Skip to main content
Log in

Response: Toward a critical sociology of policy analysis

  • Book Review Essay
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Benhabib, Seyla (1992).Situating the Self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard (1971).Praxis and Action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard (1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard (1983).Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1927).The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John (1990).Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John (1995). ‘Critical theory as a research program,’ in Stephen White, ed.The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray (1971).Politics as Symbolic Action. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha (1989).Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank and John Forester (1993).The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, John (1987). ‘Anticipating implementation: Normative practices in planning and policy analysis,’ in Frank Fischer and John Forester, eds.,Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, John (1989).Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, John (1993).Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, John (1980).Power and Powerlesness: Quiescence and Rebellion in An Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, John (1984).Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven (1974).Power: A Radical View. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary (1990).Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hanna (1972).Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Robert (1988). ‘Policy-making in a democracy,’ in hisThe Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960).The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroyer, Trent (1973).The Critique of Domination. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1980). ‘A day in the life of the socialist citizen,’ inRadical Principles. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forester, J. Response: Toward a critical sociology of policy analysis. Policy Sci 28, 385–396 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000252

Keywords

Navigation