Skip to main content
Log in

Smoke management for covered malls and atria

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the principal design considerations of smoke management systems for covered malls and atria included in a recently proposed technical guide. The engineering basis for formulating an appropriate design for a smoke management system is presented in the form of algebraic equations and graphs. Techniques to assess the level of life hazard created by a fire in an atrium or covered mall with a smoke management system are discussed. The level of life hazard is expressed in terms of the following hazard parameters: smoke layer depth; visibility through the smoke layer; and the carbon monoxide concentration and temperature rise in the smoke layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

cross-sectional area of atrium (ft2)

c p :

specific heat of smoke (Btu/lb °F)

C CO :

volumetric concentration of carbon monoxide

d :

diameter of plume (ft)

D :

depth of smoke layer (ft)

D l :

optical density of smoke per unit pathlength (ft-1)

D mass :

mass optical density (ft2 /lb)

H :

ceiling height (ft)

H c, conv :

convective heat of combustion (Btu/lb)

m :

mass flow rate (lb/s)

m f :

mass burning rate (lb/s)

M air :

molecular weight of air (lb)

M CO :

molecular weight of carbon monoxide (lb)

Q :

heat release rate from fire (Btu/s)

Q c :

convective heat release rate from fire (Btu/s)

t :

time (s)

T :

temperature at plume centerline (°R)

ΔT :

temperature rise

T′ :

temperature change of ambient air per unit height (°R/ft)

ΔT ad :

adiabatic temperature rise (°F)

T o :

ambient air temperature (°R)

T 1 :

increase in temperature of the ambient air from the ceiling to the floor (°F)

v :

visibility distance (ft)

V :

volumetric flow rate (cfm)

X :

empirical correlation factor

y :

height above fuel surface (ft)

Y :

empirical correlation factor

Y CO :

yield of carbon monoxide produced per unit mass of combustible consumed (lbCO/lbfuel)

z :

clear height or height from top of fuel surface to bottom of smoke layer (ft)

z f :

flame height above fuel surface (ft)

ρ :

density of smoke (lb/ft3)

1:

conditions at an exhaust rate

2:

conditions at a second exhaust rate.

References

  1. Bastings, D.,Fire Safety in Atrium Buildings, BRANZ Study Report SR15, Building Research Association of New Zealand, Judgeford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beyler, C., “Fire Plumes and Ceiling Jets,”Fire Safety J. 11, 1986, pp. 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryan, J.L., “Damageability of Buildings, Contents and Personnel from Exposure to Fire,”Fire Safety J.,11, 1986, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagglund, B., Jannson, R., and Nireus, K., “Smoke Filling Experiments in a 6 × 6 × 6 Meter Enclosure,” FOA Report C20585-06, Forsavrets Forskningsanstalt, Sweden, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansell, G.O., “Smoke Control in Atrium Buildings,”Building Standards, July/August 1988, pp. 15–23, 35–37.

  6. Heskestad, G., “Engineering Relations for Fire Plumes,” SFPE TR 82-8, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heskestad, G., private communication, 1989.

  8. Heskestad, G., and Delichatsios, M.A., “Environments of Fire Detectors—Phase 1: Effect of Fire Size, Ceiling Height and Material,” Volume I—“Measurements” (NBS-GCR-77-86), Volume II—“Analysis” (NBS-GCR-77-95), National Bureau of Standards, 1977.

  9. Hinkley, P.L., “Smoke and Heat Venting,”SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, P.J. DiNenno, ed., NFPA, Quincy, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin, T., Visibility through Fire Smoke (part 2), Report of the Fire Research Institute of Japan, Nos. 33, 31, 1971.

  11. Milke, J.A., “Fire Hazard Assessment in Atriums,” presented at The Roundtable on Fire Safety In Atriums—Are the Codes Meeting the Challenge?, Washington, D.C., December 15, 1988 (to be published).

  12. Morgan, H.P., and Hansell, G.O., “Fire Sizes and Sprinkler Effectiveness in Offices: Implications for Smoke Control Design,”Fire Safety J. 8, 1984/1985, pp. 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan, H.P., and Hansell, G.O., “Atrium Buildings: Calculating Smoke Flows in Atria for Smoke-Control Design,”Fire Safety J. 12, 1987, pp. 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan, H.P., and Marshall, N.R., “Smoke Control Methods in Enclosed Shopping Centres of One or More Stories: A Design Summary,” British Research Establishment, Borehamwood, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morton, B.R., Taylor, Sir Geoffrey, and Turner, J.S., “Turbulent Gravitational Convection from Maintained and Instantaneous Sources,”Proc. Royal Society,A234, pp. 1–23, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mullholland, G., Handa, T., Sugawa, O., and Yamamoto, H., “Smoke Filling in an Enclosure,” Paper 81-HT-8, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1981.

  17. NFPA 72E, “Standard on Automatic Fire Detectors,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NFPA 92A, “Recommended Practice for Smoke Control Systems,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. NFPA 92B, “1990 NFPA Technical Committee Reports—Technical Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria and Large Areas,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. NFPA101, Life Safety Code, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NFPA101, “1990 NFPA Technical Committee Reports—Life Safety Code,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. NFPA 204M, “Guide for Smoke and Heat Venting,” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nowler, S.P., “Enclosure Experiment Characterization Testing for the Base Line Validation of Computer Fire Simulation Codes,” NUREG/CR-4681, SAND 86-1296, Sandia National Laboratories, March 1987.

  24. Parnell, A., “Architectural Implications in Providing Effective Smoke Control Systems,”Fire,78, February 1986, pp. 28–29, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tewarson, A., “Physico-Chemical and Combustion Pyrolysis Properties of Polymeric Materials,” NBS-GCR-80-295, National Bureau of Standards, November, 1980.

  26. Tewarson, A. “Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fires,”SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering P.J. DiNenno, ed., NFPA, Quincy, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waters, R.A., “Stansted Terminal Building and Early Atrium Studies,”J. of Fire Protection Engineering,1, April–May–June 1989, pp. 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milke, J.A. Smoke management for covered malls and atria. Fire Technol 26, 223–243 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040110

Key words

Navigation