Abstract
The present study, employing a 2×2 design, examines the independent and interactive effects of two experimentally manipulated variables, Anonymity (A) and Retaliatory Potential (RP), on students' ratings of faculty performance. Data were obtained from 188 students at a large midwestern university using an instrument that had been specially developed for the study. A hypothesized main effect was found for A: The professor was rated more positively by students completing signed ratings than those completing ratings anonymously. The data showed no support, however, for the hypothesized RP main effect or the A×RP interactive effect. Practical implications of the study's findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleamoni, L. M., and Spencer, R. E. (1973). The Illinois course evaluation questionnaire: A description of its development and a report of some of its results. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:669–684.
Anikeeff, A. M. (1953). Factors affecting student evaluation of college faculty members. Journal of Applied Psychology 37:458–460.
Ash, P., and Abramson, E. (1952). The effect of anonymity on attitude questionnaire responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47:722–723.
Bausell, R. B., and Magoon, J. (1972). Expected grade in a course, grade point average and student ratings of the instructor. Educational and Psychological Measurement 32:1013–1023.
Becker, G., and Bakal, D. A. (1970). Subject anonymity and motivational distortion in self-report data. Journal of Clinical Psychology 26:207–209.
Benson, L. E. (1941). Studies in secret-ballot technique. Public Opinion Quarterly 5:79–82.
Bledsoe, J. C., Brown, I. D., and Strickland, A. D. (1971). Factors related to pupil observation reports of teachers and attitudes toward their teacher. Journal of Educational Research 65:119–126.
Braunstein, D. N., Klein, G. A., and Pachla, M. (1973). Feedback expectancy and shifts in student ratings of college faculty. Journal of Applied Psychology 58:254–258.
Butler, R. P. (1973). Effects of signed and unsigned questionnaires for both sensitive and nonsensitive items. Journal of Applied Psychology 57:348–349.
Centra, J. A. (1974). The relationship between student and alumni ratings of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement 34:321–325.
Corey, S. M. (1937). Signed versus unsigned attitude questionnaires. Journal of Educational Psychology 28:144–148.
Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., and Menges, R. J. (1971). Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity and usefulness. Review of Educational Research 41:511–535.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–333.
Elinson, J., and Haines, V. T. (1950). Role of anonymity in attitude surveys. American Psychologist 5:315.
Fischer, R. P. (1946). Signed versus unsigned personal questionnaires. Journal of Applied Psychology 30:220–225.
Fuller, C. (1974). Effect of anonymity on return rate and response bias in a mail survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 59:292–296.
Hamel, L., and Reif, H. G. (1952). Should attitude questionnaires be signed? Personnel Psychology 5:87–92.
Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the Social Sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Heilman, J. D., and Armentrout, W. D. (1936). The rating of college teachers on ten traits by their students. Journal of Educational Psychology 27:197–216.
Holmes, D. S. (1971). The relationship between expected grades and students' evaluations of their instructors. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31:951–957.
Holmes, D. S. (1972). Effects of grades and disconfirmed grade expectancies on students' evaluations of their instructor. Journal of Educational Psychology 63:130–133.
Hudelson, E. (1951). The validity of student rating of instructors. School and Society 73:265–266.
Kennedy, W. R. (1975). Grades expected and grades received—their relationship to students' evaluations of faculty performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 67:109–115.
King, F. W. (1970). Anonymous versus identifiable questionnaires in drug usage surveys. American Psychologist 25:982–985.
Kosen, D., Kitchen, C., Kochen, M., and Stodolosky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30:803–810.
Maslow, A. H., and Zimmerman, W. (1956). College teaching ability, scholarly activity and personality. Journal of Educational Psychology 47:185–189.
McKeachie, W. J., Lin, U., and Mann, W. (1971). Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies. American Educational Research Journal 8:435–445.
Parent, J., Forward, J., Canter, R., and Mohling, J. (1975). Interactive effects of teaching strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology 67:764–769.
Rayder, N. F. (1968). College student ratings of instructors. Journal of Experimental Education 37:76–81.
Remmers, H. H. (1928). The relationship between students' marks and students' attitudes toward instructors. School and Society 28:759–760.
Rodin, M., and Rodin, B. (1973). Student evaluations of teachers. Journal of Economic Education 5:5–9.
Rosen, N. A. (1960). Anonymity and attitude measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 24:675–679.
Royce, J. D. (1956). Popularity and the teacher. Education 77:233–237.
Rutkowski, K., and Domino, G. (1975). Interrelationship of study skills and personality variables in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 67:784–789.
Schuh, A. J., and Crivelli, M. A. (1973). Animadversion error in student evaluations of faculty teaching effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 58:259–260.
Schwab, D. P. (1975). Course and student characteristic correlates of the course evaluation instrument. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:742–747.
Snyder, C. R., and Clair, M. (1976). Effects of expected and obtained grades on teacher evaluation and attribution of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 68:75–82.
Stewart, C. T., and Malpass, L. F. (1966). Estimates of achievement and ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Research 59:347–350.
Stone, E. F., Schmitt, N., and Rabinowitz, S. (1977). Determinants of student ratings of faculty performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Kissimmee, Florida, August 15.
Sullivan, A. M., and Skanes, G. R. (1974). Validity of student evaluation of teaching and the characteristics of successful instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 66:584–590.
Voeks, V. W., and French, G. M. (1960). Are student-ratings of teachers affected by grades? Journal of Higher Education 31:330–334.
Weaver, C. H. (1960). Instructor rating by college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 51:21–25.
Weigel, R. G., Oetting, E. R., and Tasto, D. L. (1971). Differences in course grades and student ratings of teacher performance. School and Society 99:60–62.
Weinstein, A. G. (1976). Some relationships between attributed social power of faculty and student course evaluations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences (Midwest Division), Detroit, Michigan, May 6, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stone, E.F., Spool, M.D. & Rabinowitz, S. Effects of anonymity and retaliatory potential on student evaluations of faculty performance. Res High Educ 6, 313–325 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992176
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992176