Skip to main content
Log in

Students' ratings of instructors revisited: Interactions among class and instructor variables

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies concerning students' ratings of instruction have traditionally used the class as the unit of analysis and the ratings have been analyzed in one of two ways: (1) regression analysis, wherein the amount of variability in instructor ratings can be attributed to a set of variables; or (2) analysis of variance, wherein the effect of some selected independent variable on instructor ratings is measured. While both approaches have provided valuable information about the evaluation of instruction, little attention has been given to the interactions among the variables selected. In order to determine how situational variables influence the student at the time an evaluation is performed, the present study used the individual student as the unit of analysis and focused principally on the interactions between three variables related to the class (type, level, and size) and three variables related to the instructor (reputation, rank, and sex). The data were analyzed through 15 two-way factorial analyses of variance, with 23 main effects and 12 interactions reaching significance. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their effect on the student rating process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C., and Mizener, D. A. (1983). Does the attitude similarity of college professors and their students produce ‘bias’ in course evaluations?American Educational Research Journal 20: 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness.Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barke, C. R., Tollefson, N., and Tracy, D. B. (1983). Relationship between course entry attitudes and end of course ratings.Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., and Distenfeld, M. S. (1985). Teacher expressiveness: More important for male teachers than female teachers?Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., and Howe, K. (1987). Evaluations of college professors: Effects of professors' sex-type and sex, and students' sex.Psychological Reports 60: 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., and Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently?Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 308–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, I. I., and Doyle, K. O. (1978). Relationship of curriculum area and course format with student ratings of instruction.American Educational Research Journal 15: 483–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., and Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluations.Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1977). Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to student learning.American Educational Research Journal 14: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., and Menges, R. J. (1971). Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity, and usefulness.Review of Educational Research 41: 511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. A., and Smith, R. A. (1986). A new look at the effect of course characteristics on student ratings of instruction.American Educational Research Journal 23: 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O., and Whitely, S. E. (1974). Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching.American Educational Research Journal 11: 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, P. B., and LaPointe, K. A. (1974). Effects of teacher sex and student sex on the evaluation of college instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, P. B., and LaPointe, K. A. (1975). Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F., and Mazzuca, S. A. (1979). Effects of situations and performance variables on instructional ratings.College Student Journal 13: 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't.Research in Higher Education 9: 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students.Research in Higher Education 18: 3–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look.Research in Higher Education 21: 45–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., and Prohaska, T. (1979). The student as Pygmalion: Effect of student expectation on the teacher.Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., and Glasman, N. S. (1978). Student perceptions of their qualifications to evaluate college teaching.College Student Journal 12: 398–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B. (1975). Sex role stereotypes and teacher evaluations.Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 751–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B. (1976). The effects of sex, sex-stereotyped descriptions, and institution on evaluations of teachers.Sex Roles 2: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. G. (1978). Variables affecting university student ratings of instructor behavior.American Educational Research Journal 15: 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, J. E. and Kremer, L. (1980). Attitudes toward higher education and course evaluation.Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 610–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H., and LeUnes, A. (1974). Students' evaluation of an instructor: Effects of similarity of attitudes.Psychological Reports 34: 1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1979). Poor learning from good teachers.Academe 6: 376–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1977). The validity of students' evaluations: Classroom evaluations of instructors independently nominated as best and worst teachers by graduating seniors.American Educational Research Journal 14: 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1980). The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching.American Educational Research Journal 17: 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Student evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research.International Journal of Educational Research 11: 253–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., and Overall, J. U. (1981). The relative influence of course level, course type, and instructor on students' evaluations of college teaching.American Educational Research Journal 18: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Overall, J. U., and Kesler, S. P. (1979). Class size, students' evaluations, and instructional effectiveness.American Educational Research Journal 16: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, D. D., Ware, W. B., and Smith, A. B. (1978). A comparison of student ratings of teaching assistants and faculty members.American Educational Research Journal 15: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. P., Abrami, P. C., Leventhal, L., and Check, J. (1979). Instructor reputation: An expectancy relationship involving student ratings and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 776–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeo, F. F., and Weber, W. A. (1985). An examination of variables which affect student ratings of university faculty.College Student Journal 19: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. J., Anderson, J. A., and Birchler, A. B. (1980). Student evaluation: The faculty respond.Research in Higher Education 12: 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., and Glass, G. V. (1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction.American Educational Research Journal 17: 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. M., and Skanes, G. R. (1974). Validity of student evaluation of teaching and the characteristics of successful instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, N., and Wigington, H. (1986). Teacher-generated and student-generated variability in teacher effectiveness ratings.Instructional Science 15: 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, N., Tracy, D. B., Barke, C. R., and Kaiser, J. (1983a). The influence of selected student and course characteristics on teacher effectiveness ratings.College Student Journal 17: 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, N., Wigington, H., and McKnight, P. (1983b). Course ratings as measures of instructional effectiveness.Instructional Science 12: 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, B. J., and Umble, M. M. (1980). The relationship of class size, class level, and core vs non-core classification for a class to student ratings of faculty: Implications for validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement 40: 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wigington, H., Tollefson, N. & Rodriguez, E. Students' ratings of instructors revisited: Interactions among class and instructor variables. Res High Educ 30, 331–344 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992608

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992608

Keywords

Navigation