Abstract
Data for individual markets suggest that the Herfindahl- Hirschman Index does not fully account for the inequality of market shares and the number of firms in a market. An empirical investigation is conducted to determine whether share inequality, number of firms, and major firm presence affect market profit rates independent of the HHI. The analysis controls for efficiency, among other things. Test results based on 1,684 banking markets during 1990–1992 indicate that the HHI, market share inequality, and the importance of major firms are positively related and the number of firms is negatively related to profit rates. Results on several other variables also suggest that market imperfections exist in local banking markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, M. A. (1959) ‘Differential Rates and Changes in Concentration’,Review of Economics and Statistics 41, 68–69.
Adelman, M. A. (1969) ‘Comment on the “H” Concentration Measure as A Numbers-Equivalent’,Review of Economics and Statistics 41, 99–101.
Amel, D. (1993) ‘State Laws Affecting the Geographic Expansion of Commercial Banks’, Working paper, Federal Reserve Board.
Amel, D and N. Liang (1992) ‘A Dynamic Model of Entry and Performance in the U.S. Banking Industry’, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 210, Federal Reserve Board.
Berger, A. N. and D.B. Humphrey (1991) ‘The Dominance of Inefficiencies over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking’,Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117–148.
Berger, A. N. and T. H. Hannan (1994) ‘The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry: A Test of the “Quiet Life” and Related Hypotheses’, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board.
Department of Justice (1992)Horizontal Merger Guidelines.
Edwards, C. (1955) ‘Conglomerate Bigness As A Source of Power’, NBER,Business Concentration and Price Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 331–359.
Encaoua, D. P. Geroski, and A. Jacquemin (1986) ‘Strategic Competition and the Persistence of Dominant Firms: A Survey’, in J. E. Stiglitz and G. F. Mathewson, (eds)New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure, 55–86, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Federal Reserve Bulletin (1993) Order approving acquisition by First Bank System79, 534–540.
Grossack, I. M. (1965) ‘Toward an Integration of Static and Dynamic Measures of Industry Concentration’,Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 301–308.
Humphrey, D. B. (1990) ‘Why Do Estimates of Scale Economies Differ?’,Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 38–50.
Landes, W. M. and R. A. Posner (1981) ‘Market Power in Antitrust Cases’,Harvard Law Review 94, 937–996.
Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1982) ‘Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence’,Journal of Economic Theory 27, 280–312.
Ordover, J. A., and G. Saloner (1989) ‘Predation, Monopolization, and Antitrust’, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds.),Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. New York: North-Holland.
Rhoades, S. A. (1985) ‘Market Performance and the Nature of A Competitive Fringe’,Journal of Economics and Business 37, 141–157.
Rhoades, S. A. (1994) ‘A Summary of Merger-Performance Studies in Banking: 1980–1993, and an Assessment of the “Event Study” and “Operating Performance” Methodologies’,Staff Study 167, Federal Reserve Board.
Scherer, F. M. (1970)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.
Scherer, F. M. (1980)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Rand McNally and Co.
Scherer, F. M., and D. Ross (1990)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Shepherd, W. G. (1986) ‘On the Core Concepts of Industrial Economics’, in H. W. deJong and W. G. Shepherd, (eds.)Mainstreams in Industrial Organization — Book I, 23–67. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Waterson, M. (1984)Economic Theory of the Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, L. W. (1989)Concentration and Price. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, A. P. (1982) ‘A Note on Market Structure Measures and the Characteristics of the Markets That They “Measure”’,Southern Economic Journal, 542–549.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhoades, S.A. Market share inequality, the HHI, and other measures of the firm-composition of a market. Rev Ind Organ 10, 657–674 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024300