Skip to main content
Log in

A model of latent symmetry in cross price elasticities

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops the Latent Symmetric Elasticity Structure (LSES), a market share price elasticity model which allows elasticities to be decomposed into two components: a symmetric substitution index revealing the strength of competition between brand pairs, and a brand-specific coefficient revealing the overall impact of a brand on its competitors. An application of the model to unconstrained cross price elasticities shows that brand-price competition in one market is well-represented by a LSES model in which brand substitutability and elasticity asymmetry are related to average price level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allenby, Greg M. (1989). “A Unified Approach to Identifying, Estimating and Testing Demand Structures with Aggregate Scanner Data,”Marketing Science 8 (Summer), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby, Greg M., and Peter E. Rossi. (1991). “Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching Between Brands,”Marketing Science 10 (Summer), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert C., and Ken Wisniewski. (1989). “Price-Induced Patterns of Competition,”Marketing Science 8 (Fall), 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, Randolph E., and V. Srinivasan. (1991). “Determining Inter-Brand Substitutability Through Survey Measurement of Consumer Preference Structures,”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (February), 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Gregory S., Lee G. Cooper, Dominique M. Hanssens, and David F. Midgley. (1988). “Modeling Asymmetric Competition,”Marketing Science 7 (Fall), 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Lee G. (1988). “Competitive Maps: The Structure Underlying Asymmetric Cross Elasticities,”Management Science 34 (June), 707–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Lee G., and Masao Nakanishi. (1988).Market Share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Marketing Effectiveness. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner A., and Gary J. Russell. (1989). “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November), 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner A., and Gary J. Russell. (1991). “Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Brand Quality with Scanner Data: Implications for Brand Equity,” Cambridge, Mass.: Marketing Science Institute, Technical Working Paper 91–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, and S. P. Raj. (1988). “A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities,”Marketing Science 7 (Winter), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Gary J., and Ruth N. Bolton. (1988). “Implications of Market Structure for Elasticity Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (August), 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker, Allan D., David W. Stewart, and Anthony J. Zahorik. (1990). “Determining the Competitive Structure of Product Markets: Practices, Issues and Suggestions,”Journal of Managerial Issues 2 (Summer), 127–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugan, Steven M. (1987). “Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by the Dean's Fund for Faculty Research of the Owen School.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, G.J. A model of latent symmetry in cross price elasticities. Marketing Letters 3, 157–169 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993995

Key words

Navigation