Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of magnetic atoms on the properties of ternary superconductors

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It is noteworthy that while only two classes of systems (the Chevrel phases and the rare-earth rhodium borides) have so far received extensive study, nonetheless a great many new phenomena have been encountered. This, however, should only be considered the beginning of a new and potentially very rich field, especially if one considers the vast number of possibilities of ternary compounds that can be produced. To take only one other example, recent work has shown that the compound Sc2Fe3Si5 is superconducting with a superconducting transition of 4.5 K (29). This at first may appear surprising since ever in the Chevrel phase materials, the addition of Fe atoms is detrimental to superconductivity. However, recent Mossbauer effect experiments (29) have shown that the Fe in this material is not magnetic, having a magnetic moment of less than 0.03 µB. These silicides have also been made with rare-earth ions in place of the Sc(28). The compounds show magnetic transitions and are currently under investigation. Several other interesting systems have been synthesized, and it appears that many more will be coming in the near future. The results reported above have shown the utility of hyperfine data in clarifying many of the new phenomena that occur, and it should be expected that as this new field grouws, these kinds of measurements will continue to play an active role (30).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. B. Maple, in Magnetism, ed. H. Suhl (Academic Press, New York, 1973), Vol. V, p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. B. Maple, Phys. Letters A26 (1968) 513.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor'kov, Sov. Phys. JETP 12 (1961) 1243.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. T. Matthias, H. Suhl and E. Corenzwit, Phys. Rev. Letters 1 (1958) 497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. W. Anderson and H. Suhl, Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 898.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. T. Matthias and H. Suhl, Phys. Rev. Letters, 4 (1960) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a review, see S. Roth, Appl. Phys. 15 (1978) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a review, see Ø. Fischer, Appl. Phys. 16 (1978) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ø. Fischer, M. Decroux, S. Roth, R. Chevrel and M. Sergent, J. Phys. C8, L474 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. D. Dunlap, G. K. Shenoy, F. Y. Fradin, C. D. Barnet and C. W. Kimball, J. Mag. Magn. Mat. 13 (1979) 319.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Bradford and W. Marshall, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 87 (1966) 731.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Koopman, U. Engel, K. Baberschke and S. Hüfner, Sol. State Commun. 11 (1972) 1197.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Jarlborg and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. Letters 44 (1980) 178.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Pobell, in: Proc. 14th Rare Earth Conference, Fargo, North Dakota (1979) to be published.

  15. R. Odermatt, M. Hardiman and J. van Meijel, Sol. State Commun. 32 (1979) 1227.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Y. Fradin, G. K. Shenoy, B. D. Dunlap, A. T. Aldred and C. W. Kimball, Phys. Rev. Letters 38 (1977) 719.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Jarlborg and A. J. Freeman, private communication.

  18. G. Shirane, W. Thomlinson, M. Ishikawa and Ø. Fischer, Sol. State Commun. 31 (1979) 1773.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Thomlinson, G. Shirane, D. E. Moncton, M. Ishikawa and Ø. Fischer, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1978) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. E. Moncton, G. Shirane, W. Thomlinson, M. Ishikawa and Ø. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Letters 41 (1978) 1133.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. W. Lynn, D. E. Moncton, W. Thomlinson, M. Shirane and R. N. Shelton, Sol. State Commun. 26 (1978) 493.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. A. Fertig, D. C. Johnston, L. E. DeLong, R. W. McCallum, M. B. Maple and B. T. Matthias, Phys. Rev. Letters 38 (1977) 987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. R. Ott, W. Odoni, H. C. Hamaker and M. B. Maple, Phys. Letters 75A (1980) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Fulde and I. Peschel, Adv. Phys. 21 (1972) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. K. Shenoy, B. D. Dunlap, F. Y. Fradin, S. K. Sinha, C. W. Kimball, W. Potzel, F. Pröbst and G. M. Kalvius, Phys. Rev. B21 (1980) 3886.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Bolz, G. Crecelius, H. Maletta and F. Pobell, J. Low Temp. Phys. 28 (1977) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. E. Moncton, D. B. McWhan, J. Eckert, G. Shirane and W. Thomlinson, Phys. Rev. Letters 39 (1977) 1164.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. F. Braun, Phys. Letters 75A (1980) 386.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.D. Cashion, G. K. Shenoy, D. Niarchos, P. J. Viccaro and C. M. Falco, (1980) Phys. Letters (in press)

  30. G. K. Shenoy, B. D. Dunlap, F. Y. Fradin, Eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. Ternary Supperconductors, Elsevier-North-Holl and Publ. Co., N.Y. (1980)-to be published.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunlap, B.D., Shenoy, G.K. Effects of magnetic atoms on the properties of ternary superconductors. Hyperfine Interact 10, 903–913 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022029

Keywords

Navigation