Skip to main content
Log in

Jurors' knowledge of battered women

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increasing number of psychologists with expertise in the area of battered women are participating in the legal system as expert witnesses and occasionally testify on behalf of a battered woman who has injured or killed her partner. Testimony about the battered woman syndrome has been offered to help the jury understand why the defendant reasonably perceived that she was in danger of harm. One of the requirements of expert testimony is that it be beyond the common understanding of the jury. Many commentators assume that jurors are uninformed or misinformed about battered women and, thus, that expert testimony is necessary to educate them. This study evaluated what jurors know about violent relationships. Approximately 300 jurors read scenarios about spousal violence and answered a questionnaire dealing with circumstances surrounding such abuse. Results suggest that on certain dimensions of spousal violence, jurors are aware of empirical research findings. On other dimensions, jurors are less well-informed and could potentially benefit from the testimony of an expert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. R., and Toch, H. (1985). Battered women, straw men and expert testimony: A comment onState v. Kelly.Crim. Law Bull. 21: 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. G., and Wyman, E. (1978). Battered wives and powerlessness: What can counselors do?Victimology 3: 545–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, M. (1971). The study and modification of intra-familial violence. InThe Control of Aggression and Violence: Cognitive and Psychological, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. (1987).When Battered Women Kill, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrle v. State (1981). 627-P. 2d 1374.

  • Comment (1983). Expert testimony on the battered wife syndrome: A question of admissibility in the prosecution of the battered wife for the killing of her husband.St. Louis Univ. Law J. 27: 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker (1985). The meaning of equality for battered women who kill men in self-defense.Harv. Wom. Law J. 121: 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. A. (1987). The battered woman syndrome. In Sonkin, D. J. (ed.),Domestic Violence on Trial, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M. B. (1982). The expert as educator: A proposed approach to the use of battered woman syndrome expert testimony.Vanderbilt Law Review 35: 741–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton and Painter (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachments in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse.Victimology 6: 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyas V. U. S. (1977). 376 A. 2d 827.

  • Eber, J. (1981). The battered wife's dilemma: To kill or to be killed.Hastings Law J. 32: 895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A., and Seymour, E. (1980). Defending battered women: A model voir dire.Trial Magazine, 30–31.

  • Ewing, C. P. (1987).Battered Women Who Kill, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, C. P., and Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: Some realities about the myths.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigman, D. L. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defense: A legal and empirical dissent.Virginia Law Rev. 72: 619–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, and Johnson (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization.Social Problems 30: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H. (1979). Perceptions of battered wives. In Frieze, I. H., Bar-Tal, D., & Carroll, J. S. (eds.),New Approaches to Social Problems, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayford, J. J. (1975). Wife battering: A preliminary study of 100 cases.Brit. Med. J. 195.

  • Gelles, R. J. (1974).The Violent Home, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne v. State (1982). 415 So. 2d 1361.

  • Hilberman, E. (1980). Overview: The “wife-beater's wife” is reconsidered.Am. J. Psychiat. 137: 1336–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberman, E., and Munson, D. (1978). Sixty battered women.Victimology 2: 460–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn-Tamas v. U. S. (1979). 407 A. 2d 626.

  • Jones, A. (1980).Women Who Kill, Fawcett Columbine Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmuss, D. S., and Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse.J. Marr. Fam. 44: 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFave, W., and Scott, A. (1972).Handbook of Criminal Law, West Publishing, St. Paul, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1976).Battered Wives, Glide Publications, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, T. (1984). Victimization and self-esteem: On equating husband abuse and wife abuse.Victimology 9: 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. M. (1979).Battered Women, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisonoff, L., and Bitman, I. (1979). Spouse abuse: Incidence and relationship to selected demographic variables.Victimology 4: 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, L. (1986).Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagelow, M. D. (1981).Woman Battering: Victims and Their Experiences, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • People v. Torres (1985). 388 NY Supp. 2d. 358.

  • Radloff, L. S., and Rae, D. S. (1981). Components of the sex difference in depression.Res. Commun. Ment. Health 2: 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenmeyer, S. D. (1981). Of battered wives, self-defense, and double-standards of justice.J. Crim. Just. 9: 389–3395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider (1980). Equal rights to trial for women: Sex bias in the law of self-defense.Harvard C.R.-C.L. Law Rev. 15: 623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith v. State (1981). 247 Ga. 612, 277 SE 2d 678.

  • Sonkin, D. J., and Fazio, W. (1987). Domestic violence expert testimony in the prosecution of male batterers. In Sonkin, D. J. (ed.),Domestic Violence on Trial, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • State v. Kelly (1984). 97 NLJ 178, 478 A. 2d 364.

  • State v. Martin (1984). 666 SW 2d 895.

  • State v. Thomas (1981). 66 Ohio St. 2d 518, 423 NE 2d 137.

  • Steinmetz, S., and Straus, M. (1974).Violence in the Family, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1978). Wife beating: Causes, treatment, and research needs. InBattered Women: Issues of Public Policy, Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M., Gellels, R., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J., and Barbour, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thar, A. E. (1982). The admissibility of expert testimony on battered wife syndrome: An evidentiary analysis.Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 77: 348–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyfault, R. (1984). Self-defense: Battered woman syndrome on trial.Calif. West. Law Rev. 20: 485–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyfault, R. K., Bennett, C. E., and Hirschborn, R. B. (1987a). Battered women in court: Jury and trial consultants and expert witnesses. In Sonkin, D. J. (ed.),Domestic Violence on Trial, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyfault, R. K., Browne, A., and Walker, L. E. (1987b). When battered women kill: Evaluation and expert witness testimony techniques. In Sonkin, D. J. (ed.),Domestic Violence on Trial, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totman, J. (1978).Murderess-A Psychological Study of Criminal Homicide, R and E Associates, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. v. Hearst (1976). 412 F. Supp 889.

  • Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1982). Expert testimony and battered women: Conflict among the courts and a proposal.J. Legal Med. 3: 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1984).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E., Thyfault, R. K., and Browne, A. (1982). Beyond the juror's ken: Battered women.Vermont Law Rev. 7: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, P. D. (1982). Expert testimony and battered women: Conflict among the courts and a proposal.J. Leg. Med. 3: 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, N. (1979). Victim provocation: The battered wife and legal definition of self defense.Sociological Symp. 25: 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, E., Raitz, A. & Lindblad, H. Jurors' knowledge of battered women. J Fam Viol 4, 105–125 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006624

Key words

Navigation