Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cheating behavior of university students enrolled in an upper-division mass-lecture business course was investigated in a two-semester study. It was found that slightly over 3% of the students plagerized/copied a library research assignment. The findings indicate the need for more empirical studies of what studentsdo—as opposed to what theysay they do—when it comes to academic dishonesty in undergraduate education. Such an approach holds the greatest promise for pinpointing just how widespread cheating really is in the lecture halls and classrooms of academe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, J. (1980). Current trends in college cheating.Psychology in the Schools 17: 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964).Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C. A. (1941). Why students cheat.Journal of Higher Education 12: 418–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, R. A. (1986). By honor bound: Encouraging academic honesty.Educational Record 67: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Diekhoff, G., LaBeff, E., and Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude.Research in Higher Education 25: 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E., and Feldman, S. (1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables.Journal of Educational Psychology 55: 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlins, M., and Hargis, E. (1988). Inaccurate self-perception as a limiting factor in managerial effectiveness.Perceptual and Motor Skills 66:665–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurre, J., and Tauber, R. (1987). An alternative to multiple exam versions for deterring cheating.Journal of Education for Business 62: 297–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. (1978). Deviant involvement, associations, and attitudes: Specifying the underlying causal structures.Sociology and Social Research 63: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludeman, R. (1988). A survey of academic integrity practices in U.S. higher education.Journal of College Student Development 29: 172–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1988). Curbing student dishonesty.The Education Digest 53: 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., and Schaeffer, N. (1986). Cheating among college students estimated with the randomized-response technique.College Student Journal 20: 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffetto, W. (1985). The cheat.Community Technical and Junior College Journal 56: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheers, N., and Dayton, C. M. (1987). Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique.Research in Higher Education 26: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A. (1982). Factors in student dishonesty.Psychological Reports 51: 775–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, C., and Bowers, W. (1970). The college fraternity as an opportunity structure for meeting academic demands.Social Problems 17: 371–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., and Stevens, F. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow's managers revisited: How and why students cheat.Journal of Education for Business 63: 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlins, M., Michaels, C. & Podlogar, S. An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates. Res High Educ 29, 359–364 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992776

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992776

Keywords

Navigation