Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear orientation of105Rh and95Tc in iron

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The temperature-dependent anisotropy of γ-rays following the decay of oriented95Tc and105Rh nuclei was studied with a Ge(Li) detector. Mixing coefficients of some γ-and preceding β-transitions, the spins of two intermediate levels, and the magnetic hyperfine splitting of the95Tc and105Rh ground states in an Fe host were measured. From the known hyperfine fields the following magnetic moments were deduced:

$$\begin{gathered} \mu \left( {^{105} Rh,\tfrac{{7 + }}{2}} \right) = 4.34\left( {12} \right) n.m.; \hfill \\ \mu \left( {^{95} Tc,\tfrac{{9 + }}{2}} \right) = 5.82\left( {12} \right)n.m. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Kobayashi, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 29 (1967) 134.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.J. Blin-Stoyle and M.A. Grace,Handbuch der Physik 42 (1957) 555.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.R. de Groot, H.A. Tolhoek and W.J. Huiskamp in Alpha-, beta- and gamma-Ray Spectros-copy, ed. K. Siegbahn, vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965) p. 1199.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 11 (1974) no. 4.

  5. W. Haaks, Diplomarbeit Univ. Hamburg 1975 (unpublished).

  6. J. Wese, E. Hagn, P. Kienle and G. Eska, see ref. [18] p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Behar and Z.W. Grabowski, Nucl. Phys. A196 (1972) 412.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.R. Pierson, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B1516.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.H. Bolotin and D.A. McClure, Phys. Rev. C3 (1971) 797.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Hagn, thesis TU München 1974.

  11. L. Mesko, A. Nilsson, S.A. Hjorth, M. Brenner and O. Holmlund,Nucl. Phys. A 181 (1972) 566.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.A. Cameron, I.A. Campbell, J.P. Compton, R.A.G. Lines and G. V. H. Wilson, Proc. Phys. Soc. 90 (1967) 1089.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Krämer and B.W. Huber, Z. Phys. 268 (1974) 336.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Noya, A. Arima and H. Horie, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 8 (1959) 33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Matthias, D.A. Shirley, N. Edelstein, H.J. Körner and B.A. Olsen, in Hyperfine structure and nuclear radiations (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968) p. 878.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Wannberg, J. O. Jönsson and L. Sanner, Phys. Scripta 1 (1970) 238.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.N. Stinson, A.R. Pierce, J. C. Waddington and R.G. Summers-Gill, Can. J. Phys. 49 (1971) 906.

    Google Scholar 

  18. U. Scholtze, E. Klein and W.D. Brewer, Int. Conf. on hyperfine interactions studied in nuclear reactions and decay, Uppsala, 1974, Contributed Papers, ed. E. Karlsson and R. Wäppling (Almquist et Wiksell, Uppsala, 1975), p.110.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Institut of Physics Handbook 5–244 (1957).

  20. H. D. Rüter, thesis Univ. Hamburg 1975 (unpublished).

  21. S.G. Nilsson, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 29 (1955) no. 16.

  22. G. Wittkemper, thesis Univ. Hamburg 1973 (unpublished).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wittkemper, G., Rüter, H.D., Haaks, W. et al. Nuclear orientation of105Rh and95Tc in iron. Hyperfine Interact 3, 157–169 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01021547

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01021547

Keywords

Navigation