Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualizations of good citizenship and political participation

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theorists have variously defined what it means to be a good citizen. But how do citizensthemselves views their responsibilities? And is there any relationship between a person's view of citizenship and his or her political participation? This paper uses a combination of methods to explore these issues. A Q method study reveals four citizenship perspectives that provide evidence for striking differences in how people define the participatory responsibilities of a good citizen. An exploratory survey analysis finds that the four citizenship perspectives are significantly related to political behavior, even when socioeconomic status and attitudinal variables related to participation are controlled. While adding to our understanding of participation, these findings also underscore the importance of investigating the conceptualizations of citizens to gain more complete understandings of how political systems work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba (1963).The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baas, Larry (1980). The Constitution as symbol.American Politics Quarterly 8: 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. M. (1988).Citizenship: Rights, Struggle and Class Inequality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin (1984).Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Samuel, Max Kaase, et al. (1979).Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen (1986).Apathy in America, 1960–1984. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen, and Linda Bennett (1986). Political participation. In Samuel Long (ed.)Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Arthur (1967).The Process of Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1908.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard, Paul Lazarsfeld, and William McPhee (1954).Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven (1980).Political Subjectivity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston, Ivor Crewe, and Donald Searing (1991). The nature of citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical comments on theoretical themes.Journal of Politics 53: 800–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Stanley Feldman (1984). Group identification, values, and the nature of political beliefs.American Politics Quarterly 12: 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston, Stephen Leonard, and Donald Searing (1993). Duty is a four-letter word: Democratic citizenship in the liberal polity. In George Marcks and Russell Hanson (eds.)Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Donald Searing (1987). Citizenship regained: A new framework for the study of political socialization. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Dagger, Richard (1981). Metropolis, memory, and citizenship.American Journal of Political Science 25: 715–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert (1956).Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John (1988). The mismeasure of political man.Journal of Politics 50: 705–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John (1990).Discursive Democracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John, Margaret Clark and Garry McKenzie (1989). Subject and system in international interaction.International Organization 43: 475–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas (1986).Who's Running America? 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Amy (1988). Abortion politics as symbolic politics: An investigation into belief systems.Social Science Quarterly 68: 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, Robert, and Robert Lamb (1975).Political Alienation in Contemporary America. New York: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Russell (1985).The Democratic Imagination in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, Barry (1974).The Nature of Democracy. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, Fred (1984).Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert (1962).Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Robert (1965). The tense citizen and the casual patriot: Role confusion in American politics.Journal of Politics 27: 735–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, A. D. (1935).The Essentials of Democracy, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, Edgar (1963). Civic education, community norms, and political indoctrination.American Sociological Review 28: 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C. B. (1977).The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1977).Class, Citizenship and Social Development. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, Herbert (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics.American Political Science Review 58: 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester, and M. L. Goel (1977).Political Participation, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1910).Representative Government. London: Everyman Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1963).Essays on Politics and Culture. Himmelfarb G., ed. New York.

  • Mills, C. Wright (1956).The Power Elite. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Edward (1977).Inequality in Classroom Learning: Schooling and Democratic Citizenship. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morone, James (1990).The Democratic Wish. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. Russell (1986).The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole (1970).Participation and Democratic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole (1975). A contribution to the political theory of organizational democracy.Administration and Society 7: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole (1980). The civic culture: A philosophic critique. In Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba (eds.),The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portis, Edward (1985). Citizenship and personal identity.Polity 18: 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Charles, and John Spicer Nichols, (1983). The next-birthday method of respondent selection.Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1962).Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph (1950).Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, Roberta, and Marilyn Hoskin, eds. (1991).Education and Democratic Citizenship. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eric R. A. N. (1989).The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, John L., Amy Fried, and Mary G. Dietz (1992). Patriotism, politics, and the presidential election of 1988.American Journal of Political Science 36: 200–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Amy Fried, John L. Sullivan, and Mary Dietz (1992). Mixing methods: A multi-stage strategy for studying patriotism and citizen participation.Political Analysis 3: 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis (1970).The Democratic Citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David (1951).The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael (1989). Citizenship. In Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell Hanson (eds.),Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, Robert (1974).Political Learning, Political Choice, and Democratic Citizenship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, Harmon (1964).Interest Groups in American Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theiss-Morse, E. Conceptualizations of good citizenship and political participation. Polit Behav 15, 355–380 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992103

Keywords

Navigation