Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of monoterpene odors on food selection by red deer calves (Cervus elaphus)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of red deer calves (Cervus elaphus) to the odors of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and lodgepole pine (Pinus conforta) needles and five monoterpene constituents of their essential oils was measured by simple two-choice feeding trials. All odors were significantly rejected (P < 0.05) except Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine by females and Sitka spruce and alpha-terpineol by males. Females had a stronger dislike of all odors except lodgepole pine than males. Rejection of monoterpene odors weakened slightly with time. A strong logarithmic relationship between the strength of the rejection response and vapor pressure of the compounds tested suggested that the odors were rejected on the basis of concentration rather than quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, G.W., andHill, J.L. 1972. Chemical factors affecting selection of food plants by ruminants, pp. 71–101,in J.B. Harbourne (ed.). Phytochemical Ecology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G.W., De Boer, E.S., andBoundy, C.A.P. 1980. The influence of odour and taste on the food preferences and food intake of sheep.Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31:571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolly, G.E., Ellison, B.O., Fleming, J.W., Geng, S., Kepner, R.E., Longhurst, W.M., Oh, J.H., andRussell, G.F. 1980. Deer browsing of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees in relation to volatile terpene composition and in vitro fermentability.For. Sci. 26(2):179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R.L., Shaman, P., andDann, M. 1984. Development of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function.Physiol. Behav. 32:489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T.E. 1954. Vapor Pressures of Organic Compounds. Interscience Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruska, D., andStephan, H. 1973. Volumenvergleich allokortikaler Hirnzentren bei Wild und Hausschwein.Acta Anat. 84:387–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, W.M.,Oh, H.K.,Jones, M.B., andKepner, R.E. 1968. A basis for the palatibility of deer forage plants. 33rd North American Wildlife Conference, pp. 181–192.

  • Nagy, J.G., Steinhoff, H.W., andWard, G.M. 1964. Effects of essential oils of sagebrush on deer rumen microbial function.J. Wildl. Manage. 28(4):785–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narjisse, H. 1981. The acceptability of big sagebrush to sheep and goats: Role of monoterpenes. PhD thesis. Utah State University.

  • Oh, H.K., Sakai, T., Jones, M.B., andLonghurst, W.M. 1967. Effects of various essential oils isolated from Douglas-fir needles upon sheep and deer rumen activity.Appl. Microbiol. 15(4):777–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J.H., Jones, M.B., Longhurst, W.M., andConnolly, G.E. 1970. Deer browsing and rumen microbial fermentation as affected by fertilization and growth stage.For. Sci. 16:21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottoson, D. 1963. Some aspects of the function of the olfactory system.Pharmacol. Rev. 15:1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, W.W. 1971. Volatile oil content and consumption of juniper and its effects on deer rumen microbes. MSc thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radwan, M.A. 1972. Differences between Douglas-fir genotypes in relation to browsing preference by black-tailed deer.Can. J. For. Res. 2:250–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, P. R., andChurch, D.C. 1974. Taste responses of deer to browse extracts, organic acids and odors.J. Wildl. Manage. 38(4):830–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C.C., Nagy, J.G., andRegelin, W.L. 1980a. Juniper oil yield, terpinoid concentration and antimicrobial effects on deer.J. Wildl. Manage. 44:107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C.C., Regelin, W.L., andNagy, J.G. (1980b). Deer preference for juniper forage and volatile oil treated foods.J. Wildl. Manage. 44:114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D.M. (1980).The Ecology of Vertebrate Olfaction. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, D.E. (1949). The importance of the sense of smell to grazing sheep.J. Agric. Sci. Cambr. 39:309–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, B.L. andPederson, J.C. (1981).In-vitro digestibility among accessions of big sagebrush by wild mule deer and its relationship to monoterpinoid content.J. Range Manage. 34:380–384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Forestry Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, S., Loudon, A. Effects of monoterpene odors on food selection by red deer calves (Cervus elaphus). J Chem Ecol 13, 1343–1349 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012281

Key words

Navigation