Abstract
This article analyzes the different paradigms of human rights policy discourse that characterize non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and governments. Focusing on Canadian-based human rights NGOs and the Canadian government, it uses a five-fold classification scheme to make sense of these competing paradigms of discourse: (1) process: how actors define themselves, and how they define their roles within the international human rights machinery; (2) objectives: perceptions of the purpose of the international human rights system and goals to be pursued therein; (3) scope: the breadth of issue definition and consequent action; (4) evidence: the standards whereby empirical claims are filtered, constructed and judged; and (5) action strategies: the enduring patterns of practical action founded upon the preceding categories. The article shows that despite shared objectives and a common commitment to human rights, NGO and government discourses differ sharply and yield markedly different action strategies. Progress in international human rights will continue to depend on NGO-government collaboration, however, and the article ends with some observations on how these differences in discourse might be addressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston, Philip (1987). ‘Out of the abyss: the challenges confronting the new U.N. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.’Human Rights Quarterly 9: 332–381.
Alston, Philip (1994). ‘The UN's human rights record: from San Francisco to Vienna and beyond.’Human Rights Quarterly 16: 375–390.
Armstrong, J. D. (1986). ‘Non-governmental organizations,’ in R. J. Vincent, ed.Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–260.
Atkinson, Michael M. and William D. Coleman (1992). ‘Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance.’Governance 5: 154–180.
Bennett, Colin and Michael Howlett (1992). ‘The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change.’Policy Sciences 25: 275–294.
Boli, John (1987). ‘Human rights or state expansion?: Cross-national definitions of constitutional rights, 1870–1970,’ in George M. Thomas et al., eds.Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 133–149.
Burgers, Jan Herman (1992). ‘The road to San Francisco: the revival of the human rights idea in the twentieth century.’Human Rights Quarterly 14: 447–477.
Cranston, Maurice (1973).What Are Human Rights? New York: Taplinger.
Department of External Affairs (1993).Report of the Forty-Ninth Session of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. Ottawa: External Affairs and International Trade Canada.
Department of External Affairs/NGO Consultation (1992). Ottawa: External Affairs and International Trade Canada.
Donnelly, Jack (1986). ‘International human rights: a regime analysis.’International Organization 40: 599–642.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1993).Democracy on Trial. Toronto: Anansi.
Ely-Amin, Alicia (1993). ‘Empowering visions: toward a dialectical pedagogy of human rights.’Human Rights Quarterly 15: 640–685.
Etzioni, Amitai (1993).The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.
Falk, Richard (1987). ‘The global promise of social movements: explorations at the edge of time.’Alternatives 12: 173–196.
Fischer, Frank (1980).Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fischer, Frank and John Forester, eds. (1993).The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Glendon, Mary Ann (1991).Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.
Hajer, Maarten A. (1993). ‘Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain,’ in Frank Fischer and John Forester, eds.The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 43–76.
Hambrick, Ralph, Jr. (1974). ‘A guide for the analysis of policy arguments.’Policy Sciences 5: 469–478.
International Affairs Committee of the Canadian Council of Churches (1993).Canadian Churches' Forward Looking Study on Human Rights in Canadian Foreign Policy. 1st draft.
Interview (August, 1992). Senior Canadian UNCHR delegation official, Geneva, August 18, 1992.
Interview (February 1992). Senior Canadian UNCHR delegation official, Geneva, February 19, 1992.
Landry, Marc (1993). ‘Public policy and citizenship,’ in Helen Ingram and Steven Rathgeb Smith, eds.Public Policy for Democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 19–44.
Malin, Andrea Malin (1994). ‘Mothers who won't disappear,’Human Rights Quarterly 15: 187–213.
Melnick, R. Shep (1989). ‘The courts, Congress, and programmatic rights,’ in Richard A. Harris and Sidney M. Milkis, eds.Remaking American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 188–212.
NIHR (1990). Minutes, January 4–5, 1990.
NIHR (1992).Transforming the Model: Building Effective Relations Between NGOs and Government on International Human Rights. Minutes of the Meeting of the Network on International Human Rights, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, September 25–27.
Offe, Claus (1987). ‘Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics: social movements since the 1960s,’ in Charles Maier, ed.Changing Boundaries of the Political. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–105.
Pal, Leslie A. (1993).Interests of State: The Politics of Language, Multiculturalism and Feminism in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Pratt, Cranford (1983–84). ‘Dominant class theory and Canadian foreign policy: the case of the counter-consensus.’International Journal 19: 99–128.
Rochon, Thomas and Daniel A. Mazmanian (1993). ‘Social movements and the policy process.’The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 75–87.
Ryan, Tim (1989). ‘In search of accountability: Canada's human rights policy: an NGO perspective,’ in Irving Brecher, ed.Human Rights, Development and Foreign Policy: Canadian Perspectives. Halifax: The Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 421–434.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.’Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1993). ‘Policy change over a decade,’ in Paul A. Sabatier and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 13–39.
Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). ‘The advocacy coalition framework: assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners,’ in Paul A. Sabatier and Hank C. Jenkins-Smnith, eds.Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 211–235.
Sikkink, Kathryn (1993). ‘Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America.’International Organization 47: 411–441.
Simons, Herbert W., ed. (1990).The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Steiner, Henry J. (1991).Partners: Non-Governmental Organizations in the Human Rights Movement. Cambridge: Harvard Law School Human Rights Program and Human Rights Internet.
Stone, Deborah A. (1988).Paradox and Political Reason. New York: Harper Collins.
Stubbs, Michael (1983).Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistics of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Throgmorton, J. A. (1991). ‘The rhetorics of policy analysis.’Policy Sciences 24: 153–179.
Walker, R. B. J. (1990).One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Weissbrodt, David (1977). ‘The role of international nongovernmental organizations in the implementation of human rights.’Texas International Law Journal 12: 293–320.
Willetts, Peter (1982). ‘Pressure groups as transnational actors,’ in Peter Willetts, ed.Pressure Groups in the Global System: The Transnational Relations of Issue-Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 1–27.
Wiseberg, Laurie S. and Harry M. Scoble (1979). ‘Recent trends in the expanding universe of nongovernmental organizations dedicated to the protection of human rights.’Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 8: 627–658.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pal, L.A. Competing paradigms in policy discourse: The case of international human rights. Policy Sci 28, 185–207 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999675
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999675