Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescent decision-making: Giving weight to age-specific values

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adults who give proxy consent for medical treatment for adolescents must decide how much weight to give to adolescents' own preferences. There is evidence that some adolescents choose treatments different from what adults see as most reasonable. It is argued that adolescents choose according to age-specific values, i.e. values they hold, as adolescents, and which fulfil important developmental needs. Because not fulfilling these needs may do serious psychological damage, it is urged that proxies give weight to these values, up to the limit where it would endanger or profoundly limit future life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. See Archard D.Children: Rights and Childhood. London: Routledge, 1993, esp. chapt. 1, for discussion of these issues and arguments. For a good review of the literature, see Brock D. Children's competence for health care decision making. In: Kopelman L, Moskop J, eds.Children and Health Care: Moral and Social Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989: 181–211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For example, see Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry.How Old is Old Enough? The Age of Rights and Responsibilities. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gaylin W. Competence: no longer all or none. In: Gaylin W, Macklin R, eds.Who Speaks for the Child? New York: Plenum, 1982: 27–57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis CE. Decision-making related to health: when could/should children act responsibly? In Melton G, Koocher G, Saks M, eds.Children's Competence to Consent. New York: Plenum, 1983: 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Research Involving Children. Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1977, xxix-xxi, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Capron A. The competence of children as self-deciders in biomedical research. In: Gaylin: 27–57.

  7. Weithorn L, Campbell SB. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions.Child Dev. 1982;53:1589–1598.

    Google Scholar 

  8. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Behavioral Research.Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983: 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Slote M.Goods and Virtues. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schonfeld WA. The body and body image in adolescents. In: Caplan A, Lebovici S, eds.Adolescents: Psychosocial Perspectives. Boston: Basic Books, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis M.Clinical Aspects of Child Development. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger, 1971: chapt. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hofman A, Becker RD, Gabriel HP.The Hospitalized Adolescent. New York: Free Press, 1976: chapt. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slote: 22ff.

  14. Gaylin: 3.

  15. Leiken S. Minors' assent or dissent in medical treatment.J. Pediatr 1983;102:169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mill JS.On Liberty. Rapport E, ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Erikson E.Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Valliant G.Adaptation to Life. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levinson DJ.The Seasons of a Man's Life. New York: Knopf, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheehy G.Passages: Predictable Crisis of Adult Life. New York: Dutton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anonymous. Life flow.Psychology Today, 1987.

  22. Hofman: chapt. 1

  23. Ibid: 12.

  24. Ibid: chapt. 1 and 2.

  25. Ibid: 21

  26. Ibid: 16, 32.

  27. The reasoning here is based on the kind of arguments offered in Feinberg J. The child's right to an open future. In: Aiken W, LaFollette H, eds.Whose Child? Children's Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980: 124–153.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hofman: 174.

  29. See, for example, Brock.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A very brief version of this article has been published as Chapter 3 of Forman EN, Ladd RE.Ethical Dilemmas in Pediatrics: A Case Study Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1991, reprinted by University Press of America, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ladd, R.E., Forman, E.N. Adolescent decision-making: Giving weight to age-specific values. Theor Med Bioeth 16, 333–345 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995480

Key words

Navigation