Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on segregating and assessing areas of competence

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various complexities that arise in the application of legal and/or clinical criteria to the actual assessment of competence/capacity are discussed, and a particular way of understanding the nature of such criteria is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical Research.Making Health Care Decisions. Washington D.C. (US Govt. Printing Office), 1982.

  2. See, eg., Appelbaum P, Roth L. Clinical Issues in the assessment of competency.Amer J Psy 1981;138:11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubler NN.Ethics on Call. New York: Harmony Books, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brock DW. Letter to the Editor.J Clin Ethics 1991;2:3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Culver CM, Gert B. The inadequacy of incompetence.Milbank Mem Fund Q 1991;68:619–643.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elliot C. Competence as accountability.J Clin Ethics 1991;2:3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Aron MF, Hoffman B. Patient competency to consent: A physician guide.Ontario Med Rev April 1989;56(4).

  8. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.N Engl J Med 1988;319.

  9. See Siberfeld M. Competency assessments.Estates trusts J December 1991;11(2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Checkland, D., Silberfeld, M. Reflections on segregating and assessing areas of competence. Theor Med Bioeth 16, 375–388 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995482

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995482

Key words

Navigation