Abstract
Starting from the observation that the technological potentials are underutilized in economic and in social tems, this article raises the question of what role technology assessment (TA) can play in technology policy to address this problem. The causes of the problem of underutilization are analyzed and discussed in relation to developments in technology policy and TA. Against this background, the actual state of TA in Europe at national and supranational levels is described, gaps and flaws in the European TA Infrastructure (ETAI) are identified, and suggestions for improvement are made. It is concluded that TA can play an important role in increasing the social and economic returns on investments in the development of new technology. Growing interest in, and budgets for, TA at European level — together with the shift from a supply side toward a more demand oriented technology policy — create a favorable environment for this. However, attempts to strengthen TA will only be successful if the TA community recognizes this role and is not satisfied with the marginal position it still has.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, E. S. and B. A. Lundvall (1998). ‘Small national systems of innovation facing technological revolutions: An analytical framework,’ in C. Freeman and B. A. Lundvall eds.Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 9–36.
Bijker, W.E. and J. Law, (eds.) (1992).Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boroush, M., K. Chen and A. Christakis (1980).Technology Assessment: Creative Futures: Perspectives from and beyond the Second International Congress. New York: Elsevier North Holland.
Caplan, N. (1976). ‘Social research and national policy: What gets used by whom, for what purposes and with what effects?’International Social Science Journal 28 (1).
Clark, N. and C. Juma (1987).Long Run Economics: An Evolutionary Approach to Economic Growth. London: Pinter Publishers.
Coenen, R. (1992). ‘The institutionalization of parliamentary technology assessment in various countries,’ in Institute for Theory and History of Science, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences and Department for Applied Systems Analysis, Nuclear Research Center, eds.Technology Assessment and its Role in Processes of Societal Transofrmation in Central and East European Countries. Prague/Karlsruhe: Institute for Theory and History of Science, Czecho-slovak Academy of Sciences/Department for Applied Systems Analysis, Nuclear Research Center, pp. 164–181a.
Daey Ouwens, C. (1987).Constructief technologisch aspectenonderzoek. The Hague: Netherlands Organisation for Technology Assessment.
Dankbaar, B., Th. van Dijk, L. Soete and B. Verspagen (1991).Technologie en wetenschapsbeleid in veranderende economische theorievorming. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (1988).Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
Dunn, W. (1980). ‘The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: An exploratory case survey,’Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1 (4).
Dijk, J. W. A. van and N. van Hulst (1988).Grondslagen van het techno logiebeleid. Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische Zaken.
Ford G. and G. Lake (1991). ‘Evolution of European science and technology policy,’Science and Public Policy 18:38–50.
Freeman, C. (1987).Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1994).Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hertog P, and A. Leyten (1992). ‘Social embedding of technology: A policy approach: Stimulating the demand side in the Netherlands. A paper prepared within the framework of the CEC DG XIII Public Strategy Observer Network. Apeldoorn: TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies.
Hippel, E. von (1988).The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, D. (1990).The Policy Relevance of Diffusion. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs.
Johnson, B. (1988). ‘An institutional approach to the small-country problem,’ in C. Freeman and B. A. Lundvall, eds.Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 279–297.
Leyten A. and R. Smits (1987).The Revival of Technology Assessment: Development of TA in Five European Countries and the United States of America. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Education and Science in cooperation with the Netherlands Organisation for Technology Assessment and the Commission of the European Communities (DGXII/FAST).
Masuda, Y. (1981).The Information Society as Post-industrial Society. Bethesda: World Future Society.
Nelkin, D. and M. Pollak (1979). ‘Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusions?’Technology Review (August/September).
Nelson, R., S. Winter (1977). ‘In search of a useful theory of innovation,’Research Policy 6: 36–76.
Nora, S. and A. Minc (1980).The Computerizing of Society: A Report to the President of France. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
OECD (1988).New Technologies in the 90s: A Socio-Economic Strategy. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD (1991).Technology in a Changing World. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
OTA (1990).Critical Connections: Communications for the Future. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States.
Paschen, H., T. Petermann, J. Schevitz and R. Smits (1989). ‘Review of TA-institutionalization in selected OECD-countries,’ a paper presented at the OECD-conference on technology assessment, Vienna (June).
Perez C. (1983). ‘Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems,’Futures 15: 357–375.
Rich, R. (1979). ‘Systems of analysis, technology assessment and bureaucratic power,’American Behavioral Scientist 22 (3).
Roobeek, A. (1988).Een race zonder finish. De rol van de overheid in de technologiewedloop. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
Schot, J. (1992). ‘Constructive technology assessment and technology dynamics: The case of clean technologies,’Science, Technology and Human Values 17: 36–56.
Smits, R., P. den Hertog and E. van der Schaft (1992).Initiatives to Strengthen the Interface between EC-R&D and Society. Report commissioned by CEC DG XIII VALUE II Programme. Apeldoorn: TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies.
Smits, R., P. den Hertog and J. Kuijper (1993).Three Clusters of Related Activities to Stimulate the European Technology Assessment Infrastructure (ETAI). Report commissioned by CEC DG XIII VALUE II Programme. Apeldoorn: TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies.
Smith, R. and A. Leyten (1988). ‘Key issues in the institutionalization of technology assessment,’Futures (February).
Smits, R. and T. Weijers (1990).State of the Art of Technology Assessment in Europe. Report to the 2nd European Congress on Technology Assessment. Brussels: CEC DGXII FAST Programme.
Smits, R. adn A. Leyten (1991).Technology Assessment: Waakhond of speurhond? Op weg naar een integraal technologiebeleid. Zeist: Kerckebosch BV.
Szyperski, N. and U. M. Richter (1983). ‘A constructive approach for impact research on information technology,’ in N. Szypersky, eds.,Assessing the Impacts of Information Technology. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Toth, F.L. (1988). ‘Policy exercises,’Simulation and Games 19 (3).
Vig, N. J. (1992). ‘Parliamentary technology assessment in Europe: Comparative evolution,’ a paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6.
Vrolijk, H. and P. den Hertog (1990). ‘Institutionalization of technology assessment and prospective activities,’ Annex 3 of the 1st Biennial Report. Brussels: CEC DGXII Fast Programme.
Weiss, C. (1980). ‘Knowledge creep and decision accretion,’Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1 (3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smits, R., Leyten, J. & Den Hertog, P. Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures. Policy Sci 28, 271–299 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000290
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000290