Mesoscale Model Version 4 (MM4). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-282+STR., 66 pp.
Brost, R. A., 1988. The sensitivity to input parameters of atmospheric concentrations simulated by a regional chemical model.J. Geophys. Res.,93 (D3), 2371–2387.
Chang, J. S., Brost, R. A., Isaksen, I. S. A., Madronich, S., Middleton, P., Stockwell, W. R., Walcek, C. J., 1987: A three dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation.J. Geophys. Res.,92, 14681–14700.
Demerjian, K. L., Schere, K. L., Peterson, J. T., 1980: Theoretical estimates of actinic (spherically integrated) flux and photolytic rate constants of atmospheric species in the lower troposphere.Adv. Environ. Sci. Technol.,10, 369–459.
Hass, H., 1991: Description of the EURAD chemistry transport module (CTM) version 2. Report 83. In: Ebel, A., Neubauer, F. M., Speth, P. (eds.) Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, 100pp.
Hass, H., Ebel, A., Feldmann, H., Jakobs, H. J., Memmesheimer, M., 1993. Evaluation studies with a regional chemical transport model (EURAD) using air quality data from the EMEP monitoring network.Atmos. Environ.,27A, 867–887.
Hass, H., Jakobs, H. J., Memmesheimer, M., 1995: Analysis of a regional model (EURAD) near surface gas concentration prediction using observations from metworks.Meteorol. Atmos. Phys.,57, 173–200.
Joseph, J. H., Wiscombe, W. J., Weinman, J. A., 1976: The delta-Eddington approximation for radiative flux transfer.J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2452–2458.
Junkermann, W., 1994: Measurements of theJ(O1 D) actinic flux within and above stratiform clouds and above snow surfaces. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European Symposium on ‘Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants’ Varese 18–22 October 1993. Report EUR 15609/1 EN, Vol 1, European Commission printing office, Luxembourg, 1017–1022.
Madronich, S., 1987: Photodissociation in the atmosphere, 1, Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds.J. Geophys. Res.,92, (D8), 9740–9752.
Memmesheimer, M., Tippke, J., Ebel, A., Hass, H., Jakobs, H. J., Laube, M., 1991: On the use of EMEP emission inventories for European scale air pollution modelling with the EURAD model. In: Pankrath, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the EMEP workshop on photooxidant modelling for long-range transport in relation to abatement strategies. UBA, Berlin, Germany, 307–324.
McClatchey, R. A., Fenn, R. W., Selby, J. E. A., Volz, F. E., Garing, J. S., 1972: Optical properties of the atmosphere. AFCRL-720497,Environ. Res. Pap., p. 411.
Nakajima, T., Tanaka, M., 1986: Matrix formulations for the transfer of solar radiation in a plane-parallel scattering atmosphere.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer,35, 13–21.
Nakajima, T., Tanaka, M., 1988: Algorithms for radiative intensity calculations in moderately thick atmospheres using a truncation approximation.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer,40, 51–69.
Ruggaber, A., Forkel, R., Dlugi, R., 1993: Spectral actinic flux and its ratio to spectral irradiance by radiation transfer calculations.J. Geophys. Res.,98, 1151–1162.
Ruggaber, A., Dlugi, R., Nakajima, T., 1994. Modelling of radiation quantities and photolysis frequencies in the troposphere.J. Atmos. Chem.,18, 171–210.
Simpson, D., 1992: Long-period modelling of photochemical oxidants in Europe. Model calculations for July 1985.Atmos. Environ.,26A, 1609–1634.
Stockwell, W. R., Middleton, P., Chang, J. S., Tang, X., 1990: The second generation regional acid deposition model: Chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling.J. Geophys. Res.,95, 16343–16367.
Tampieri, F., Tomasi, C., 1976: Size distribution models of fog and cloud droplets in terms of modified gamma function.Tellus. 28, 333–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 11 Figures
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hass, H., Ruggaber, A. Comparison of two algorithms for calculating photolysis frequencies including the effects of clouds. Meteorl. Atmos. Phys. 57, 87–100 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044155
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044155