Skip to main content
Log in

Assessments of group influence, subjective political competence, and interest group membership

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the relationship between citizens' assessments of how much influence the group they identify with is able to exercise in American politics and their subjective political competence and political participation. Appraisals of group influence have a powerful effect on subjective political competence, fulfilling theoretical expectations outlined by Leon Festinger many years ago. Moreover, assessments of group influence affect individuals' decision concerning membership in an interest group that promotes the interest of one's reference group. The work reported here is an improvement over past efforts in that it explicitly defines and assesses the causal importance of a concept that has been featured in prior research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Paul (1983).Political Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, George I. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy.”Political Methodology 1: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Dennis (1991).Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela (1984). The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation.Journal of Politics 3: 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In Angus Campbell and Philip E. Converse (eds.),The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Stephen C. (1979). Efficacy, trust, and political behavior: An attempt to resolve a lingering conceptual dilemma.American Politics Quarterly 7: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Stephen C., Richard G. Niemi, and Glenn E. Silver (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items.Political Behavior 7: 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1985). Rationality, morality, and collective action.Ethics 96: 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon A. (1947). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations 7: 117–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P., and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1989). Is negative voting an artifact?American Journal of Political Science 33: 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, Norman, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Oran R. Young (1971).Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell (1982).Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Jeffrey W. (1987). Electoral context and political preference: A perspective from reference group theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, John M., and Richard L. Moreland (1987). Social comparison and outcome evaluation in group contexts. In J. C. Masters and W. P. Smith (eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Terry M. (1980).The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Edward, and Karl-Dieter Opp (1987). The rationality of collective action.American Politcial Sicence Review 81: 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, Jr. (1965).The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter (1986). Soft incentives and collective action: Participation in the anti-nuclear movement.British Journal of Political Science 16: 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, Norman J., and Shirley Elder (1978).Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, Lawrence (1988). Organization Maintenance and the Retention Decision in Groups.American Political Science Review 82: 1129–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, Carole J. (1989a). “Relational goods” and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action.Public Choice 62: 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, Carole J. (1989b). Rational turnout: The neglected role of groups.American Journal of Political Science 33: 390–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Norman Nie (1972).Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, J.W. Assessments of group influence, subjective political competence, and interest group membership. Polit Behav 15, 309–325 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992100

Keywords

Navigation