Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex differences in the endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies were surveyed among 337 employees (176 males and 161 females). The sample was composed of managers, business owners, and professional, technical, sales, and office support workers from a variety of organizations. No significant differences were found between males and females with respect to scores on the Political Orientation Questionnaire, preference for teamwork, exchange of favors, and upward appeal. However, women were significantly less likely than men to perceive themselves as relying on charm, manipulative tactics, and personal appearance to achieve results and gain advantage. None of the sex differences could be attributed to years of job experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayers-Nachamkin, B., Cann, C. H., Reed, R., and Horne, A. Sex and ethnic differences in the use of power. (1982).Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 464–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benderly, B. L. (1987).The myth of two minds: What gender means and doesn't mean. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biberman, G. (1985). Personality and characteristic work attitudes of persons with high, moderate, and low political tendencies.Psychological Reports, 57, 1303–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briles, Judith. (1988).Women to women: From sabotage to support. New York: New Horizon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F., & Janda, L. H. (1984). The eye of the beholder.Psychology Today, 18, December, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., and Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of organizational politics.Academy of Management Review, 6, 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Owen, C. L. (1987). Sex effects in workplace justice outcomes: A field assessment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrin, A. J. (1981). Winning at office politics.Success, September33, 26–28, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrin, A. J. (1988). Career maturity, organizational rank, and political behavior tendencies: a correlational analysis of organizational politics and career experience.Psychological Reports, 63, 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1983). Sex differences during occupational socialization.Academy of Management Journal, 26, 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grams, R., & Schwab, D. P. (1985). An investigation of systematic gender-related error in job evaluation.Academy of Management Journal, 28, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., and Aris, S. S. (1985). Politics and strategic change across organization life cycles.Academy of Management Review, 10, 707–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harragan, B. L. (1977).Games mother neuer taught you. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jago, A. G., & Vroom, V. H. (1982). Sex differences in the incidence and evaluation of participative leadership behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D., & Mitz, L. F. (1985). Sex differences in work stress.Academy of Management Review, 10, 408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. M.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one's way.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Philips, J. S., & Rush, M. C. (1980). Effects of sex and personality on perceptions of emergent leadership, influence, and social power.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Konar, E. (1984). Sex differences in pay expectations and their possible causes.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 777–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, L., & Thornton, G. C., III. (1986). Effects of gender on self-and supervisory ratings.Academy of Management Journal, 1986,29, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., White, R. P., Van Velsor, E., & The Center for Creative Leadership. (1987).Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1987). The effects of sex and gender on recruitment.Academy of Management Review, 12, 731–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., & Lappin, M. (1980). Race and sex as determinants of the mean and variance of performance ratings.Journal of applied psychology, 65, 428–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. M., and Kipnis, D. (1987). The perils of persistence.Psychology Today, 21, 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, C. E., & Bartol, K. M. (1980). Sex effects on emergent leadership.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Abstract of the United States,1988, 108th ed. Washington, D. C: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 376.

  • Steinberg, R., & Shapiro, S. (1980). Sex differences in personality traits of female and male master of business administration students.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 306–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexley, K. N., & Pulakos, E. D. (1982). Sex effects on performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads: A field study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DuBrin, A.J. Sex differences in endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies. J Bus Psychol 4, 3–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023035

Keywords

Navigation