Skip to main content
Log in

Pygidial secretions ofPasimachus subsulcatus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) deter predation byEumeces inexpectatus (Squamata: Scincidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The carabid beetlePasimachus subsulcatus is an abundant ground-dwelling insect in west central Florida that exudes a powerful mucous membrane irritant when disturbed. This secretion can be sprayed over 10 cm from the abdominal tip. The southeastern five-lined skink,Eumeces inexpectatus, is an abundant insectivorous lizard sympatric withPasimachus. We assessed the availability ofPasimachus toEumeces and found it to be within the foraging microenvironment of the lizard. Analysis ofEumeces gut contents and field feeding trials indicate thatPasimachus are not ingested by the lizard, yet arthropods of comparable size and exoskeletal thickness are ingested. The movement response ofEumeces to isolatedPasimachus secretion constituents, conducted in a modified Y-maze laboratory experiment, was used to assess the repellent capabilities of the secretion.Eumeces are consistently repelled byPasimachus secretion constituents, indicating that the beetle is protected chemically from the lizard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bissinger, B.E., andSimon, C.A. 1979. Comparison of tongue extrusions in representatives of six families of lizards.J. Herpetol. 13:133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, M.S. 1982. Chemical Defenses of Arthropods. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G.M. 1966. Stimulus control of the prey attack response in naive garter snakes.Psychol. Sci. 4:37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G.M. 1973. Chemical release of prey attack: Extension to naive newly hatched lizards,Eumeces fasciatus.Copeia 1973:178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, C.L.1923. Classification of the lizards.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 48:289–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrel, J.E., andEisner, T. 1984. Spider sedation induced by defensive chemicals of millipede prey.Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81:806–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.E. 1981. Visual guidance of predatory attack by a scincid lizard,Eumeces laticeps.Anim. Behav. 29:1126–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.E., andVitt, L.J.1986a. Thermal dependence of tongue-flicking and comments on use of tongue-flicking as an index of squamate behavior.Ethology 71:177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.E., andVitt, L.J. 1986b. Tracking of female conspecific odor trails by male broad-headed skinks (Eumeces laticeps).Ethology 71:242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.E., andVitt, L.J. 1987. Interspecific aggression in lizards of the scincid genusEumeces: Chemical detection of conspecific sexual competitors.Herpetologica 43(1):7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fazio, A., Simon, C.A., Middendorf, G.A., andRomano, D. 1977. Iguanid substrate licking: A response to novel situations inSceloporus jarrovi.Copeia 1977:706–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T. 1966. Defensive spray of a phasmatid insect.Science 148:966–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T. 1970. Chemical defense against predation in arthropods, pp. 145–172,in E. Sondheimer and J.B. Simeone (eds.). Chemical Ecology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., andDean, J. 1976. Ploy and counterploy in predator-prey interactions: Orb-weaving spiders versus bombardier beetles.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:1365–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., andMeinwald, J. 1966. Defensive secretions of arthropods.Science 153:1341–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Meinwald, J., Monro, A., andGhent, R. 1961. Defense mechanisms of arthropods- I. The composition and function of the spray of the whipscorpion,Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas) (Arachnida, Pedipalpida),J. Insect Physiol. 6:272–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Hurst, J., andMeinwald, J. 1963a. Defensive mechanisms of arthropods, XI. The structure, function, and phenolic secretion of a chordeumoid millipede and a carabid beetle.Psyche 70:94–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Switenhbank, C., andMeinwald, J. 1963b. Defensive mechanisms of arthropods III. Secretion of salicylaldehyde by a carabid beetle.Ann. Entomol, Soc. Am. 56:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Kriston, L., andAneshansley, D.J. 1976. Defensive behavior of a termite (Nasuti-termes exitiosus).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1:83–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Wiemer, D.F., Haynes, L.W., andMeinwald, J. 1978. Lucibufagins: Defensive steroids from the firefliesPhotinus ignitus andP. marginellus (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:905–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Hill, D., Goetz, M., Jain, S., Alsop, D., Camazine, S., andMeinwald, J. 1981. Antifeedant action of z-dihydromatricaria acid from soldier beetles (Chauliognathus spp.).J. Chem. Ecol. 7:1149–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, H.S. 1954. Life history and ecology of the five-lined skink,Eumeces fasciatus.Univ. Kans. Pub. Mus. Nat. Hist. 8:1–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D.J. 1972. The structure of pygidial defense glands of Carabidae.Trans. Zool. Soc. London 32:249–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefson, M., Meinwald, J., Nowicki, S., Hicks, K., andEisner, T. 1983. Chemical defense of a rove beetle.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.H., Conner, W.E., Meinwald, J., Eisner, H.E., andEisner, T. 1976. Benzoyl cyanide and mandelonitrile in the cyanogenetic secretion of a centipede.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loop, M.S., andScovile, S.A. 1972. Responses of newbornEumeces inexpectatus to prey object extracts.Herpetologica 28:254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoY, E.D. 1987. The ground-dwelling beetles of periodically burned plots of sandhill.Fl. Entomol. 70(l):31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P.A., Bellas, T.E., andEisner, T. 1976. Eucalyptus oils in the defensive oral discharge of Australian sawfly larvae.Oecologia 24:193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushinsky, H.R. 1985. Fire and the Florida sandhill herpetofaunal community: With special attention to responses ofCnemidophorus sexlineatus.Herpetologica 41:333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletto, P.F. 1985. The relative roles of vision and olfaction in prey detection by the ground skink,Scincella lateralis.J. Herpetol. 19(3):411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C.A. 1983. A review of lizard chemoreception, pp. 119–133,in R.B. Huey, E.R. Pianka, and T.W. Schoener (eds.). Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolanoff, J., Kluge, A.F., Meinwald, J., Mcphail, A., Miller, R.W., Hicks, K., andEisner, T. 1975. A novel terpenoid insect repellent produced by a millipede.Science 188:734–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 704–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt, L.J., andCooper, W.E., Jr. 1986. Foraging and diet of a diurnal predator on hidden prey.J. Herpetol. 20:408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, P., andBrockhusen-Holzer, F. Von. 1984. Ants as prey of juvenileAnolis lineatopus (Rept, Iguanidae) in prey choice experiments.Z. Tierpsychol. 65:66–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witz, B.W., Mushinsky, H.R. Pygidial secretions ofPasimachus subsulcatus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) deter predation byEumeces inexpectatus (Squamata: Scincidae). J Chem Ecol 15, 1033–1044 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015197

Key words

Navigation