Skip to main content
Log in

The determinants of progress to the doctoral degree

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The time doctoral students expect to take to complete their degree is investigated in a model which stresses the effects of economic factors. The model also accounts for the interdependency among such variables as employment hours, study hours, household income, and part-time study. We find that field of study, amount of borrowing, household income, and study hours have direct effects on expected time to degree. Indirect effects also occur from employment hours and the amount of fellowship, scholarship, or grant aid. When the sample is separated into foreign and U.S. students, we find that U.S. students underestimate their time to degree. Also, household incomes are higher for U.S. students and increase the time to degree, while the opposite is true for foreign students. Teaching assistantships increase the time to degree for foreign students while research assistantships reduce it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedi, J., and Benkin, E. (1987). The effects of students' academic, financial, and demographic variables on time to the doctorate.Research in Higher Education 27(1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1989). Slow pace toward doctorates prompts fear of unfilled jobs.New York Times, May 3.

  • Bowen, W. G., and Sosa, J. A. (1989).Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froomkin, J. (1983). Financing graduate students. In J. Froomkin (ed.),The Crisis in Higher Education. New York: The Academy of Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, L. (1989). The financing of graduate education: A case study of Rutgers University. B.A. Thesis. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girves, J. E., and Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress.Journal of Higher Education 59: 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. (1987). Student loans: Are they overburdening a generation? Washington, DC: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, R. T. (1984). Factors influencing the enrollment decisions of high-ability applicants admitted to selected graduate programs at Rutgers University. New Brunswick: Rutgers University, Office of Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, A. M. (1986).Students in Graduate and Professional Education: What We Know and Need to Know. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaney, G. D. (1984). An analysis of financial aid in the recruitment of graduate students at Ohio State University.Journal of Student Financial Aid, Winter, pp. 11–20.

  • National Research Council (annual).Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Tuckman, H., Coyle, S., and Bae, Y. (1990).On Time to the Doctorate. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillingham, L., Seneca, J.J. & Taussig, M.K. The determinants of progress to the doctoral degree. Res High Educ 32, 449–468 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992186

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992186

Keywords

Navigation