Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

F.J.J. Buytendijk's concept of an anthropological physiology

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his concept of an anthropological physiology, F.J.J. Buytendijk has tried to lay down the theoretical and scientific foundations for an anthropologically-oriented medicine. The aim of anthropological physiology is to demonstrate, empirically, what being specifically human is in the most elementary physiological functions. This article contains a sketch of Buytendijk's life and work, an overview of his philosophical-anthropological presuppositions, an outline of his idea of an anthropological physiology and medicine, and a discussion of some episternological and methodological problems. It is demonstrated that Buytendijk's design of an anthropological physiology is fragmentary and programmatic and that his methodology offers few points of contact for specific anthropological experimental research.

Notwithstanding, it is argued that Buytendijk's description of the subjective, animated body forms a pre-eminent point of reference for all research in physiology and psychology in which the specific human aspect is not ignored beforehand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buytendijk FJJ.Prolegomena to an Anthropological Physiology. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1975 [originally in Dutch, 1965]. See for a complete bibliography of Buytendijk and an introduction to his work, especially focused on his views of physiology and medicine: Dekkers WJM.Het bezielde lichaam. Het ontwerp van een antropologische fysiologie en geneeskunde volgens F.J.J. Buytendijk. Zeist: Kerchebosch BV, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buytendijk FJJ.Proeven over gewoontevorming bij dieren [Experiments about the formation of habits in animals]. Amsterdam: Van Soest, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thinès, G, Zayan R. FJJ Buytendijk's contribution to animal behavior: animal psychology or ethology?Acta Biotheoretica 1975;24:86–99. Some of Buytendijk's publications in this field are: Buytendijk FJJ.Psychologie der dieren. Haarlem: Erven F. Bohn, 1922; Buytendijk FJJ.De wijsheid der mieren. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buytendijk FJJ.Over het verstaan der levensverschijnselen [About Understanding Life Phenomena]. Groningen/Den Haag: Wolters, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buytendijk FJJ.Wesen und Sinn des Spiels. Das Spielen des Menschen und der Tiere als Erscheinungsform der Lebenstriebe. Berlin: Wolff, 1933; Buytendijk, FJJ.The Mind of the Dog. London: Allen & Unwin, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buytendijk FJJ.Over de pijn. Utrecht: Het Spectrum, 1943; Buytendijk FJJ.Pain Its Modes and Functions. London: Hutchinson, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buytendijk FJJ.Algemene theorie der menselijke houding en beweging [General Theory of Human Posture and Movement]. Antwerpen: Standaard-boekhandel, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buytendijk,Algemene theorie: 38; Dekkers: 97; Grene M.Approaches to a Philosophical Biology. New York/London: Basic Books Inc., 1965: 125.

  9. Weizsäcker, V. von.Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1973 [originally 1943]; Kasanmoentalib S.De dans van dood en leven. De Gestaltkreis van Viktor von Weizsäcker in zijn wetenschapshistorische en filosofische context. Zeist: Kerckebosch BV, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mulder Th, Hulstijn W. From movement to action: the learning of motor control following brain damage. In Meijer OG, Roth K, eds.Complex Movement Behavior. ‘The’ Motor-action Controversy. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford/Tokyo: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 1988: 247–259; Tamboer JWI. Images of the body underlying concepts of action. In Meijer OG, Roth K, eds: 439–461; Tamboer JWI. Lichaamsbeweging, handeling, bewegingshandeling. Een poging tot verheldering van het studieobject van de bewegingswetenschappen. In Dekkers WJM, ed.Intentie en cognitie. De problematiek van het subject in de gedragswetenschappen. Nijmegen: Vakgroep Wijsgerige Antropologie KUN, 1988: 77–89; Tamboer JWI.Filosofie van de bewegingswetenschappen. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kockelmans J. ed.Phenomenological Psychology: The Dutch School. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1987; Spiegelberg H.Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry. A Historical Introduction. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example: Buytendijk FJJ.Das Menschliche. Wege zu seinem Verständnis. Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag, 1958; Buytendijk FJJ.Woman. A Contemporary View. New York: Newman Press and Association Press, 1968 [originally Dutch, 1951].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rencontre Encounter Begegnung. Contributions à une psychologie humaine dédiées au professeur F.J.J. Buytendijk. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Het Spectrum, 1957.

  14. Buytendijk FJJ. Zur Phänomenologie der Begegnung. In Buytendijk FJJ.Das Menschliche: 60–100.

  15. Buytendijk.Prolegomena.

  16. Scheler M.Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Bern/München: Francke Verlag, 1978: 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 11.

  18. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 12.

  19. Buytendijk.Algemene theorie: 51.

  20. I prefer Spiegelberg's translation of the German “fungierende Intentionalität” as “functioning intentionality” instead of “acting intentionality,” as is sometimes used in the English translation ofProlegomena. See: Spiegelberg H.The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982: 145, 745.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Husserl E.Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. [Husserliana, Band 6]. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1962: 240.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merleau-Ponty M.Phenomenology of Perception. London/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962: xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buytendijk was baptized (protestant) Dutch Reformed. In the twenties, he was inspired by Catholicism, influenced by the philosophers M. Scheler and J. Maritain, the theologian R. Guardini and the physician V. von Gebsattel among others. In 1937 he was baptized for the second time, now as a Roman Catholic. With respect to the influence of Neothomistic natural philosophy in his work, his contacts with authors such as the biologist E. Wasmann SJ and the philosopher J. de Petter OP (Louvain, Belgium) have to be mentioned. Buytendijk was also much influenced by H. Plessner, especially by Plessner's view of the vegetative, animal and human modes of being. See: Plessner H.Die Stufen des organischen und der Mensch. Einleiting in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merleau-Ponty M.La structure du comportement. Paris: PUF, 1942; Merleau-Ponty.Phenomenology of Perception.

  25. Tiemersma D.Body Schema and Body Image. An Interdisciplinary and Philosophical Study. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV, 1989: 246; Thinès G.Phenomenology and the Science of Behavior. An Historical and Epistemological Approach. London/Boston/Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1977: 133.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Struyker Boudier CEM. Merleau-Ponty and Buytendijk: Report of a relationship. In Rojcewicz R, ed.Clefts in the World by Stephan Strasser and other Essays on Levinas, Merleau-Ponty & Buytendijk. Pittsburgh: The Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, Duquesne University, 1986: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Buytendijk FJJ.Prolegomena: 3.

  28. Verwey G. Medicine, anthropology, and the human body. In Have HAMJ ten, Kimsma GK, Spicker SF, eds.The Growth of Medical Knowledge. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990: 33–162 (134 and 137).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Buytendijk FJJ.Prolegomena: 27.

  30. Ibid: 76.

  31. I prefer the term “bodiliness” (in German “Leiblichkeit”) to the word “embodiment” (In German “Verleiblichung”), since “bodiliness” indicates more clearly what is meant in phenomenology, i.e. an existentialmode of being rather than a proces of becoming a body, of being incarnated.

  32. Strasser S. Das Problem der Leiblichkeit in der phänomenologischen Bewegung. In Tymieniecka AT, ed.Analecta Husserliana [Vol. XVI]. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co, 1983: 19–36 (19).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scheler M. Lived body, environment, and ego. In Spicker SF, ed.The Philosophy of the Body. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970: 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Merleau-Ponty M.Phenomenology of Perception; Zaner RM.The Problem of Embodiment. Some Contributions to a Phenomenology of the Body. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964: 152.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tiemersma: 226–228.

  36. Buytendijk FJJ.Prolegomena: 243. See also: Buytendijk, FJJ. The body in existential psychology.Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry 1, 1961:149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 47.

  38. Buytendijk.Woman: 302.

  39. Heidegger M.Holzwege, Frankfurt a. M, 1950: 31.

  40. Buytendijk. Zur Phänomenologie der Begegnung: 84.

  41. Buytendijk FJJ. De plicht der gezondheid.De Gemeenschap 1940;16:1–21; Buytendijk FJJ.Gezondheid en vrijheid. Utrecht: Katholieke Centrale Vereniging voor Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Buytendijk FJJ. Het medische denken en de Katholieke Universiteit.R. K. Artsenblad 1949;28:17–21; Buytendijk FJJ. De relatie arts-patiënt,Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1959;103:2504–2508.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verwey: 145.

  44. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 23–24.

  45. Laín Entralgo P.Heílkunde in geschichtlicher Entscheidung. Einführung in die psychosomatische Pathologie. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Verwey: 133.

  47. Buytendijk. De relatie arts-patiënt.

  48. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 61–62.

  49. Ibid: 4.

  50. Ibid: 44.

  51. Ibid: 7.

  52. Ibid: 150.

  53. Ibid: 17.

  54. Auersperg A, Derwort A, Schrenk M. Beitrag zur Psychophysiologie der intentionalen Blickbewegung. Erklärungsprinzipien des Verhaltens.Der Nervenarzt 1963;34:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Weizsäcker V von: 27–28.

  56. Auersperg A. Die Coincidentialkorrespondenz als Ausgangspunkt der psychophysiologischen Interpretation des bewusst Erlebten und des Bewusstseins.Der Nervenarzt 1954;25:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 48.

  58. Ibid: 177.

  59. Ibid: 59–60.

  60. Engelhardt HT Jr.Mind-Body: A Categorial Relation. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973: 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 7.

  62. Ibid: 290.

  63. Mooij AWM.De psychische realiteit. Over de psychiatrie als wetenschap. Meppel: Boom, 1989: 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 76.

  65. Strasser S. Tegen de stroom. Beschouwingen naar aanleiding van F.J.J. Buytendijks Prolegomena van een antropologische fysiologie.Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 1966;28:562–573.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 11.

  67. Olst EH van. Het subject in de psychofysiologie. In Dekkers WJM, ed.Intentie en cognitie: 47–62.

  68. Ibid: 52–56. Van Olst's conclusion is based on an exploration of three research areas: (1) habituation and dehabituation of the orientation reaction, (2) the classic conditioned reaction and (3) “problem solving” in relation to the orientation reaction. In every area the notion of a subject is introduced: (1) as a perceiving and valuating subject, (2) as a subject on the level of the organism and (3) as a cognitively operating subject.

  69. Leder tries to deconstruct the mind-body dualism by showing that its roots are hidden in the phenomenology of the lived body. He pays much attention not only to the sensomotoric, but also to the vegetative aspects of the body (digestion, visceral motility etc.). In his study too, however, the question remains how to study the lived body in an empirical-scientific, though not dualistic, way. See: Leder DL.The Absent Body. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dekkers WJM.Het bezielde lichaam; Dekkers WJM. Inleiding. In Dekkers WJM, ed.Intentie en cognitie: 7–12.

  71. Steen WJ van der, Thung PJ.Faces of Medicine, A Philosophical Study. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988: 198.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Spicker SF. Terra firma and infirma species: from medical philosophical anthropology to philosophy of medicine.J Med Philos 1976;1:104–135.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 18–19.

  2. Ibid: 21.

  3. Ibid: 58.

  4. Ibid: 64.

  5. Ibid: 75.

  6. Ibid: 11.

  7. Ibid: 18.

  8. Ibid: 22–23.

  9. Ibid: 23.

  10. In the chapter on human posture Buytendijk again dwells on the central theme ofAlgemene theorie: man's posture is to be understood as a specifically human posture in a specifically human world. This quotation particularly shows the influence of E. Staus. See: Struyker Boudier HMA. Letters between F.J.J. Buytendijk and Erwin W. Straus.Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1988;19:77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 228–230.

  12. Buytendijk.Prolegomena: 279.

  13. Ibid: 281.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Catholic University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Wim J. M. Dekkers

Authors
  1. Wim J. M. Dekkers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekkers, W.J.M. F.J.J. Buytendijk's concept of an anthropological physiology. Theoretical Medicine 16, 15–39 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993786

Key words

Search

Navigation