Abstract
A sample of 49 chronic headache patients (35 vascular and 14 tension) was separated according to capacity for absorption (as measured by Tellegen & Atkinson's 1974 scale) into groups high in absorption and groups low in absorption, with patients in the middle range being excluded. Absorption capacity was found to affect response to treatment in complex ways. Vascular headache patients high in absorption were significantly improved following relaxation training, but not after biofeedback training. Vascular headache patients low in absorption were significantly improved after biofeedback training. Tension headache patients low in absorption did not respond significantly to either form of treatment, while those high in absorption responded significantly to biofeedback training. Reasons for these differences in response to treatment were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ad Hoc Committee on Classification of Headache. Classification of headache.Journal of the American Medical Association 1962,6 717–718.
Andrasik, F., Blanchard, E. B., Arena, J. G., Teders, S. J., Teevan, R. C., & Rodichok, L. D. Psychological functioning in headache sufferers.Psychosomatic Medicine 1982,44 171–182.
Bernstein, D. A., & Borkovec, T. D.Progressive relaxation training. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1973.
Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., Ahles, T. A., Teders, S. J., & O'Keefe, D. Migraine and tension headache: A meta-analytic review.Behavior Therapy 1980,11 613–631.
Blanchard, E. B., Andrasik, F., & Silver, B. V. Biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of tension headache: A reply to Belar.Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1980,3 227–232.
Blanchard, E. B., Theobald, D. E., Williamson, D. A., Silver, B. V., & Brown, D. A. Temperature biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headache.Archives of General Psychiatry 1978,35 581–588.
Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Capacity for absorption and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback and no-feedback conditions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1979,88 652–662.
Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Electromyograph biofeedback as a relaxation technique: A critical appraisal and reassessment.Psychological Bulletin 1981,90 21–42. (a)
Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981,110 204–216. (b)
Qualls, P. J., & Sheehan, P. W. Imagery encouragement, absorption capacity and relaxation during electromyograph biofeedback.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,41 370–379. (c)
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”): A trait related to hynotic susceptibility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 268–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, NS-15235.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neff, D.F., Blanchard, E.B. & Andrasik, F. The relationship between capacity for absorption and chronic headache patients' response to relaxation and biofeedback treatment. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 8, 177–183 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000547
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000547