Skip to main content
Log in

Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using 3,355 class section means, the relationship between six predictor variables and student ratings of instruction (CEQ) was investigated by computing the intercorrelation matrix among all variables and by performing several regression analyses. Results of the study indicated that all linear interactions were negligible and that more than one-fourth of the criterion variance was shared with all the predictor variables. Two predictor variables, expected grade and required-elective, provided extremely large contributions to the prediction of the criterion measure, however. Implications of the validity results with respect to normative data and thus to the administrative use of the ratings were illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  • Batista, E. E., and Brandenburg, D. C. (1976). The instructor self-evaluation form: Development and validation of an ipsative forced-choice measure of self-perceived faculty performance. Unpublished.

  • Brandenburg, D. C., and Aleamoni, L. M. (1976). Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) Results Interpretation Manual Form 73. (Manual. Urbana, Illinois). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Measurement and Research Division of the Office of Instructional Resources.

  • Hildebrand, M., Wilson, R. C., and Dienst, E. R. (1971). Evaluating University Teaching. Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Aleamoni, L. M. (1976). On the invalidity of student ratings for administrative personnel decision (comment). Journal of Higher Education 47:607–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Graham, M. H. (1974). The relationship between CEQ ratings and instructor's rank, class size and course level. Journal of Educational Measurement 11:189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Spencer, R. E. (1973). The Illinois course evaluation questionnaire: A description of its development and a report of some of its results. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:669–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Journal of Educational Measurement 64:274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausell, R. B., and Magoon, J. (1972). Expected grade in a course, grade point average, and student ratings of the course and the instructor. Educational and Psychological Measurement 32:1013–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, N. M. (1952). Student evaluation of faculty. Journal of Higher Education 23:495–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O., and Whitely, S. E. (1974). Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching. American Educational Research Journal 11:259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1961). The appraisal of college teaching: An analysis of ends and means. Journal of Higher Education 32:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garverick, C. M., and Carter, H. D. (1962). Instructor ratings and expected grades. California Journal of Educational Research 13:218–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. W. (1971). Faculty allocation of effort and student course evaluations. Journal of Educational Research 64:405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granzin, K. I., and Painter, J. J. (1973). A new explanation for students' course evaluation tendencies. American Educational Research Journal 10:115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. S. (1971). The relationship between expected grades and students' evaluation of their instructors. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31:951–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiobu, R. M., and Pollis, C. A. (1971). Student evaluations of courses and instructors. The American Sociologist 6:317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, W. R. (1975). Grades expected and grades received—their relationship to students' evaluation of faculty performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 6:109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F., and Pedhauser, E. J. (1973). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooker, E. W. (1968). The relationship of known college grades to course ratings on student selected items. The Journal of Psychology 69:209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, G. D., and Haner, C. F. (1955). Forced-choice applied to college faculty rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement 15:291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magoon, J., and Bausell, R. B. (1973). Required versus elective course ratings. College Student Journal 7:29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J., and Lin, Y. (1971). Sex differences in student response to college teachers: Teacher warmth and teacher sex. American Educational Research Journal 8:221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlman, J. T. (1975). A multivariate analysis of selected class characteristics and student ratings of instruction. Multivariate Behavioral Research 10:81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayder, N. F. (1968). College student ratings of instructors. Journal of Experimental Education 37:76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D. S. (1975). On the invalidity of student ratings for administrative personnel decisions. Journal of Higher Education 46:687–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. H. (1960). Instructor rating by college students. Journal of Educational Psychology 51:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandenburg, D.C., Slinde, J.A. & Batista, E.E. Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations. Res High Educ 7, 67–78 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991945

Key Words

Navigation