Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Between state and market: Hegemony and institutions of collective action under conditions of international capital mobility

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article rejects the atomistic conception of international capital mobility as individual, uncoordinated decision-making. It argues that non-state institutions exist in the global political economy which condition the thoughts and actions that comprise the investment process. Because these structure investment, such institutions can be understood as private makers of global public policy. Credit rating agencies are used as an example of these mechanisms. The article examines transformations in the organization of capital markets which underpin the greater influence of these agencies. Functional accounts of rating institutions are evaluated, and their scope for transcending a strict agency role with regard to investors is assessed, based on their possession of specialized forms of knowledge from which they derive control. Some description of the agencies, their international growth and the ratings process is provided. Three arguments about the pressures on the economic and financial structures identified by Zysman (1983) generated by rating agencies are considered. Rating institutions create pressures for fundamental analyss of investment, for a particular view of appropriate management forms and policy lines along new constitutionalist lines, and contribute to a more abstract investment process which is likely to have the effect of transforming social relationships within the dominant alliances of social forces. The article concludes with some consideration of the implications of these hybrid forms of authority and policy for world order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan, N. (1993). ‘The credit minders,’Far Eastern Economic Review July 22: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannock, Graham, R. E. Baxter and Evan Davis (1987).Dictionary of Economics. London: Hutchinson/The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannock, Graham and William Manser (1989).International Dictionary of Finance. London: Hutchinson/The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, Ralph (1993). ‘As the number of private guards grows, police learn to enlist their help,’The New York Times, July 13: A16.

  • Bruce, Rupert (1992). ‘Debt-rating agencies fill the gap,’The International Herald Tribune November 14–15: 11.

  • Cluff, George S. and Paul G. Farnham (1985). ‘A problem of discrete choice: Moody's municipal bond ratings,’Journal of Economics and Business 37: 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. (1992). ‘Global perestroika,’ in Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch, eds.,New World Order? Socialist Register 1992. London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. (1993). ‘Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method,’ in Stephen Gill, ed.,Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Courcy Hinds, Michael (1990). ‘Its money running out, Philadelphia offers plan,’The New York Times, November 19: 8.

  • de Courcy Hinds, Michael (1992a). ‘Philadelphia mayor proposes bailout,’The New York Times, February 21: A12.

  • de Courcy Hinds, Michael (1992b). ‘Philadelpha getting credit for reversing a fiscal fall,’The New York Times, May 21: B14.

  • de Courcy Hinds, Michael (1993). ‘Philadelphia climbs out of fiscal depths and builds by sharing sacrifices,’The New York Times, April 6: A19.

  • Downes, John and Jordan Elliot Goodman (1991).Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms. New York: Barron's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, The (1991). ‘Beyond the second opinion,’ March 30, 1991: 80.

  • Economist, The (1992). ‘Time to leave: A survey of world banking,’ May 2.

  • Economist, The (1993a). ‘Running New York City: Rot at the core,’ May 8: 23–25.

  • Economist, The (1993b). ‘Privatization: Selling the state,’ August 21: 18–20.

  • Economist, The (1993c). ‘Detroit's mayor: A job fit for heroes,’ August 28: 26.

  • Economist, The (1993d). ‘Sovereign debt: The ratings game,’ October 30: 88–90.

  • Economist, The (1994). ‘Recalled to Life: A survey of international banking,’ April 30.

  • Elliott, Margaret A. (1988). ‘Rating the debt raters,’Institutional Investor, December: 109–112.

  • Euromoney (1991). ‘OK, so what is quality?’Euromoney Supplement, September: 36–44.

  • Ferguson, Yale H. and Richard W. Mansbach (1991). ‘Between celebration and despair: Constructive suggestions for future international theory,’International Studies Quarterly 35: 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparino, Charles (1992). ‘Moody's warns political impasse may affect rating of N.Y. County,’The Bond Buyer August 18: 1.

  • Gill, Stephen (1993). ‘Gramsci and global politics: Towards a post-hegemonic research agenda,’ in Stephen Gill, ed.,Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen and David Law (1988).The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen and David Law (1993). ‘Global hegemony and the structural power of capital,’ in Stephen Gill, ed.,Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Morris, David Folkerts-Landau, Mohamed El-Erian, Steven Fries, and Liliana Rojas-Suarez (1992).International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Policy Issues. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mar (1992). ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness,’ in Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberg, eds.,The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Hyman C. (1977). ‘Ingredients of municipal payment difficulties,’ unpublished monograph. New York: Standard & Poor's Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, Paul (1993). ‘Committed to paper: Thailand launches its first credit-rating agency,’Far Eastern Economic Review August 12, 1993: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, David F., Barbara A. Brown and Walter J. Campbell (1983).Rating Industrial Bonds. Morristown, N.J.: Financial Executives Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, Elizabeth (1990). ‘Bond rating: A censure of bickering,’The New York Times, March 28: B3.

  • Larrain, Jorge (1979).The Concept of Ideology. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichten, Eric (1986).Class, Power, and Austerity: The New York City Fiscal Crisis. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (1992). ‘Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of global civil society,’Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21: 389–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen (1984). ‘The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life,’The American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Peter and Nikolas Rose (1990). ‘Governing the economy,’Economy and Society 19: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Beth and Michael Schwartz (1987). ‘Sources of intercorporate unity,’ in Michael Schwartz, ed.,The Structure of Power in America: The Corporate Elite as Ruling Class. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Beth and Michael Schwartz (1990). ‘Capital flows and the process of financial hegemony,’ in Sharon Zukin and Paul DiMaggio, eds.,Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody's Investors Service (1991).Global Credit Analysis. David Stimpson, ed. London: IFR Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody's Investors Service (1993).The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in the Asian Capital Market. New York: Moody's Investors Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody's Investors Service (1994).Derivatives Risk: A Growing Credit Concern. New York: Moody's Investors Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Michael (1991).The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution: The USA, UK and Japan. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, Barbara Presley (1992). ‘A downgraded Detroit cries foul,’The New York Times, November 3: D4.

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1990).Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions of Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl (1957 [1944]).The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, John W. and Richard J. Zeckhauser (1985). ‘Principals and agents: An overview,’ in John W. Pratt and Richard J. Zeckhauser, eds.,Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. (1990).Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. (1992). ‘Governance, order, and change in world politics,’ in James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds.,Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon Brothers (1993).Evaluating Sovereign Credit Risk: A High-Yield Analysts Guide. New York: Salomon Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Timothy J. (1994). ‘Passing judgement: Credit rating processes as regulatory mechanisms of governance in the emerging world order,’Review of International Political Economy 1: 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor's Rating Group (1992).S&P's Corporate Finance Criteria. New York: Standard & Poor's Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Charles (1989). ‘Japanese agency's ratings unsettle business groups: Credit where it's due,’Far Eastern Economic Review March 2: 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan (1988).States and Markets: An Introduction to International Political Economy. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael and Sara Singleton. ‘The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems,’Politics and Society 21: 195–214.

  • Waters, Richard (1992). ‘Moody's upgrades Argentina,’The Financial Times July 14: 21.

  • White, Harrison c. (1985). ‘Agency as control,’ in John W. Pratt and Richard J. Zeckhauser, eds.,Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Tom (1988).The Bonfire of the Vanities. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wriston, Walter B. (1992).The Twilight of Sovereignty: How the Information Revolution is Transforming Our World. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, Beth V. and Robert M. Yarbrough (1990). ‘International institutions and the new economics of organization,’International Organization 44: 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, John (1983).Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Emmer, Edward Z. Executive Managing Director, Corporate Finance, Standard & Poor's Ratings Group. New York, NY, August 17, 1992.

  • Grossman, Hyman C. Managing Director, Municipal Finance Department, Standard & Poor's Ratings Group. New York, NY, August 18, 1992.

  • O'Neill, Leo C. President, Standard & Poor's Ratings Group. New York, NY, August 18, 1992.

  • Streeter, William. Managing Director, Public Finance Department, Moody's Investors Service. New York, NY, August 4, 1992. Telephone Interview.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinclair, T.J. Between state and market: Hegemony and institutions of collective action under conditions of international capital mobility. Policy Sci 27, 447–466 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000068

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000068

Keywords

Navigation