Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Bedeutung der Proterosporen: Schlußfolgerungen aus Untersuchungen anGanoderma (Basidiomycetes)

The significance of proterospores: Conclusions from studies ofGanoderma (Basidiomycetes)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proterospores are formed exclusively at the beginning of the sporulation period and independently of abiotic factors. They differ both morphologically and physiologically from other spores developed later by the same fruit-body. As seen inGanoderma, proterospores germinate readily, whereas other spores must first pass through a fly larva gut. These proterospores are therefore well adapted to dispersal by air, the other spores, however, to dispersal by animals. In this respect, ontogenesis appears to recapitulate phylogeny. A comparative study of proterospores should further clarify systematic relationships within the fungi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Banerjee, S., Sarkar, A., 1959: Spore-forms in sporophores ofGanoderma lucidum (Leyss.)Karst. — Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (B)49, 94–98, Abb. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bary, A. de, 1870: Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze. Dritte Reihe. — Abh. Senckenb. Naturf. Ges.7, 361–455, Taf. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bary, A. de, 1884: Vergleichende Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Mycetozoen und Bacterien. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbit, T. F., Crang, R. E., 1975: Basidiocarp development of the two varieties ofPanus tigrinus and their light-induced abnormal forms. — Mycologia67 (1), 182–187, Abb. 1–9. (Die Art ist falsch bestimmt.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S. R., 1935: Cytology of secondary spore formation inGanoderma. — Phytopathology25, 426–429, Abb. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1940: Moisture-relation as a determining factor in the transformation of the basidia of certainPolyporaceae. — Nature145, 706.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1943: Moisture-relation as a determinant factor in the transformation of the basidia of certainPolyporaceae. — Mycologia35, 33–46, Abb. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdot, H., Galzin, A., 1928 („1927“): Hyménomycètes de France. Hétérobasidiés — Homobasidiés Gymnocarpes. — Sceaux: M. Bry. — Reprint 1969, Lehre: J. Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, A. H. R., 1924: Researches on Fungi. III. — London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1933: Researches on Fungi. V. — London, New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clémençon, H., 1977: Die Strukturen der Basidiosporenwand und des Apikulus, und deren Beziehung zur Exogenisation der Spore. — Persoonia9 (3), 363–380, Abb. 1–4, Taf. 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corda, A. C. J., Zobel, J. B., 1854: Icones fungorum hucusque cognitorum. VI. — Prag: F. Ehrlich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1936:Hygrophorus with dimorphous basidiospores. — Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.20 (2), 157–184, Abb. 1–8, Taf. A–B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, A. D., 1913: On the production of imperfectly developed spores in theAgaricaceae. — Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.4, 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diedicke, H., 1911: Die GattungPhomopsis. — Ann. Mycol.9, 8–35, Taf. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, E. G., Galbraith, M. H., 1973: Variation in the dimensions of basidiospores during the discharge period. — Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.60, 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E., 1866: Generelle Morphologie der Organismen2: Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen. — Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G. G., 1929: Life-history studies of the species ofPhomopsis occurring on Conifers. Part I. — Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15, 32–93, Abb. 1–29, Tab. 1–8, Taf. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, W. F., 1926: The inheritance of spore size inCoprinus sterquilinus. — Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.11, 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, R., Perreau, J., 1964: Les genresPorphyrellus etStrobilomyces au Mexique. — Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr.80 (1), 88–101, Abb. 1–18, Tab. 1, Taf. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhnel, F. von, 1903: Mykologische Fragmente. XXVIII–XLI. — Ann. Mycol.1, 522–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1904: ÜberMyxosporium Tulasnei, Myxolibertella undSporodiniopsis. — Ann. Mycol.2, 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1906: Fragmente zur Mykologie. (II. Mitteilung, Nr. 64–91). — Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Mathem.-Naturw. Kl. (Abt. 1)115, 1–47, Abb. 1–2. — Reprint 1967, Lehre: J. Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, H., Kotlaba, F., Pouzar, Z., 1980:Ganoderma atkinsonii Jahn, Kotl. etPouz., spec. nova, a parallel species toGanoderma lucidum. — Westf. Pilzbr.11 (6), 97–121, Abb. 1–9, Taf. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebahn, H., 1918: Haupt- und Nebenfruchtformen derAskomyzeten. Erster Teil. Eigene Untersuchungen. — Leipzig: Borntraeger. — Reprint 1968, Lehre: J. Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, T. M., 1977: Production, germination and dispersal of basidiospores ofGanoderma pseudoferreum onHevea. — J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaysia25 (2), 93–99, Tab. 1–2, Abb. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, F. I., Toole, E. R., 1969: Sporophore development and sporulation ofPolyporus hispidus. — Phytopathology59, 884–885, Abb. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F., 1864: Für Darwin. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niel, C. B. van, Garner, G. E., Cohen, A. L., 1972: On the mechanism of ballistospore discharge. — Arch. Mikrobiol.84, 129–140, Abb. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, I., 1975: Zur Ökologie der Porlinge. Untersuchungen über die Sporulation einiger Porlinge und die an ihnen gefundenen Käferarten. — Bibl. Mycol.45. — Vaduz: J. Cramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Untersuchungen zur systematischen Stellung der GattungPolyporus. — Hoppea39, 127–198, Abb. 1–31, Tab. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otta, J. D., 1978: Alpha and beta spore occurence inPhomopsis juniperovora pycnidia onJuniperus virginiana and in culture. — Can. J. Bot.56, 727–728, Tab. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegler, D. N., Young, T. W. K., 1971: Basidiospore morphology in theAgaricales. — Beih. Nova Hedwigia35.

  • Perreau, J., 1973: Contribution à l'étude des ornaments sporaux chez lesGanodermes. — Rev. Mycol.37 (5), 241–252, Abb. 1, Taf. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Développement, morphologie et structure de la basidiospore (chez les Homobasidiomycètes). — L'Inform. Scientif.2, 55–75, Abb. 1–2, Taf. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoebus, P., 1842: Über den Keimkörper-Apparat der Agaricinen und Helvellaceen. — Verh. Kais. Leop.-Carol. Akad. Naturf.19(2), 169–248, Taf. 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehsteiner, H., 1892: Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Fruchtkörper einigerGastromyceten. — Bot. Z.50, 761–771, 777–792, 801–814, 823–839, 843–863, 865–878, Abb. 15–17, Taf. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D., 1979:Conocybe aporos with dimorphic spores. — Bull. Brit. Mycol. Soc.13 (1), 34–35, Abb. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders, A. F. M., 1979: Developmental anatomy ofCoprinus. — Persoonia10 (3), 383–424, Abb. 1–55, Tab. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., 1855: Morphologie desCrucibulum vulgare Tulasne. — Bot. Z.13, 833–845, 849–861, Taf. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, A., 1959: Spore-Germination ofGanoderma lucidum (Leyss.)Karst. — Sci. Cult.24 (11), 524–525, Abb. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. H., 1966: The hyphal structure of the basidiocarp. — InAinsworth, G. C., Sussman, A. S., (Eds.): The Fungi — An Advanced Treatise2, 151–177. — New York and London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soehner, E., 1962, (Ed.:Poelt, J.): Die GattungHymenogaster Vitt. — Eine monographische Studie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der bayerischen Arten. — Beih. Nova Hedwigia2.

  • Steyaert, R. L., 1972: Species ofGanoderma and related genera mainly of the Bogor and Leiden Herbaria. — Persoonia7 (1), 55–118, Abb. 1–9, Taf. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirring, E., 1956: Über das Vorkommen sehr verschieden gestalteter Sporenformen an einem und demselben Fruchtkörper einesCortinarius. — Z. Pilzk.22 (1), 5–13, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulasne, L.-R., Tulasne, Ch., 1851: Fungi hypogaei — Histoire et Monographie des Champignons Hypogés. — Paris: Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Botanik, Universität Regensburg, Postfach 397, D-8400, Regensburg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    I. Nuss

Authors
  1. I. Nuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuss, I. Die Bedeutung der Proterosporen: Schlußfolgerungen aus Untersuchungen anGanoderma (Basidiomycetes). Pl Syst Evol 141, 53–79 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006479

Key words

Search

Navigation