Abstract
This paper explores the organizational strategies used to represent information about political actors in memory, and it illustrates the usefulness of a specific measure, the adjusted ratio of clustering score (ARC), for inferring memory structure. Assuming the operation of an associative network model, we argue that information about a political actor can be organized along three distinct dimensions: attribute type (differentiating between issue positions and personal attributes), partisanship (differentiating between characteristics typical of Republicans and Democrats), and evaluative type (differentiating between positively and negatively evaluated attributes). The results of a laboratory study indicate that organization along the attribute type dimension was most common, with some evidence of partisan organization. There was no evidence of organization along the evaluative dimension. The implications of the study for understanding individual differences in political reasoning, and the consequences of memory organization strategies, are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, John R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning.American Political Science Review 79: 1061–1078.
Brown, Steven R. (1980).Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bower, Gordon H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist 36: 129–148.
Clark, Margaret S., and Fiske, Susan T. (eds.) (1982).Affect and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model.American Journal of Political Science 28: 95–126.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent. New York: John Wiley.
Downs, Anthony (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Fazio, Russell H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In Anthony R. Pratkanis, Steven J. Breckler, and Anthony G. Greenwald (eds.),Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fazio, Russell H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In Clyde Hendrick and Margaret S. Clark (eds.)Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fiske, Susan T. (1986). Schema-based versus piecemeal politics: A patehwork guilt, but not a blanket, of evidence. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fiske, Susan T., and Kinder, Donald R. (1981). Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition. In Nancy Cantor and John Kihlstrom (eds.),Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fiske, Susan T., Lau, Richard R., and Smith, Richard A. (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise.Social Cognition 8: 31–48.
Fiske, Susan T., and Pavelchak, Mark A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Development in schema-triggered affect. In Robert M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins (eds.),Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. (1984).Social Cognition. New York: Random House.
Hamilton, David L., Driscoll, Denise M., and Worth, Leila T. (1989). Cognitive organization of impressions: Effects of incongruency in complex representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 925–939.
Hastie, Reid (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 44–56.
Hastie, Reid (1986). A primer of information-processing theory for the political scientist. In Richard R. Lau and David. O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hastie, Reid and Park, Bernadette (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review 93: 258–268.
Hastie, Reid, Park, Bernadette, and Weber, Renee (1984). Social memory. In Robert S. Wyer and Thomas K. Srull (eds.),Handbook of Social Cognition, vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Isen, Alice M. (1984). Affect, cognition, and social behavior. In Robert S. Wyer and Thomas K. Srull (eds.),Handbook of Social Cognition, vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Judd, Charles M., and Krosnick, Jon A. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In Anthony R. Pratkanis, Steven J. Breckler, and Anthony G. Greenwald (eds.),Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krosnick, Jon A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15: 297–308.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1936).Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lau, Richard R. (1989). Cognitive ability and electoral choice.Political Behavior 11: 5–32.
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing.American Political Science Review 80: 505–521.
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation.American Political Science Review 37: 180–194.
Lusk, Cynthia M., and Judd, Charles M. (1988). Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24: 105–126.
Luskin, Robert C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication.American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–899.
Mayer, John D., and Bower, Gordon H. (1986). Learning and memory for personality prototypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 473–492.
McGraw, Kathleen M., Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication.Political Behavior 12: 41–58.
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil (1990). The effects of general and domain-specific expertise on political memory and judgment.Social Cognition 8: 9–30.
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 80: 521–541.
Murphy, Martin D. (1979). Measurement of category clustering in free recall. In C. Richard Puff (ed.),Memory Organization and Structure. New York: Academic Press.
Murphy, Martin D., and Puff, C. Richard (1982). Free recall: Basic methodology and analyses. In C. Richard Puff (ed.),Handbook of Research Methods in Human Memory and Cognition. New York: Academic Press.
Ostrom, Thomas M., Pryor, John B., and Simpson, David. O. (1981). The organization of social information. In E. Tory Higgins, C. Peter Herman, and Mark P. Zanna (eds.),Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roenker, Daniel L., Thompson, Charles P., and Brown, Sam C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall.Psychological Bulletin 76: 45–48.
Scott, William A., Osgood, D. Wayne, and Peterson, Christopher (1979).Cognitive Structure: Theory and Measurement of Individual Differences Washington, DC: Winston & Sons.
Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Schaffer, Lynitta G. (1986). A shematic variant of symbolic politics theory, as applied to racial and gender equality. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sedikides, Constantine, and Ostrom, Thomas M. (1988). Are person categories used when organizing information about unfamiliar sets of persons?Social Cognition 6: 252–267.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip, E. (1990). Reasoning and Choice: Exploration in Political Psychology. Unpublished book manuscript.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Tetlock, Philip E. (1986). Interrelationship of political ideology and public opinion. In Margaret G. Hermann (ed.),Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Srull, Thomas K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7: 440–462.
Srull, Thomas K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In Robert S. Wyer and Thomas K. Srull (eds.),Handbook of Social Cognition, vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stimson, James A. (1975). Belief systems: Constraint, complexity, and the 1972 election.American Journal of Political Science 19: 393–418.
Tesser, Abraham, and Shaffer, David R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change.Annual Review of Psychology 41: 479–523.
Tetlock, Philip, and Levi, Ariel (1982). Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18: 68–88.
Wyer, Robert S., Budesheim, Thomas L., and Lambert, Alan J. (1990). Cognitive representations of conversations about persons.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 218–238.
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context.Psychological Review 93: 322–359.
Zaller, John (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response.Social Cognition 8: 125–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGraw, K.M., Pinney, N. & Neumann, D. Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Polit Behav 13, 165–189 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992295
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992295