Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical method to evaluate homogeneity of structural populations

  • Published:
Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For any specific rock unit in a discontinuous rock mass, the determination of structural domain boundaries is important because geologic and hydrologic properties vary from one domain to another. A domain can be considered as a structural population characterized by a distinct pattern of structure orientations (i.e., fracture, bedding, or foliation orientations).Boundaries are usually determined by comparing samples of structural data, each of which consists of a Schmidt plot that commonly displays at least 150 poles to fractures. When fracture orientations appear dispersed and random on the plots, visual comparisons are not sufficient to determine whether the samples were obtained from the same structural domain. An appropriate x 2 test has been adapted to this situation and is capable of evaluating the homogeneity of structural populations. The method uses a contingency table analysis based on the frequencies of fracture poles that occur in corresponding patches on the Schmidt plots being compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (Eds.), 1965, Handbook of mathematical functions: Dover Publ., New York, 1046 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. J. and Lee, Y., 1975, Alternative analysis of geographical contingency tables: The Professional Geographer, v. 27, p. 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, R. D., Savely, J. P., and Nicholas, D. E., 1976, Estimation of joint set characteristics from surface mapping data: in Proceedings of the 17th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics, Salt Lake City, Utah, p. 2B2.1–2B2.9.

  • Chapman, D. G. and Schaufele, R. A., 1970, Elementary probability models and statistical inference: Ginn-Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass., p. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G., 1954, Some methods for strengthening the commonx 2 tests: Biometrics, v. 10, p. 417–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S., 1939, The mean and variance ofx 2, when used as a test of homogeneity, when expectations are small: Biometrika, v. 31, p. 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, H. O., 1969, The chi-squared distribution: John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, R. D., 1965, Sources of error in joint surveys: Geotechnique, v. 15, no. 3, p. 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, S.M. A statistical method to evaluate homogeneity of structural populations. Mathematical Geology 15, 317–328 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036073

Key words

Navigation