Skip to main content
Log in

Freeing money: Why have states been more willing to liberalize capital controls than trade barriers?

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates why advanced industrial states have chosen to dismantle their postwar capital controls during a period — the 1970s and 1980s — when they became less enthusiastic about eliminating trade restrictions. Four explanations are presented. First, the unique mobility and fungibility of money was important in both encouraging competitive deregulation pressures and making the control of financial movements difficult, each of which created differing collective action dynamics in the financial sector than existed in the trade field. Second, the US and Britain played a leading role in encouraging financial liberalization because they held distinct ‘hegemonic’ interests in finance that did not exist to the same degree in the trade sector. Third, domestic coalitions of neo-liberal advocates and internationally-oriented corporate interests encountered relatively little domestic political resistance to their demands for financial liberalization because of the low domestic political visibility of international financial issues. Finally, financial liberalization and trade protectionism may in fact have been directly related: it has proven difficult for states to maintain liberal practices in finance and trade at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauchard, Pierre (1986).La Guerre Des Deux Roses: Du Rêve à la Réalité 1981–85. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, Tony (1989).Against the Tide: Diaries 1973–76. London: Hutchison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, Raymond (1981). ‘The liberalization of capital movements: An insight,’Three Banks Review 132: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Arthur (1946). ‘The postwar control of international capital movements,’American Economic Review 36: 687–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Ralph (1987).International Financial Intermediation. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kathleen and Alec Cairncross (1992).‘Goodbye, Great Britain’: 1976 IMF Crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Kent (1988). ‘Japanese foreign economic policy formation: Explaining the reactive state,’World Politics 40: 517–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, James (1987).Time and Change. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Phil (1989). “The little big bang in Paris: Financial market deregulation in adirigiste system,’European Journal of Political Research 17: 169–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, Jerry and Lawrence Harris (1992). ‘Financial globalization and deregulation,’ in Jonathan Michie, ed.,The Economic Legacy 1979–1992. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Benjamin (1989). ‘European financial integration and national banking interests,’ in P. Guerrieri and P. C. Padoan, eds.,The Political Economy of European Integration. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conybeare, John 1984). ‘Public goods, prisoners' dilemmas and the international political economy,’International Studies Quarterly 28: 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conybeare, John (1988).US Foreign Economic Policy and the International Capital Markets: The Case of Capital Export Controls 1963–74. New York: Garland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Richard (1984).The Regulation of International Banking. Cambridge: Woodhead-Faulkner.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cecco, Marcello (1987). ‘Inflation and the structural change in the eurodollar market,’ in Marcello De Cecco and Jean-Paul Fitoussi, eds.,Monetary Theory and Economic Institutions. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destler, I. and C. Randall Henning (1989).Dollar Politics: Exchange Rate Policymaking in the US. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Roger (1987).Towards Prosperity. Auckland: D. Bateman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkyo, Yoichi (1989). ‘Financial innovation and international safeguards: Causes and consequences of ‘structural innovation’ in the US and global financial system: 1973–86.’ Ph.D. Dissertation, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, M. June (1989).International Monetary Economics, 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey (1984).The Yen-Dollar Agreement: Liberalizing Japanese Capital Markets. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (1984). ‘A public choice view of international political economy,’International Organization 38: 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, Jeffry (1991). ‘Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance,’International Organization 45: 425–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesbert, Franz-Oliver (1990).Le Président. Paris: Editions de Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert (1987).The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, John and Louis Pauly (1993). ‘The obsolescence of capital controls? Economic management in an age of global markets,’World Politics 46: 50–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, Jack and Richard Herring (1983).The Lender-of-Last-Resort Function In An International Context. Princeton: Princeton University, Essays in International Finance, no. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, Koichi and Hugh Patrick (1988). ‘Japan and the international monetary regime,’ in Takashi Inoguchi and Daniel Okimoto, eds.,The Political Economy of Japan, Vol. 2,The Changing International Context. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Adrian (1986).The Financial Revolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, James (1984). ‘Protecting capital from itself: US attempts to regulate the eurocurrency system,’International Organization 38: 131–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, James (1987).Dollars and Borders: US Government Attempts to Restrain Capital Flows 1960–80. London: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric (1993). ‘When finance was the servant: International capital movements in the Bretton Woods order,’ in Phil Cerny, ed.,Finance and World Politics: Markets, Regimes and States in the Post-Hegemonic Era. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric (1994a).States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric (1994b). ‘Post-globalization: Is the financial liberalization trend likely to be reversed?’ in Daniel Drache and Robert Boyer, eds.,Global Markets: Do Nations States Have a Future? Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Fred and Peter Oppenheimer (1976). ‘The trial of managed money: Currency, credit, and prices 1920–70,’ in Carlo Cipolla, ed.,Fontana Economic History of Europe: The Twentieth Century, Part 2. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsefield, John (1969).International Monetary Fund 1945–65, Vol. 3. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, Geoffrey (1984).Capitalism Divided: The City and Industry in British Social Development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (1974).International Monetary Reform: Documents of the Committee of Twenty. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, Ethan (1989). ‘Resolving the regulator's dilemma: International coordination of banking regulations,’International Organization 43: 323–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, William (1984).Mrs. Thatcher's Economic Experiment. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Janet (1976).Bankers and Borders: The Case of American Banks in Britain. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Maynard (1930).A Treatise on Money, Vol. 2,The Applied Theory of Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, Charles (1989).Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. London: Macmillan, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen (1976). ‘State power and the structure of international trade,’World Politics 28: 317–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Lawrence (1971). ‘Private international finance,’International Organization 25: 523–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levich, Richard (1988). ‘Financial innovations in international financial markets,’ in Martin Felstein, ed.,The US in the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, Robert (1989). ‘Liberating capital movements: A new OECD commitment,’The OECD Observer 159: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loriaux, Michael (1991).France After Hegemony: International Change and Financial Reform. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson, Donald and Liliana Rojas-Suarez (1993).Liberalization of the Capital Account: Experiences and Issues. Washington: International Monetary Fund, Occasional Paper no. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Richard and Dwight Lee (1991).Quicksilver Capital: How the Rapid Movement of Wealth Has Changed the World. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Robert and John Wood (1979).Exchange Control For Ever? London: Institute for Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Michael (1991).The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution: The USA, UK and Japan. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, John (1982).US International Monetary Policy: Markets, Power and Ideas as Sources of Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Hugh and R. Tachi (eds.) (1986).Japan and the US Today. New York: Centre of Japanese Economy and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Louis (1988).Opening Financial Markets: Banking Politics on the Pacific Rim. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plender, John (1986/7). ‘London's big bang in international context,’International Affairs 63: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, Robert (1989).Financial Markets and Governments. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, Working Papers no. 57.

  • Robinson, Joan (1944). ‘The US in the world economy,’Economic Journal 54: 430–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1989).Financial Politics in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John (1982). ‘International regimes, transactions and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order,’International Organization 36: 379–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, Wayne and John Zysman (1989). ‘1992: Recasting the European bargain,’World Politics 42: 95–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan (1990). ‘Finance, information and power,’Review of International Studies 16: 259–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Philip (1991).Capital Flows in the 1980s. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, Geoffrey (1991). ‘Markets beyond politics?: The state and the internationalization of financial markets,’European Journal of Political Research 19: 197–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dormael, Armand (1978).Bretton Woods: Birth of a Monetary System, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vipond, Peter (1991). ‘The liberalisation of capital movements and financial services in the European single market: A case study in regulation,’European Journal of Political Research 19: 227–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Andrew (1991).World Power and World Money: The Role of Hegemony and International Monetary Order. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wriston, Walter (1988). ‘Technology and sovereignty,’Foreign Affairs 67: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helleiner, E. Freeing money: Why have states been more willing to liberalize capital controls than trade barriers?. Policy Sci 27, 299–318 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000062

Keywords

Navigation